If you’ll settle for a Brazilian partner, I can get you set up asap
Where is Warchief when you need him??
Post automatically merged:

I know. I took the blow on purpose.



No. It's when there is an intent to make a lot of people die. And we know there is a political intent.



Of course it will. It will at least prevent a lot of violences (Leftist Library):

- [ARTICLE AND STUDIES] - Yes ! Gun controls do in fact have a positive effect on gun violences !
- [DEBUNK] - Myths about Gun violences debunked
- [SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS] - Scientists agree: Guns don't make society safer
- [VIDEO] - Police should not respond to mental health calls
- [VIDEO] - We need to reform the police (and not only in the US) - Last Week with John Oliver



Sorry, the Police is one of my political ennemy. Don't expect me to say good thing about it.



You are the ones who keep bringing up my situation and personal life in the mix to attack me. If you can take the heat, don't bring the heat.

I'm defending myself here. If you want, I can start to do the same with you, but really, you won't like that. I don't think you understand that I'm being VERY KIND not to retaliate on your rethoric guys. I could say a LOT of things that could be very mean. So don't push me and stop attacking people on their personnal lives or experience.



What I get is a RIGHT people fought to get. It's toward THEM that I'm grateful, I should be grateful to NO ONE ELSE.



Then don't bring it.



Another lie ?



No I should not.



I'm mocking no one mate here. You do.


That's because you don't read what I actually say. I've concede more in this thread alone to people that the majority of you guys in this entire forum.

Pay more attention to what I say, you might get surprised.


Again. You pay 0 attention to what I say. In fact, you don't even remember that I was empathic to your own situation once.

Really, pay attention.


What you said was not harsh, it's was false.

You are confusing political opinion with your own personal situations. You are confusing my strenght of defense against bigotry as a dehumanization process.

I understand you, but you do not understand me. You will never be able to understand me with this belief system.

I know how mean, hurtfull and destroying I can become when I really want to hurt someone's feeling. Trust me, you do NOT want me to attack on the personal. So please, refrain yourself from doing that.



No. That's not how human society work.

The MATERIAL conditions have pushed us to create those structure. Our beliefs, our systems, it's the result of material condition > Hence why we talk about "materialism".

When you are poor, your are not more likely to go toward crime because it's our nature, you will go there because the material conditions will push you to go toward crime.

The material condition are the reason why some are rich and some are pure. They are the reasons why people are oppressed are others are not.

To get a better society, we need to improve the material conditions and thus improve the structure that shape society.

This is why I ended up creating a thread asking you guys to act on the STRUCTURE of the forum and stopped reporting people. Because by changing the material structure of society, we change the behaviors.

This is a scientific fact.



There are also far less reason to do crimes. Bad analogy.
The police is your enemy?:ihaha:
 
[
If you’ll settle for a Brazilian partner, I can get you set up asap
a Japanese Brazilian one?
Of course it will. It will at least prevent a lot of violence
To get a better society, we need to improve the material conditions and thus improve the structure that shape society.
of course this is true. but you're moving goalposts here
There are also far less reason to do crimes. Bad analogy
And this is exactly my point! :kaidowhat: In a broken society, people will always find ways to inflict harm, when guns are unavailable they use knives, screwdrivers, cars, improvised explosives or anything they can get their hands on. Banning guns doesn't improve society. Aren't you seeing your own fallacy here?
 
*Adversary.
Enemy is a strong word.
An enemy is someone that is hostile to you and your idea, it's the right word.


And this is exactly my point! :kaidowhat: In a broken society, people will always find ways to inflict harm, when guns are unavailable they use knives, screwdrivers, cars, improvised explosives or anything they can get their hands on. Banning guns doesn't improve society. Aren't you seeing your own fallacy here?
You are twisting what I said here.

I said that it will prevent gun violences. The argument that banning gun will not work because violence will be here anyway is the same as saying that if a class has access to gun or baseball bats it's the same thing.

Reducing gun, reduces gun violence by defaut and therefore it reduces crimes also. It's documented.


- [ARTICLE AND STUDIES] - Yes ! Gun controls do in fact have a positive effect on gun violences !
- [DEBUNK] - Myths about Gun violences debunked
- [SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS] - Scientists agree: Guns don't make society safer
- [VIDEO] - Police should not respond to mental health calls
- [VIDEO] - We need to reform the police (and not only in the US) - Last Week with John Oliver
 
I know how mean, hurtfull and destroying I can become when I really want to hurt someone's feeling. Trust me, you do NOT want me to attack on the personal. So please, refrain yourself from doing that.
Lmao, get off it. You're basically admitting all your sanctimonious behaviour is a facade. Go on, hit me with it.

Honestly, I think I can speak for everyone when I say I'm tired of you, so I'll try never responding again. I'll probably fail - I aint perfect after all.
 
Last edited:
I know. I took the blow on purpose.



No. It's when there is an intent to make a lot of people die. And we know there is a political intent.
yeah the intent to kill all Palestinians in Gaza, that’s the argument. There’s not much proof available that their military directive is that.
 
Lmao, get off it. You're basically admitting all your sanctimonious behaviour is a facade. Go on, hit me with it.
No. I'm telling you that on this forum (and Internet overall) I'm respectfull of the personnal privacy of people, I don't cross the limit. If you are not capable of doing that, just know that everyone is not like you.


Honestly, I think I can speak for everyone when I say I'm tired of you, so I'll try never responding again. I'll probably fail - I aint perfect after all.
Good day to you too.


yeah the intent to kill all Palestinians in Gaza, that’s the argument. There’s not much proof available that their military directive is that.
Actually there are. You just have to look for the declaration of the officials, the way they speak about Gaza, the way sionist talk about Palestinians etc.

There is a CLEAR intent, most observer can see that.. Time and the law will prove it and those guys will end up in jail for a long time.
 
Top