Controversial General Political Discussion

[NAMELESS]

I have "bald lives matter" campaign running on social media and both of you are welcome to join in future

Seriously men should talk more about male problems. Why is it we go silent about these things?

Post automatically merged: Nov 13, 2024

Wait what?

I need those genes running within your family ​

Native American genes, bro. His younger brother is 65 and still works as a mason doing heavy physical activity all day. He goes and comes back home on a bike too. Insane fitness.

 

[Reborn]

Seriously men should talk more about male problems. Why is it we got silent about these things?

First of all,

Getting bald isn't a problem.

Perceiving it as bad or as a problem, is a problem

​

 

[NAMELESS]

First of all,

Getting bald isn't a problem.

Perceiving it as bad or as a problem, is a problem

​

True. It's a sign of maturity and wisdom, right?we need to cope somehow

 

[Reborn]

True. It's a sign of maturity and wisdom, right?we need to cope somehow

^^^ I wish it's the sign of maturity and wisdom

But it's not. Saying it from my own personal experience
​

 

[Brush D. Teeth]

Actually, there is no bald man in my family. My dad is 75 and he barely has grey hair on his beard and head. I think i'm good.

They say you need to look at the mother's father.

 

[Zenos7]

Aren't these immigrants ethnic minorities?

But its not about them being ethnic minorities but them being illegals, is what im getting from reborns posts.

Probably trump just masking it like this though lol

 

[Poorsalino Cooker]

Shut the fuck up!!!!

 

[Reborn]

But its not about them being ethnic minorities but them being illegals, is what im getting from reborns posts.

Probably trump just masking it like this though lol

Yes!

When you use force to target someone based on their ethnicity to persecute or deport then it's ethnic cleansing.

Trump isn't deporting people based on ethnicity or race but based on their legality within the country.

Every country has limited resources to be shared and have laws in place. There is systematic process for outsiders to get into a country legally and contribute.

I have relatives and friends in US. I belong to a community which constitute 1% of US population but contributes 6-7% annually in US tax revenue which amounts to more than 300Billion $. And, even they share the same sentiments that migration should be controlled and legal.

And, I am not talking any nonsense. I have actually done a case study on a region which was affected by illegal migration for decades and how there was complete shift in socio-economic characteristics in that region including rise in tensions. In some places, things went so bad over decades that it became a lawless land and there were mass targetting of people by the people

So, anyone who supports illegal immigration are just completely ignorant and live in their own illusionary idealistic world.

 

[Blax Blah]

https://bsky.app/profile/nicktheancom.bsky.social/post/3kht7ddx6fg2v

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/anarchopac-means-and-ends

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/anarchopac-means-and-ends.pdf

Spoiler: A quote

Anarchists viewed seizing state power as a road that would lead the working class to a new form of authoritarian class society, rather than the intended goal of communism. To understand why we need to first understand what anarchists meant by the state. Through an in-depth analysis of the state as an actually-existing social structure, both historically and at the time they were writing, anarchists came to define the state as a hierarchical and centralized institution that uses professionally organized violence to perform the function of reproducing class rule. The state so understood was wielded by a political ruling class (generals, politicians, high ranking civil servants, monarchs, etc) in their own interests, and in the interests of the economic ruling class (capitalists, landlords, etc), against the masses. Kropotkin, for example, writes that the state “not only includes the existence of a power situated above society, but also of a territorial concentration and a concentration of many functions in the life of societies in the hands of a few... A whole mechanism of legislation and of policing is developed to subject some classes to the domination of other classes.” The state is therefore “the perfect example of a hierarchical institution, developed over centuries to subject all individuals and all of their possible groupings to the central will. The State is necessarily hierarchical, authoritarian — or it ceases to be the State.”[2]

Anarchists argued that the state, like all social structures, is constituted by forms of human activity and so participating in the state produces and reproduces particular kinds of people and particular kinds of social relations. This occurs irrespective of the intentions or goals of people because what matters is the nature of the social structure they are participating in and the forms of activity this social structure is constituted by and reproduced through. For Reclus, socialists who enter the state “have placed themselves in determinate conditions that in turn determine them.”[3] Those who wield state power will therefore engage in forms of human activity that will over time transform them into oppressors of the working class who are concerned with reproducing and expanding their power over other people. Anarchists held that this process of socialists being transformed into oppressors would occur both to socialists who are elected into the currently existing capitalist state and also to socialists who attempt to seize the existing state via a coup and transform it into a workers’ state.

Anarchists thought this would occur for two main reasons. Firstly, the state is a centralized and hierarchical institution in which a political ruling class monopolize decision making power and determine the lives of the majority who are subject to their rule. The minority of socialists who actually exercise state power will therefore impose decisions on and determine the lives of the working class, rather than enabling the working class to self-direct their own lives. In Malatesta’s words,

Whoever has power over things has power over men; whoever governs production also governs the producers; who determines consumption is master over the consumer. This is the question; either things are administered on the basis of free agreement among the interested parties, and this is anarchy; or they are administered according to laws made by administrators and this is government, it is the State, and inevitably it turns out to be tyrannical.[4]

Secondly, through engaging in the activity of wielding state power socialists will be corrupted by their position of authority at the top of a social hierarchy and be transformed into people who will neither want to nor try to abolish their own power over others. According to Reclus,

Anarchists contend that the state and all that it implies are not any kind of pure essence, much less a philosophical abstraction, but rather a collection of individuals placed in a specific milieu and subjected to its influence. Those individuals are raised up above their fellow citizens in dignity, power, and preferential treatment, and are consequently compelled to think themselves superior to the common people. Yet in reality the multitude of temptations besetting them almost inevitably leads them to fall below the general level.[5]

@Logiko

 

[Jesse Pinkman]

Lol Elon and Vivek got cucked so bad they didnt even get real department . Trump never rated Vivek and Elon was just piggy bank for donation .

 

[Logiko]

Mass deportations which Trump talked about is not akin to ethnical cleansing.

That would really be horrible if it was analyzed by international courts as an ethnical cleansing, right ?

First, ethinic cleansing means when majority forcibly target and removes another ethnic minority.

Which is exactly what would happen since Trump's project doesn't target white people but Latinos and black people.

Illegal undocumented migrants who are living unlawfully.


No one is stopping them to come back to US legally and live there

What's the difference between an undocumented resident and a legal one since they all pay taxes ?

First of all,

Getting bald isn't a problem.

Perceiving it as bad or as a problem, is a problem

You have a centrism problem mate.

When you use force to target someone based on their ethnicity to persecute or deport then it's ethnic cleansing.

Trump isn't deporting people based on ethnicity or race but based on their legality within the country.

Are you sure about that ?

Do you really believe in this lie ?

@Logiko

I'll try to check all those ressources later. I'm not currently concentrating on anarchic politic at the moment but I keep that ;)

 

[Reborn]

That would really be horrible if it was analyzed by international courts as an ethnical cleansing, right ?



Which is exactly what would happen since Trump's project doesn't target white people but Latinos and black people.



What's the difference between an undocumented resident and a legal one since they all pay taxes ?






You have a centrism problem mate.



Are you sure about that ?

Do you really believe in this lie ?



I'll try to check all those ressources later. I'm not currently concentrating on anarchic politic at the moment but I keep that ;)

First of all, thank you for not writing a wall of essay

Second.... nevermind

 

[Logiko]

You guyz are so screwed

 

[NAMELESS]

They say you need to look at the mother's father.

My grandma passed away this year at the age of 96.

Post automatically merged: Nov 13, 2024

mother's father.

Momma's dad died around 65 cause he smoked and drank too much(cancer).

 

[Brush D. Teeth]

. I belong to a community which constitute 1% of US population but contributes 6-7% annually in US tax revenue which amounts to more than 300Billion $. And, even they share the same sentiments that migration should be controlled and legal.

And, I am not talking any nonsense. I have actually done a case study on a region which was affected by illegal migration for decades and how there was complete shift in socio-economic characteristics in that region including rise in tensions. In some places, things went so bad over decades that it became a lawless land and there were mass targetting of people by the people

So, anyone who supports illegal immigration are just completely ignorant and live in their own illusionary idealistic world.

My grandma passed away this year at the age of 96.

Post automatically merged: Nov 13, 2024

Momma's dad died around 65 cause he smoked and drank too much(cancer).

I mean about hair loss.

 

[NAMELESS]

I mean about hair loss.

Yeah, none of my grandpas suffered any hair loss. There isn't close relative to me that is bald.

 

[Brush D. Teeth]

Yeah, none of my grandpas suffered any hair loss. There isn't close relative to me that is bald.

Head full of hair>>>Freedom of speech.
You're in no position to complain.

 

[Reborn]

Yeah, none of my grandpas suffered any hair loss. There isn't close relative to me that is bald.

Two of my friends said the same thing and they end up getting bald

Just saying

 

[NAMELESS]

Two of my friends said the same thing and they end up getting bald

Just saying

Post automatically merged: Nov 13, 2024

Head full of hair>>>Freedom of speech.
You're in no position to complain.

We are literally being tyrannized by a bald man.

 

[K!NG HARA$H!MA]

Not GWOT era,

We are back in 1050s