Controversial RELIGIONS & SPIRITUALITIES : Conversations

Suffering is a simple result of evolution. It's the result of physical electrical signals triggered by real phenomenon that goes to our brain and create an urge to avoid said trigger. This creates an illusion in our consciousness that we call suffering. This illusion in return can create real diverse physical reactions. After that, suffering can be simply used by animals to hurt other animals.
So suffering is an illusion? Wow
 
“Because it is” I just demonstrated how it is not via the fact that current theories can later be falsified with new observations. Secondly science fails to empirically prove or explain intuitive/moral truths, so if you believe only with evidence you have a problem justifying your belief in the most basic intuitive truths.
Science not giving you philosiphical answers, spirituality or morality, all doesnt diminish its veracity on the natural world and natural processes.


It being a self improving system is one of the pros not a con” yeah maybe when it comes to understanding how the observable world works but not when it comes to realities that can’t be experimented on. Again science is inherently capped because it relies on dealing with empirical data and the observable world.
Exactly, so it changing with new information and better understanding is good and is what makes it a good method

You are right about realities that cant be experimented on. Doesnt mean people should be expected to believe in extraordinary god claims.
Post automatically merged:

you’re going to be consistent you should also do away with believing in love, justice, evil, honesty and so on since they cannot be proven with empirical evidence. I’m basically trying to show you how utterly baseless it is to deny God’s existence with such a contradictory worldview.
Now moving on the question you asked, the belief in God is actually an innate intuition, one found in virtually every corner of the world, even young Japanese kids as young as 4 or 5 believe in God according to studies such as the “Children see the world as it is designed” study which showcased that kids in Japan believe in God as the originator/creator of the universe.
Were they indoctrinated already? We know Japan is like borderline atheist with some lingering Shintoism, with Shintoism not having any sort of creator in their theology
The same applies to moral views based in religion, due to different covenants and abrogation.

The impossibility of having any evidence either way doesnt mean accepting gods existence isnt baseless as well.


And even if there is such an intuition in humans, views about god vary alot in different cultures. This and the philosophical arguments then at best show the existence of some supernatural entity that started the universe that we cant really know anything about. Compared to that, specific god claims of the various religions are a stretch.

Also mind you that i still dont deny the existence of any supernatural entity or supernaturality. Im still not a materialist, nor do i subsribe to hard/strong atheism.
Post automatically merged:

That's more about faith
Fml then
 
Last edited:
It is the freedom man reclaimed for himself. God is not a superhero and doesn't act like one, but reward and punishment will be given at the end. These Palestinians will be rewarded, if they lived according to his Word. 90% of the Israeli population approves the genocide, so you know how it will go down for them. Natural disasters are part of this life sadly, where they day of death and judgement can appear anytime. You are looking at this from an earthly and atheistic perspective, which doesn't make sense.
Genocide is not a 'natural disaster':lawsigh:

I knew I shoudn't lurk on this thread
You created the thread

He isn't really beating you up, but giving you a shot at eternal life. You don't even have to be his child unless you want it, so it's your choice again. I understand that freedom of choice is hard to understand for left-wings extremists, but the Church is not Maoist China.
Goodness gracious what is this post. Threatening people is not giving them freedom of choice. This is conqueror logic :lawsigh:
Post automatically merged:

The illusion of consciousness of said suffering, an illusion that has real effect on the mind and body.
If consciousness is an illusion so are mind and body.
 
Last edited:
You created the thread
Yeah.. for people to discuss the subject. But I know that I can keep myself from intervening on this subject lol

i'll try to tone down myself.

If consciousness is an illusion so are mind and body
Our body are real (well, unless we are in a simulation, in which case we can make the case that the simulation is real and therefore our "sence of self" is real as well)

For the mind, it depends on how you define it. If you are talking about our imagination for example, it's indeed an illusion, a form of projection of what is really happening inside our brain.
 
