Status
Not open for further replies.
I mean, it makes sense to roleblock the watcher here lol. So if gad has been role blocked then nothing is contradicting here. If anything, it makes york vote on orca looks very oppurtunistic.
 
Okay Fuji came back to me and said that if a watcher targeted a player and no player visited the targeted player then they will be notified that 'No one visited your target'

The fact that Gad stated that he got no result, indicates that he has been blocked.
 
Okay Fuji came back to me and said that if a watcher targeted a player and no player visited the targeted player then they will be notified that 'No one visited your target'

The fact that Gad stated that he got no result, indicates that he has been blocked.
Which means no one is contradicting each other statement here.
 
I disagree. From what I can tell, most peoples PoEs today started with Gad and Orca at the bottom. Now, they have set things up so that "only one of them can be scum". I don't buy it.
Well, it seems that no one is contradicting one another here, gad most likely has been blocked if he is being truthful. What do you have to say now kiku?
 
Okay Fuji came back to me and said that if a watcher targeted a player and no player visited the targeted player then they will be notified that 'No one visited your target'

The fact that Gad stated that he got no result, indicates that he has been blocked.
You think scum has roleblocker AND rolecrusher separate? Saber was rolecrusher.

Still there's no scum (i assume) redirector, bus driver, vote silencer and there's no scum cop role.
 
Well, it seems that no one is contradicting one another here, gad most likely has been blocked if he is being truthful. What do you have to say now kiku?
If there's no contradiction, then I suppose my PoE goes back to how it was before the contradiction came up

Orca then Gad then Charlie. Wow! So different
 
I mean, it makes sense to roleblock the watcher here lol. So if gad has been role blocked then nothing is contradicting here. If anything, it makes york vote on orca looks very oppurtunistic.
I'm opportunistic for... believing the same thing you believed and acting accordingly? Can you get your head out of your own ass for a sec, please
 
You think scum has roleblocker AND rolecrusher separate? Saber was rolecrusher.

Still there's no scum (i assume) redirector, bus driver, vote silencer and there's no scum cop role.
Well, I am not sure. One thing that is pinging me though regarding Orca is the fact that he saw gad kinda contradict his statement and he did not vote his way at all lmao. You would think a townie orca would immediatly vote gad here.
 
If there's no contradiction, then I suppose my PoE goes back to how it was before the contradiction came up

Orca then Gad then Charlie. Wow! So different
Naa I don't think Gad is scum anymore, he would not come out and clarify that no one visited Polar, but he would let us assume what we were assuming and let orca get lynched here, if gad is scum. The fact that he clarified that he got no result etc actually looks good on him.
 
Naa I don't think Gad is scum anymore, he would not come out and clarify that no one visited Polar, but he would let us assume what we were assuming and let orca get lynched here, if gad is scum. The fact that he clarified that he got no result etc actually looks good on him.
I can work with Orca > Charlie > Gad but I cannot see a universe where anyone outside of these three is scum
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top