Controversial General Political Discussion

[Jesse Pinkman]

Mate.. I have absolutely no hate. I literally do not even hate Netanyahou. I have the priviledge of being able not to hate. Angry ? Yes a lot. Hate ? Never.

My description of Trump is factual. It's related to his vision and the way he proceeds and based on what we know of fascism and the far right. It's a cold and educated assertion, not something that comes from some kind of anger of hate. Trump, Musk and many others are crypto-fascists with a tendancy with libertarianism, it's factual. But I guess you will have to see that for yourself.

Now.. Do you think that the population making the Nazi Salute in Nazi germany under Hitler was aware she was making they were saluting fascism and the ideology behind the extermination of 17 Million people ? Nah... Just like people at the moment making the Trump dance do not understand what kind of potentially harmfull ideology they are promoting by making this little dance.

But hey.. I hope that I'm wrong and no people will die because of Trump's mandate..

Trump is Hitler 2.0 is steadfast old now . There were no wars in his previous regime and he tried to make good deals for Middle East . Joe ruined every single thing when he came back .

I think he’ll do fine , he wants to end Ukraine wars which is key at the moment , Biden has created mess with this war I think it’s enough Russia is key strategic partner to EU as well .

 

[Zemmi]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14097949/donald-trump-morning-joe-mar-lago-boycott.html

But the president-elect told Fox News that he took the meeting because in order to 'Make America Great Again, it is very important, if not vital, to have a free, fair and open media or press.'
'I am not looking for retribution, grandstanding or to destroy people who treated me very unfairly,' he added.
Trump said Scarborough requested the meeting and that pair traveled to Palm Beach, Florida, to meet on Friday morning at Mar-a-Lago.
'Many things were discussed, and I very much appreciated the fact that they wanted to have open communication,' he said. 'In many ways, it's too bad that it wasn't done long ago.'

Yeah... he seems so scary.

 

[Logiko]

Trump is Hitler 2.0 is steadfast old now . There were no wars in his previous regime and he tried to make good deals for Middle East . Joe ruined every single thing when he came back .

I think he’ll do fine , he wants to end Ukraine wars which is key at the moment , Biden has created mess with this war I think it’s enough Russia is key strategic partner to EU as well .

Tell me. What does Trump want to do with Israel and its genocide in Gaza and its bombarment of Lebanon ?

to have a free, fair and open media or press.

Do you mean that twitter - as twitter is a form of media - should not be owned by a Billionnaire and be open source ?

Wouldn't it be more free and fair if channels like CNN or Fox News were not owned by Billionnaires, but owned by the public ?

----------

You know what @Reborn you are right on something. I do try to use the socratian dialectic approach.. but the problem - and I think I now understand the flaw in my argumentation - is that I uses it as a rethorical weapon and a way to trick my opponent rather than something created with the principle of respecting my interlocutor and having a sane debate. This is mainly due to the irrespect I have for people voting for far right Ideas.

While the respect will not magically reappear. I'll still try to work on asking more open and transparent questions and train myself to be dive even deeper in this kind of action. I modified the last two questions to make them less conflictual.

 

[Daniel]

Do you mean that twitter - as twitter is a form of media - should not be owned by a Billionnaire and be open source ?

Major media sites (including social media sites) are going to be owned by someone of affluence a huge site that at least hundreds of millions of people use will always have tremendous monetary value, much like any other major fortune 500 company, yes.

 

[Logiko]

Major media sites (including social media sites) are going to be owned by someone of affluence a huge site that at least hundreds of millions of people use will always have tremendous monetary value, much like any other major fortune 500 company, yes.

There is a difference with thinking that sites like twitter have a tremendous monetary values and thinking that they should not be open source.

Plus, Bluesky is 21 Million big at the moment, which is huge and yet, even if there are owners, it's open source.

 

[Daniel]

There is a difference with thinking that sites like twitter have a tremendous monetary values and thinking that they should not be open source.

Plus, Bluesky is 21 Million big at the moment, which is huge and yet, even if there are owners, it's open source.

Bluesky? The site that's been getting spammed with mass reports from its users not even a month after this year's presidential election?
https://x.com/visegrad24/status/1857930447176524069
Apparently the sheer number of these reports have been overwhelming the staff currently working there too.

But I don't use these social media sites all that much, I don't prefer to get reportspammed every other post I make either.

 

[Logiko]

Bluesky? The site that's been getting spammed with mass reports from its users not even a month after this year's presidential election?
https://x.com/visegrad24/status/1857930447176524069
Apparently the sheer number of these reports have been overwhelming the staff currently working there too.

Which is normal. This site is currently having the biggest rise of users and tanking the consequences of the lack of moderation of twitter.

Don't worry about the staff, they will do their job. And don't worry about the reports, they are perfectly normal. It's time that anti-democrats and problematic people understand that they are not welcomed in normal and safe spaces and their hurtfull rethoric is not ok.

If those people want to stay toxic together, they have Xwitter. Meanwhile, we will have our nice and open source plateform.

---

Now.. what type of plateform would you prefer ?

The one where there is "total" freedom, owned by a billionnaire, without moderation, with bots all over the place or.. an open source plateform, that will take more time to be moderated, but will be much safer for all ?

 

[Jesse Pinkman]

Tell me. Does what does Trump want to do with Israel and its genocide in Gaza and its bombarment of Lebanon ?


Do you mean that twitter - as twitter is a form of media - should not be owned by a Billionnaire and be open source ?

Wouldn't it be more free and fair if channels like CNN or Fox News were not owned by Billionnaires, but owned by the public ?

