Suffering is a simple result of evolution. It's the result of physical electrical signals triggered by real phenomenon that goes to our brain and create an urge to avoid said trigger. This creates an illusion in our consciousness that we call suffering. This illusion in return can create real diverse physical reactions. After that, suffering can be simply used by animals to hurt other animals.
If suffering is electrical signals, what makes it different from an object, that is also made from electrical signals? And why shouldn't electrical signals be regarded as something that really exists?
“Because it is” I just demonstrated how it is not via the fact that current theories can later be falsified with new observations. Secondly science fails to empirically prove or explain intuitive/moral truths, so if you believe only with evidence you have a problem justifying your belief in the most basic intuitive truths.
It being a self improving system is one of the pros not a con” yeah maybe when it comes to understanding how the observable world works but not when it comes to realities that can’t be experimented on. Again science is inherently capped because it relies on dealing with empirical data and the observable world.
you’re going to be consistent you should also do away with believing in love, justice, evil, honesty and so on since they cannot be proven with empirical evidence. I’m basically trying to show you how utterly baseless it is to deny God’s existence with such a contradictory worldview.
Now moving on the question you asked, the belief in God is actually an innate intuition, one found in virtually every corner of the world, even young Japanese kids as young as 4 or 5 believe in God according to studies such as the “Children see the world as it is designed” study which showcased that kids in Japan believe in God as the originator/creator of the universe.
Were they indoctrinated already? We know Japan is like borderline atheist with some lingering Shintoism, with Shintoism not having any sort of creator in their theology
The same applies to moral views based in religion, due to different covenants and abrogation.
The impossibility of having any evidence either way doesnt mean accepting gods existence isnt baseless as well.
And even if there is such an intuition in humans, views about god vary alot in different cultures. This and the philosophical arguments then at best show the existence of some supernatural entity that started the universe that we cant really know anything about. Compared to that, specific god claims of the various religions are a stretch.
Also mind you that i still dont deny the existence of any supernatural entity or supernaturality. Im still not a materialist, nor do i subsribe to hard/strong atheism.
It is the freedom man reclaimed for himself. God is not a superhero and doesn't act like one, but reward and punishment will be given at the end. These Palestinians will be rewarded, if they lived according to his Word. 90% of the Israeli population approves the genocide, so you know how it will go down for them. Natural disasters are part of this life sadly, where they day of death and judgement can appear anytime. You are looking at this from an earthly and atheistic perspective, which doesn't make sense.
He isn't really beating you up, but giving you a shot at eternal life. You don't even have to be his child unless you want it, so it's your choice again. I understand that freedom of choice is hard to understand for left-wings extremists, but the Church is not Maoist China.
Our body are real (well, unless we are in a simulation, in which case we can make the case that the simulation is real and therefore our "sence of self" is real as well)
For the mind, it depends on how you define it. If you are talking about our imagination for example, it's indeed an illusion, a form of projection of what is really happening inside our brain.
Yeah.. for people to discuss the subject. But I know that I can keep myself from intervening on this subject lol
i'll try to tone down myself.
Our body are real (well, unless we are in a simulation, in which case we can make the case that the simulation is real and therefore our "sence of self" is real as well)
For the mind, it depends on how you define it. If you are talking about our imagination for example, it's indeed an illusion, a form of projection of what is really happening inside our brain.
Imagination is made of very real electrical signals. The brain's interpretation of painful stimuli is also electrical signals. In both cases they are very real, it happening inside your brain doesn't mean that it isn't real.
The physical interaction are real.
The interpretation of those signal for us as entity is not.
I made this metaphore a few week back:
Your mind is a movie theatre:
> The electricity is your energy and electric signals
> The projector is your brain
> The brand of the projector is the structure of your brain
> The movie is the combinaison of all the previous things before transforming into a consciousness. It's a combinasion in constant evolution
> The projection of the movie on the blank screen is your actual consciousness : your mind, thoughts, consciense, imagination
> The spectator sitted on the red seats is your will and sence of self, the illusion of consciousness.
What is not real is our agency. What is real on the other hand our experience and illusion of said agency.
Yup. It's made by electrical signals. But the feeling of having an imagination is an illusion the same way consciouness is.
Yes. That's what I'm explaining.
The physical interaction are real.
The interpretation of those signal for us as entity is not.
I made this metaphore a few week back:
Your mind is a movie theatre:
> The electricity is your energy and electric signals
> The projector is your brain
> The brand of the projector is the structure of your brain
> The movie is the combinaison of all the previous things before transforming into a consciousness. It's a combinasion in constant evolution
> The projection of the movie on the blank screen is your actual consciousness : your mind, thoughts, consciense, imagination
> The spectator sitted on the red seats is your will and sence of self, the illusion of consciousness.
What is not real is our agency. What is real on the other hand our experience and illusion of said agency.
The god from the bible is incredibly morally inconsistent.
Goodness by our own standards is based on "don't do onto others what you wouldn't like to be done to you" which I think connects directly to camaraderie and empathy.
We find ourselves in a pickle when we debate the morality of a potential God. Since if he is all good he can't be all powerful and vice-versa. Same thing if he was evil, since we have both good and evil in this world.
The god from the bible is incredibly morally inconsistent.
Goodness by our own standards is based on "don't do onto others what you wouldn't like to be done to you" which I think connects directly to camaraderie and empathy.
We find ourselves in a pickle when we debate the morality of a potential God. Since if he is all good he can't be all powerful and vice-versa. Same thing if he was evil, since we have both good and evil in this world.
To be honest the Christian God is a jester. Remember the time he told the old men to cut the throat of his baby ? And then stopped him and said it was a joke ? He shouldn't be taken seriously. After all, bible in reverse means "A great ass-joke" in ancient sumerian.
To be honest the Christian God is a jester. Remember the time he told the old men to cut the throat of his baby ? And then stopped him and said it was a joke ?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.