Powers & Abilities Debunking Literally Every Argument Against Ryokugyu’s Black Blade UPDATE: Remembering The Fallen

[Mr. Anderson]

It seems you are coping and have no arguments

It's yall headcanon vs. him literally having a fucking black blade on his hip.

This is the official coloring on his Vivre Card fellas.

I'm going to go with what's on panel literally everytime. Y'all are in no position to tell me about "cope and no arguments", when one of your counters is trying to convince me that the Black Blade is actually a wooden sword made from his devil fruit ability among other nonesense that I won't repeat.

Post automatically merged: Today at 11:01 AM

Worstgen is literally the only forum on the net where I'm seeing literal cope and denial on it being a Black Blade after confirmation.

Everywhere else? The worst of it is people suggesting that Aramaki didn't turn in his black and stole it from somewhere. Which is a better form of denial that whatever the fuck y'all are trying to attempt here😂.

 

[Cruxroux]

Worstgen is literally the only forum on the net where I'm seeing literal cope and denial on it being a Black Blade after confirmation.

It's literally everywhere lmao.

 

[Mr. Anderson]

It's literally everywhere lmao.

On the level of these posts? I havent seen it lol. Maybe i missed them among the majority that more said Aramaki didn't make the blade black himself.

 

[CbShadow]

We know the biscuit soldier swords are fake. Why you're comparing it to the literal Black Blade on Aramaki's hip is beyond me.


How the other's handle their blades is irrelevant. Greenbull has a black blade on his hip dude lol.

You don't have proof GB weapon is a black blade. Claiming his weapon is a black blade is not proof it's a black blade. Especially since I have proven with manga facts weapons can be different than what they appear to be.

How Oda handles GB weapon is very relevant. Since Oda handled GB weapon different than the way he handled known black blades means he has deviated from his standard pattern and for they reason we should ask ourselves why he handled it differently. You refused to do that because it goes against your agenda.

They look like swords cause they are exact replicas of an actual sword that Cracker has on his person.

GB could have creative a weapon based off a black blade because that is the type of weapon he wish he could create. Or it could be to mock Wano samurais, the people he hate. There are a lot of possibility.

He also kind of shot himself in the foot there because since Cracker is able to make biscuit swords then why carry a real sword to begin with?, since that's his argument for Aramaki. Also why keep it on your person when you can just spawn it mid fight and catch your opponent off guard?. Unless he believes that some random commander is more likely to carry a real meito sword and be somewhat proficient at it than a literal top tier who would be facing far stronger foes with apparently a "sword" made of wood that we already know is very much cuttable.

Shooting yourself in the foot is basing your entire argument on just the weapon appearance. Now since I have successfully challenged and defeated that argument you all are in panic mode.

We know Cracker created biscuit armor, biscuit soldiers and biscuit weapons because he's an artist and uses it to hide his true identity. He has a real sword in case somebody defeats his biscuit armor, weapon, and soldiers. That's Cracker not GB, the character who used a wooden club as a child and now has a wood DF power.

Why can't GB use a wooden sword because he used one as a child, he likes using wooden weapon and it goes perfectly with his df power. Why does GB have to have a black blade other than to satisfy your agenda?

Why are you talking about a meito sword when you are the one pushing a black blade. Black blades are stronger than normal meito blades. If a top tier was going to create a fake sword wouldn't it make more sense for him to create a fake black blade or does that make too much sense.

Not all wood have the same hardness. Over half of WB weapon is wood yet it was never cut or broken. The databook stated the weapon was able to withstand the power WB channeled through it because of its durability.

Believing GB can't create a wooden sword made from hard wood is foolish. Let's not forget haki can be added to increased the weapons hardness.

 

[Mr. Anderson]

You don't have proof GB weapon is a black blade.

Imma stop you right there chief. This thread is literally about the proof.

>The Black and White manga its a Blade Blade.
>The Colored Manga it's a Black Blade.
>His official Vivre Card? Black Blade agaim.

The evidence speaks for itself. If your concerns are the fact he didn't use it or it wasn't made a big deal of? Oda is keeping all of that lowkey until his actual official narrative driven fight. Like he does for literally every character he writes. You're not convincing nobody with the wooden blade idiocy.

 

[Dragon777]

It's yall headcanon vs. him literally having a fucking black blade on his hip.

This is the official coloring on his Vivre Card fellas.

I'm going to go with what's on panel literally everytime. Y'all are in no position to tell me about "cope and no arguments", when one of your counters is trying to convince me that the Black Blade is actually a wooden sword made from his devil fruit ability among other nonesense that I won't repeat.

Post automatically merged: Today at 11:01 AM

Worstgen is literally the only forum on the net where I'm seeing literal cope and denial on it being a Black Blade after confirmation.

