Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei must go gaolang > your fav is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Logiko/Carrot4Nakama is legend. Even you disagree with 100% of his posts (I'm at around 99% lol) but you just gotta respect this level of posting stamina and dedication to arguing with strangers online about shit that will never come to fruition in any of our lifetimes 
I give almost everyone A for effort. I get bored/lazy too quick to spend much time on a single subject.
Post automatically merged:
You can't use a Smart/Sane person though...
I give him A for effort all the time. I give almost everyone A for effort. I get bored/lazy too quick to spend much time on a single subject.
I give almost everyone A for effort. I get bored/lazy too quick to spend much time on a single subject.
We even had r/art evaluate one of his art breakdowns once
Yup, which validates perfectly my point
Chopper is a man while being in a female body. Meaning that his "himself" is man, not woman.
Funny, right ?
Its not a "'workable" issue mate. That's what you don't understand. Your gender is NOT your body. Its a construction that comes from your social construction and specific brain pattern (science is not complete on the subject)
Its not as easy as "you have a female body therefore you are a woman"
Asking a Trans woman to be a man would be the same as asking Smoker in Tashigi's body to be a woman. Do you understand how dumb it would be ?
Chopper is a man while being in a female body. Meaning that his "himself" is man, not woman.
Funny, right ?
Its not a "'workable" issue mate. That's what you don't understand. Your gender is NOT your body. Its a construction that comes from your social construction and specific brain pattern (science is not complete on the subject)
Its not as easy as "you have a female body therefore you are a woman"
Asking a Trans woman to be a man would be the same as asking Smoker in Tashigi's body to be a woman. Do you understand how dumb it would be ?
And I was still right
https://worstgen.alwaysdata.net/for...-and-the-grand-fleet.79/page-932#post-2604639
I need an occupation since I can't do anything else
Oh yeah, these dark times ! Well, since this makes me seem like an ignorant, I can't let that unchecked, so lets deconstruct this a bit. I need to occupy my thoughts a little:
First : Asking r/cinematography to deconstruct the composition of a panel is like asking as r/carpentry to make a comment about the architecture of Notre Dame de Paris. Sure, they might have a few idea of what they are talking about, but in reality, most cinematograph only know the BASICS of composition since its not their expertise..
Second: The way Sigran actually asked.
Asking stuff like that is the best way to get biased answers like "the guy is dumb" or "the guys don't know shit". Since its an appeal to reactance.
Third: Sigran didn't understand my deconstruction or my argument:
My point was not to say that Carrot was specifically highlighted in the panel, but that Carrot was "A" point of focus, NOT the only one, since she is placed at the center/ON of the all the focusing construction lines and shapes of the panel (the body of Jinbe, the center of the triangulary ISH shaped created by the body of Luffy and Nami, the sight of Usopp and Robin and the face of Jinbe and the symmetry line cutting the panel in two with similar shapes on both sides).
My point was :
- Oda put care into the construction and composition of this panel, so we must not look at it without care
- Oda did NOT choose to focus on Carrot, but he placed her on a focus point. Which made Carrot a focus point by extention as well as Jinbe. Not the major one, but an hidden one. In short, our eyes are directed first toward Jinbe and the head of Luffy (the reunion), and when we extend our sight we can see that Carrot is centered as well (the, what is she doing here?).
Sigran didn't liked my - granted - arrogant comment about having a high degree of knowledge on the subject of composition and storytelling, so he tried to make me look like a fool (which is... well, it speaks for itself).
Thing is.. I was not lying. I'm repeating myself, but I literally studied both those domains from my 16 to my 34 (I consider that i've mastered those things by now, even if I'm still trying to learn new stuff) and this is why I'm always making comments on both all over this forum.
My argument still stands, same as my deconstruction here (even if it is, I admit, really pushed to the limits). To this day, this panel is still an odd panel and should not have existed in that configuration.
In fact, it reminds my of those two panels, which - same thing - should not be existing in this configuration:
I need an occupation since I can't do anything else
Oh yeah, these dark times ! Well, since this makes me seem like an ignorant, I can't let that unchecked, so lets deconstruct this a bit. I need to occupy my thoughts a little:
First : Asking r/cinematography to deconstruct the composition of a pannel is like asking as r/carpentry to make a comment about the architecture of Notre Dame de Paris. Sure, they might have a few idea of what they are talking about, but in reality, most cinematograph only know the BASICS of composition since its not their expertise..
Second: The way Sigran actually asked.
Asking stuff like that is the best way to get biased answers like "the guy is dumb" or "the guys don't know shit". Since its an appeal to reactance.
Third: Sigran didn't understand my deconstruction or my argument:
My point was not to say that Carrot was specifically highlighted in the panel, but that Carrot was "A" point of focus, NOT the only one, since she is placed at the center/ON of the all the focusing construction lines and shapes of the panel (the body of Jinbe, the center of the triangulary ISH shaped created by the body of Luffy and Nami, the sight of Usopp and Robin and the face of Jinbe and the symmetry line cutting the panel in two with similar shapes on both sides).
My point was :
- Oda put care into the construction and composition of this panel, so we must not look at it without care
- Oda did NOT choose to focus on Carrot, but he placed her on a focus point. Which made Carrot a focus point by extention as well as Jinbe. Not the major one, but an hidden one. In short, our eyes are directed first toward Jinbe and the head of Luffy (the reunion), and when we extend our sight we can see that Carrot is centered as well (the, what is she doing here?).
Sigran didn't liked my - granted - arrogant comment about having a high degree of knowledge on the subject of composition and storytelling, so he tried to make me look like a fool (which is... well, it speaks for itself).
Thing is.. I was not lying. I'm repeating myself, but I literally studied both those domains from my 16 to my 34 (I consider that i've mastered those things by now, even if I'm still trying to learn new stuff) and this is why I'm always making comments on both all over this forum.
My argument still stands, same as my deconstruction here (even if it is, I admit, really pushed to the limits). To this day, this panel is still an odd panel and should not have existed in that configuration.
In fact, it reminds my of those two panels, which - same thing - should not be existing in this configuration:
