Controversial Is dating really as hard as some people say it is?
- Thread starter Monkey D Theories
- Start date
- Tags i will never t(h)rust a woman plap plap
"I could say a lot of things, but don't feel like offending a religion". This comment sounds like takings things personal imo.
I confused him with the "slave" comment. My bad. I wasn't implying you had to put up with disrespect or forget about your well being. I worded it badly.
Post automatically merged:
I confused him with the "slave" comment. My bad. I wasn't implying you had to put up with disrespect or forget about your well being. I worded it badly.
I actually address this in the below, Nameless:
I understood what you meant by "slave". I said: "Some would call that serving as if a slave; but it's different..." The fact is, the quote from the bible is about mutual owning of each other in a way that is respectful - not toxic. I said the response from Logiko was a heavy handed response to the word slave for a reason.
You messed up in your wording, but you weren't being toxic in what you meant. <3
I understood what you meant by "slave". I said: "Some would call that serving as if a slave; but it's different..." The fact is, the quote from the bible is about mutual owning of each other in a way that is respectful - not toxic. I said the response from Logiko was a heavy handed response to the word slave for a reason.
You messed up in your wording, but you weren't being toxic in what you meant. <3
One should never forget themselve in a relationship. This is always the beginning of a toxic one and someone under influence. Being present is not "forgeting ourselves", it's part of the relationship contract. Making effort is not something that must be exceptionnal, it's a requirement for a mutual benefit and it must be done on both part.
But never at the cost of your own health.
Never forget yourself in a relationship. It's a BASIC rule. And here I'm talking more to women than men.
1. Someone choosing willingly an inequal and patriarcal relationship doesn't mean it's a good choice
2. I'm mostly talking here about the case of women who choose to have a career.
3. If you are BOTH happy, good for you.
4. Maybe you should check this channel. Just in case.
It is what the word "slave" implies. The words should not be used to talk about relationships, it can lead people to believe things that are quite problematic. And there are people here who seem to need healthy advice.
No. As this would be called a sacrifice. This would not mean that you forget yourself but in this case that you want to save someone from danger. Which is a morally good action, even if it cost your life.
The problem comes when you forget yourself in a relationship and thus create a relationship of domination between yourself and the other partner.
Never said he said that either. I'm telling you guyz what the wording and the vision proposed imply. Nothing more.
-----
Also, do not be confused guyz. The fact that someone accept "willingly" a situation does NOT imply that said situation is good for them. Women have been accepting willingly toxic relationship to survive for centuries.
But never at the cost of your own health.
Never forget yourself in a relationship. It's a BASIC rule. And here I'm talking more to women than men.
1. Someone choosing willingly an inequal and patriarcal relationship doesn't mean it's a good choice
2. I'm mostly talking here about the case of women who choose to have a career.
3. If you are BOTH happy, good for you.
4. Maybe you should check this channel. Just in case.
It is what the word "slave" implies. The words should not be used to talk about relationships, it can lead people to believe things that are quite problematic. And there are people here who seem to need healthy advice.
No. As this would be called a sacrifice. This would not mean that you forget yourself but in this case that you want to save someone from danger. Which is a morally good action, even if it cost your life.
The problem comes when you forget yourself in a relationship and thus create a relationship of domination between yourself and the other partner.
Never said he said that either. I'm telling you guyz what the wording and the vision proposed imply. Nothing more.
-----
Also, do not be confused guyz. The fact that someone accept "willingly" a situation does NOT imply that said situation is good for them. Women have been accepting willingly toxic relationship to survive for centuries.
yeah,you explained while i was reading comments and cooking an answer.
"Never". Even if your partner just got into a serious accident and is now in the hospital? nahh, just go home and cook dinner. You need your time after all(irony). My guy, that is not how a healthy relationship works. This isn't like work where you put in X amount of hours and then your obligations are done. Common sense, plz.
Post automatically merged:
"Never". Even if your partner just got into a serious accident and is now in the hospital? nahh, just go home and cook dinner. You need your time after all(irony). My guy, that is not how a healthy relationship works. This isn't like work where you put in X amount of hours and then your obligations are done. Common sense, plz.
Yeah? So?
Again, nobody's endorsing toxic relationships. It's always been about a mutual bond, a shared feeling of love, trust and loyalty towards eachother. If one of them or both of them isn't being all of those three things, then yes, it is indeed a bad relationship and you should probably get the hell out of there.
Again, nobody's endorsing toxic relationships. It's always been about a mutual bond, a shared feeling of love, trust and loyalty towards eachother. If one of them or both of them isn't being all of those three things, then yes, it is indeed a bad relationship and you should probably get the hell out of there.
This sounds a whole lot like: My way is the only right way.
Who are you to cast shade on other people's decisions, bro? You're judging things you have little to no experience with.
My woman willingly became a housewife and asked me to do it - not the other way around.
She's now off anti-depressants and has a life where she can pursue her hobbies and interests, and in her words, "look after the man and home I love."
I despise that you can sum this up to be something not good for her (as per your final part) and that you call it an inequal position. SHE IS MY EQUAL. Don't look down on women as unequal just because they're not in the workforce.
Who are you to cast shade on other people's decisions, bro? You're judging things you have little to no experience with.
My woman willingly became a housewife and asked me to do it - not the other way around.
She's now off anti-depressants and has a life where she can pursue her hobbies and interests, and in her words, "look after the man and home I love."
I despise that you can sum this up to be something not good for her (as per your final part) and that you call it an inequal position. SHE IS MY EQUAL. Don't look down on women as unequal just because they're not in the workforce.