----------

You know what @Reborn you are right on something. I do try to use the socratian dialectic approach.. but the problem - and I think I now understand the flaw in my argumentation - is that I uses it as a rethorical weapon and a way to trick my opponent rather than something created with the principle of respecting my interlocutor and having a sane debate. This is mainly due to the irrespect I have for people voting for far right Ideas.

While the respect will not magically reappear. I'll still try to work on asking more open and transparent questions and train myself to be dive even deeper in this kind of action. I modified the last two questions to make them less conflictual.

Supporting Israel is official stance of US Govt Foreign policy nothing to do with Trump . No difference even if Kamala was elected .

 

[Logiko]

Supporting Israel is official stance of US Govt Foreign policy nothing to do with Trump . No difference even if Kamala was elected .

Do you think it would be easier for anti genocide leftists to push Trump to stop helping Israel rather than pushing Harris?

 

[Blax Blah]

Tell me. What does Trump want to do with Israel and its genocide in Gaza and its bombarment of Lebanon ?


Do you mean that twitter - as twitter is a form of media - should not be owned by a Billionnaire and be open source ?

Wouldn't it be more free and fair if channels like CNN or Fox News were not owned by Billionnaires, but owned by the public ?

----------

You know what @Reborn you are right on something. I do try to use the socratian dialectic approach.. but the problem - and I think I now understand the flaw in my argumentation - is that I uses it as a rethorical weapon and a way to trick my opponent rather than something created with the principle of respecting my interlocutor and having a sane debate. This is mainly due to the irrespect I have for people voting for far right Ideas.

While the respect will not magically reappear. I'll still try to work on asking more open and transparent questions and train myself to be dive even deeper in this kind of action. I modified the last two questions to make them less conflictual.

I think these three videos may be really good

Post automatically merged: Saturday at 10:14 AM

There is a difference with thinking that sites like twitter have a tremendous monetary values and thinking that they should not be open source.

Plus, Bluesky is 21 Million big at the moment, which is huge and yet, even if there are owners, it's open source.

I think all software must be free software for it to not be malicious, and this is what I mean by free software, free as in freedom, not free as in price:

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html

"
A program is free software if the program's users have the four essential freedoms: [1]

• The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose (freedom 0).
• The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does your computing as you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
• The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help others (freedom 2).
• The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others (freedom 3). By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for this."

I think it has to be free software for it to not me malicious because if it isn't free then you do not really know what the program is doing, and you also don't control it, which can and many many times has lead to users being harmed by things like data collection,

Post automatically merged: Saturday at 10:16 AM

And also I have a bluesky account if you want to message me there, same username,

Post automatically merged: Saturday at 10:34 AM

Bluesky? The site that's been getting spammed with mass reports from its users not even a month after this year's presidential election?
https://x.com/visegrad24/status/1857930447176524069
Apparently the sheer number of these reports have been overwhelming the staff currently working there too.

But I don't use these social media sites all that much, I don't prefer to get reportspammed every other post I make either.

These are the type of lists for blocking that I have used:

You can see from this person's list section:
https://bsky.app/profile/skywatch.blue

https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:pmyqirafcp3jqdhrl7crpq7t/lists/3kn6pvyceas2r

 

[Zemmi]

Do you think it would be easier for anti genocide leftists to push Trump to stop helping Israel rather than pushing Harris?

The problem with Kamala is she would've never taken a stance. She is the person who had pro-Palestine commercials in one state and pro-Israel in another. Plus, I don't think she would've been in control anyway. It would be the same puppet masters that Biden has.

 

[Blax Blah]

I started to read what is property and it's really fun, you should check it out if you want to

https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/proudhon/property/ch01.htm

 

[AL sama]

@Brush D. Teeth look at this

If Trump dance goes viral in Russia then that would be super crazy lol

he is banned from the thread

 

[Blax Blah]

he is banned from the thread

Did anything happen?,

 

[AL sama]

Did anything happen?,

no we just love to ban users for no reason

 

[Blax Blah]

no we just love to ban users for no reason

I just didn't know what happened,

 

[AL sama]

I just didn't know what happened,

you should ask what happened instead of did anything happen lol

he said something he shouldn't have and got banned

 

[Blax Blah]

you should ask what happened instead of did anything happen lol

he said something he shouldn't have and got banned

Sorry, it's just an expression I use,

 

[Mashiro Blue]

As a wise man once said, the best politics are no politics

 

[Logiko]

As a wise man once said, the best politics are no politics

That's the opposite of wise.

I think all software must be free software for it to not be malicious, and this is what I mean by free software, free as in freedom, not free as in price:

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html

"
A program is free software if the program's users have the four essential freedoms: [1]

• The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose (freedom 0).
• The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does your computing as you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
• The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help others (freedom 2).
• The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others (freedom 3). By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for this."

I think it has to be free software for it to not me malicious because if it isn't free then you do not really know what the program is doing, and you also don't control it, which can and many many times has lead to users being harmed by things like data collection,

I agree

The problem with Kamala is she would've never taken a stance. She is the person who had pro-Palestine commercials in one state and pro-Israel in another. Plus, I don't think she would've been in control anyway. It would be the same puppet masters that Biden has.

I don't remember her having any pro-palestinian stance.

She was always against stopping arming Israel. There is no "puppet", there is simply people who are ideologically biased no to change their mind on this conflict.

He would have far more chances to makes Harris change her viewpoint than Trump, now Palestinians are screwed. Thanks to those who voted him in power.

There is blood on the hands of Trump voters as they clearly expressed the refusal to do something against the help toward Israel.

I think these three videos may be really good

I'll try to wa tch this later :)