Genocide is not a 'natural disaster':lawsigh:
He was talking about earthquakes.
Goodness gracious what is this post. Threatening people is not giving them freedom of choice. This is conqueror logic :lawsigh:
-"Don't bang your head against the wall, it will hurt."
-"This is fascism, I should be free to bang my head against the wall without getting hurt."
Yeah.. for people to discuss the subject. But I know that I can keep myself from intervening on this subject lol

i'll try to tone down myself.


Our body are real (well, unless we are in a simulation, in which case we can make the case that the simulation is real and therefore our "sence of self" is real as well)

For the mind, it depends on how you define it. If you are talking about our imagination for example, it's indeed an illusion, a form of projection of what is really happening inside our brain.
Imagination is made of very real electrical signals. The brain's interpretation of painful stimuli is also electrical signals. In both cases they are very real, it happening inside your brain doesn't mean that it isn't real.
 
Imagination is made of very real electrical signals.
Yup. It's made by electrical signals. But the feeling of having an imagination is an illusion the same way consciouness is.

The brain's interpretation of painful stimuli is also electrical signals.
Yes. That's what I'm explaining.


In both cases they are very real,
The physical interaction are real.
The interpretation of those signal for us as entity is not.

I made this metaphore a few week back:

Your mind is a movie theatre:


> The electricity is your energy and electric signals
> The projector is your brain
> The brand of the projector is the structure of your brain
> The movie is the combinaison of all the previous things before transforming into a consciousness. It's a combinasion in constant evolution
> The projection of the movie on the blank screen is your actual consciousness : your mind, thoughts, consciense, imagination
> The spectator sitted on the red seats is your will and sence of self, the illusion of consciousness.

What is not real is our agency. What is real on the other hand our experience and illusion of said agency.
 
Yup. It's made by electrical signals. But the feeling of having an imagination is an illusion the same way consciouness is.


Yes. That's what I'm explaining.



The physical interaction are real.
The interpretation of those signal for us as entity is not.

I made this metaphore a few week back:

Your mind is a movie theatre:

> The electricity is your energy and electric signals
> The projector is your brain
> The brand of the projector is the structure of your brain
> The movie is the combinaison of all the previous things before transforming into a consciousness. It's a combinasion in constant evolution
> The projection of the movie on the blank screen is your actual consciousness : your mind, thoughts, consciense, imagination
> The spectator sitted on the red seats is your will and sence of self, the illusion of consciousness.

What is not real is our agency. What is real on the other hand our experience and illusion of said agency.
I'm not sure what you mean by agency.
 
How goodness is possible if god is evil? ,,,
The god from the bible is incredibly morally inconsistent.

Goodness by our own standards is based on "don't do onto others what you wouldn't like to be done to you" which I think connects directly to camaraderie and empathy.

We find ourselves in a pickle when we debate the morality of a potential God. Since if he is all good he can't be all powerful and vice-versa. Same thing if he was evil, since we have both good and evil in this world.
 
The god from the bible is incredibly morally inconsistent.

Goodness by our own standards is based on "don't do onto others what you wouldn't like to be done to you" which I think connects directly to camaraderie and empathy.

We find ourselves in a pickle when we debate the morality of a potential God. Since if he is all good he can't be all powerful and vice-versa. Same thing if he was evil, since we have both good and evil in this world.
I'm not being serious with this question, I just thought funny some people debating this question
 
Do you guys think Enel will be back ?

How goodness is possible if god is evil? ,,,
To be honest the Christian God is a jester. Remember the time he told the old men to cut the throat of his baby ? And then stopped him and said it was a joke ? He shouldn't be taken seriously. After all, bible in reverse means "A great ass-joke" in ancient sumerian.

Anyway, obviously god is testing us :kriwhat:
 
To be honest the Christian God is a jester. Remember the time he told the old men to cut the throat of his baby ? And then stopped him and said it was a joke ?
This story most likely represents them shifting away from child sacrifice (which we know was done by ither Semitic peoples)
The god from the bible is incredibly morally inconsistent.
God being all goody goody is a relatively recent interpretation. The God from the old testament is essentially like an authoritarian father figure.
 
Top