Controversial General Political Discussion

[Bisoromi Bear]

Yeah, that's part of the problem, trying to interpret an Amendment which was written like 160 years ago and realistically isn't adapted for 2024.

This is part of the reason they will never have gun control

That's why I prefer oral transmission of history and everything else where laws evolve organically according to gradual changes in culture and values. It also eliminates the danger that comes from literal interpretations of 2000 year old religious texts (which gave us salafism etc) and rewriting & additional text that was not part of the original scripture for political agenda.

 

[Saturn-sama]

Pray for Idolo

how do you insert a photo into your comment? It always gives me an error sadly.

 

[NikaInParis]

of course not, you can tell by my bad English

Girl, you know your English is better than 90% of US citizens
You got that Balkan hax

 

[Indigo]

What's with you asking everyone if they're from the US? It's like you're new to the forum

they seemed really pationate to defend another country's supreme court

kinda weird lok

 

[Zemmi]

Hardest Cover of 2024 🔥🔥🔥

I love there is a badass woman in this picture.

 

[Natalija]

they seemed really pationate to defend another country's supreme court

kinda weird lok

Lol you asked, I gave you the argument for both rulings. It's better to read about things in detail than to spread false info like "Trump got new super powers" etc.

 

[Natalija]

I love there is a badass woman in this picture.

She was the one to carry him later, was kinda surprised

 

[Indigo]

Lol you asked, I gave you the argument for both rulings. It's better to read about things in detail than to spread false info like "Trump got new super powers" etc.

uses quotes

i never said super powers

 

[Natalija]

uses quotes

i never said super powers

I'm glad you picked up on my joke

You said new powers though, which is still factually untrue.

 

[Indigo]

I'm glad you picked up on my joke

You said new powers though, which is still factually untrue.

it is true, as long as the supreme court is in it's majority conservative

 

[Natalija]

it is true, as long as the supreme court is in it's majority conservative

It's not true, the Supreme Court just reread what the constitution says and left it to the lower courts to rule. It doesn't give any "new powers" to any former president.

 

[Indigo]

thinking the supreme court has no party allegiance or bias is crazy

 

[Natalija]

thinking the supreme court has no party allegiance or bias is crazy

I mean I proved my point with their verbatim ruling, you haven't proved yours

 

[Indigo]

It's not true, the Supreme Court just reread what the constitution says and left it to the lower courts to rule. It doesn't give any "new powers" to any former president.

not what 3 of those 9 said in their decisions

but i guess we will ignore that

Post automatically merged: Jul 14, 2024

It's always gonna be the 6 v 3 thing

Conservatives majority on the Supreme Court

they will literally do whatever they want

 

[K!NG HARA$H!MA]

how do you insert a photo into your comment? It always gives me an error sadly.

That means your hosting the link at some shady site.


Host the link at discord, like me

 

[Saturn-sama]

That means your hosting the link at some shady site.


Host the link at discord, like me

how is imgur shady? Lol

 

[K!NG HARA$H!MA]

how is imgur shady? Lol

Sometimes the links from there ain't suitable for this site

 

[Zemmi]

I think the major democrat politicians are handling this very well. It's the only way tbh if they want to survive this incident. Going forward they will have to shift their narrative on the presidential election because not only would it be wrong, but hurtful to their campaigns returning to the narrative that Trump is equal to hitler or a threat to democracy.

I think Trump's best bet would be to move to a narrative of unity. It's also the right thing to do because we don't want any nut jobs attempting retaliation against innocent people.

 

[Natalija]

not what 3 of those 9 said in their decisions

but i guess we will ignore that

Fam literally their ruling did nothing but repeat the constitution and tell the Government to prove his guilt on accounts where presidents are not immune. If you wanna prove some kind of misuse of power, you're barking on the wrong ruling

Republican majority in the Supreme Court is no news, they always had it.

 

[Logiko]

Well, that would be funny to call him that lol
You know.. since the guy is literally a dictator who uses religion as a way to use people and create an interstellar war..

I think you just made Horikoshi puke

That's gotta be the thing I disagree with you the most.

Oh well..
Let's agree to disagree on this subject.

and all the leftist media channels continuesly demonizing Trump and spreading actual lies and misinformation.

What channel ? HBO ?

Leftist are not used to spread lies and misinformation mate. At least not the channels.

If you know how it works, you know something true about it

You're trying to say knowledge can be had without truth


Holy shit who deprived this kid of milk or formula growing up

Again, science is not about truth, its about understanding.

Why are they relevant? Lol

Everythings just matter, atoms interacting with atoms right?

Because without morality, we can't exist as a specie. So morality is relevant.

But I don't need to be an idealist to know what is right from what is wrong. In reality, I can be much more precise about it if I'm a materialist.