Controversial General Political Discussion

[Indigo]

It got overturned on constitutional semantics, since in Roe it was judged as a right to privacy. The issue becomes a problem in the "nor shall any State deprive any person of life" line of the 14th Amendment. There they concluded Roe v Wade was a wrong unconstitutional ruling, from the "life" angle (I'm simplifying but ya I like to read law).

I think the best option here is to add an Amendment which clearly defines abortion rights etc. That is how it is in my country, it's the ridiculous precedent stuff they have which makes things like these complicated for no reason.

Law IS semantics. Call it a reasonable ruling that undid a good decision (right for abortion) made in a wrong approach (Roe v Wade), since now it depends on the states and their level of conservatism.

so you're not even from the US?

 

[Natalija]

so you're not even from the US?

of course not, you can tell by my bad English

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

so you're not even from the US?

What's with you asking everyone if they're from the US? It's like you're new to the forum

 

[K!NG HARA$H!MA]

Pray for Idolo

 

[Saturn-sama]

https://x.com/Bowtiedplayer/status/1812315653006614615

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

Yeah, that's part of the problem, trying to interpret an Amendment which was written like 160 years ago and realistically isn't adapted for 2024.

This is part of the reason they will never have gun control

That's why I prefer oral transmission of history and everything else where laws evolve organically according to gradual changes in culture and values. It also eliminates the danger that comes from literal interpretations of 2000 year old religious texts (which gave us salafism etc) and rewriting & additional text that was not part of the original scripture for political agenda.

 

[Saturn-sama]

Pray for Idolo

how do you insert a photo into your comment? It always gives me an error sadly.

 

[NikaInParis]

of course not, you can tell by my bad English

Girl, you know your English is better than 90% of US citizens
You got that Balkan hax

 

[Indigo]

What's with you asking everyone if they're from the US? It's like you're new to the forum

they seemed really pationate to defend another country's supreme court

kinda weird lok

 

[Zemmi]

Hardest Cover of 2024 🔥🔥🔥

I love there is a badass woman in this picture.

 

[Natalija]

they seemed really pationate to defend another country's supreme court

kinda weird lok

Lol you asked, I gave you the argument for both rulings. It's better to read about things in detail than to spread false info like "Trump got new super powers" etc.

 

[Natalija]

I love there is a badass woman in this picture.

She was the one to carry him later, was kinda surprised

 

[Indigo]

Lol you asked, I gave you the argument for both rulings. It's better to read about things in detail than to spread false info like "Trump got new super powers" etc.

uses quotes

i never said super powers

 

[Natalija]

uses quotes

i never said super powers

I'm glad you picked up on my joke

You said new powers though, which is still factually untrue.

 

[Indigo]

I'm glad you picked up on my joke

You said new powers though, which is still factually untrue.

it is true, as long as the supreme court is in it's majority conservative

 

[Natalija]

it is true, as long as the supreme court is in it's majority conservative

It's not true, the Supreme Court just reread what the constitution says and left it to the lower courts to rule. It doesn't give any "new powers" to any former president.

 

[Indigo]

thinking the supreme court has no party allegiance or bias is crazy

 

[Natalija]

thinking the supreme court has no party allegiance or bias is crazy

I mean I proved my point with their verbatim ruling, you haven't proved yours

 

[Indigo]

It's not true, the Supreme Court just reread what the constitution says and left it to the lower courts to rule. It doesn't give any "new powers" to any former president.

not what 3 of those 9 said in their decisions

but i guess we will ignore that
[automerge]1720969828[/automerge]
It's always gonna be the 6 v 3 thing

Conservatives majority on the Supreme Court

they will literally do whatever they want

 

[K!NG HARA$H!MA]

how do you insert a photo into your comment? It always gives me an error sadly.

That means your hosting the link at some shady site.


Host the link at discord, like me