Everywhere else? The worst of it is people suggesting that Aramaki didn't turn in his black and stole it from somewhere. Which is a better form of denial that whatever the fuck y'all are trying to attempt here😂.

Outside people don't care as much.

 

[Mr. Anderson]

Outside people don't care as much.

Im a actual fan and I don't care. It isnt even that big of a deal that he has one or not. The more the merrier. His forest abilities leave alot to be desired. It makes alot of sense that his full power will lay elsewhere. It's not like he's going to have ACoC or anything, a black blade is a cool addition and the least of it. He's still a top tier regardless, so this just makes him cooler.

 

[Dragon777]

Im a actual fan and I don't care. It isnt even that big of a deal that he has one or not. The more the merrier. His forest abilities leave alot to be desired. It makes alot of sense that his full power will lay elsewhere. It's not like he's going to have ACoC or anything, a black blade is a cool addition and the least of it. He's still a top tier regardless, so this just makes him cooler.

I agree, even though I think he Is going to have ACoC as any top tier.

Tbh, outside of places like this fans are much more...casual on this thing. When Ryo's BB will be confirmed explicitly, more discussions are bound to born.

For now it Is a big thing only in theory.

 

[Sentinel]

Shooting yourself in the foot is basing your entire argument on just the weapon appearance. Now since I have successfully challenged and defeated that argument you all are in panic mode.

Um, no?

First of all, Cracker is a craftsman. Like, in the very panel which you provided as your set of "evidence" when it comes to questioning the legitimacy of Ryo's black blade, Cracker explained that it was red jam which his biscuit soldier was spitting out before. So the image of his biscuit swords are not only replicas of his real sword, they're meant to resemble his real sword as much as possible because Cracker is the type of person who insists on keeping the smallest bits of detail in his creations.

Post automatically merged: Today at 12:03 PM

We know Cracker created biscuit armor, biscuit soldiers and biscuit weapons because he's an artist and uses it to hide his true identity. He has a real sword in case somebody defeats his biscuit armor, weapon, and soldiers. That's Cracker not GB, the character who used a wooden club as a child and now has a wood DF power.

Oh, you even gave the reason to why Cracker's swords look that identical.

Bolded part is the one where it's supposed to show your flaw of comparison by bringing up two different characters and their entire motives to what they're acting like. Cracker isn't GB, so how does it matter?

Why can't GB use a wooden sword because he used one as a child, he likes using wooden weapon and it goes perfectly with his df power. Why does GB have to have a black blade other than to satisfy your agenda?

How about you simply WAIT till the manga reveals his actual in-depth character, his flashback (if there's a flashback) or when he draws his weapon against the opponent who's gonna beat him?

Also, I mean, he uses a wooden sword as a kid and so it means he uses one as an adult? That's not a reason. Besides, we've already seen how Oda draws wooden swords. Look up at the recent chapters for example.

 

[CbShadow]

Imma stop you right there chief. This thread is literally about the proof.

>The Black and White manga its a Blade Blade.
>The Colored Manga it's a Black Blade.
>His official Vivre Card? Black Blade agaim.

The evidence speaks for itself. If your concerns are the fact he didn't use it or it wasn't made a big deal of? Oda is keeping all of that lowkey until his actual official narrative driven fight. Like he does for literally every character he writes. You're not convincing nobody with the wooden blade idiocy.

None of that is proof.

This is proof of a black blade.

That is evidence. You don't have evidence.

Since I provided evidence weapon can be difficult than what they appeared to be claiming GB weapon is a black blade off its appearance is not evidence it's a black blade.

 

[Dragon777]

That is evidence. You don't have evidence.

Lol, again:

"In this case It's proof only if It's called a BB"

 

[mly90]

None of that is proof.

This is proof of a black blade.

That is evidence. You don't have evidence.

Since I provided evidence weapon can be difficult than what they appeared to be claiming GB weapon is a black blade off its appearance is not evidence it's a black blade.

Exactly if twerkbull was one of them he wouldn't be df merchant first of all he would also flex with it use it in combat
What swordsman of that caliber would embarrass himself this way for example relying on ugly broccoli form instead of using his so called kokuto to block this

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

LadmiraLs

 

[Dragon777]

Exactly if twerkbull was one of them he wouldn't be df merchant first of all he would also flex with it use it in combat
What swordsman of that caliber would embarrass himself this way for example relying on ugly broccoli form instead of using his so called kokuto to block this

Maybe the one stopped by Vista

But no, Is the AdvCoC cheap shot by the daughter of Kaido the problem

 

[Vanlax]

"Without subtlety a sword is but an iron bar."
-WSS

Can't wait for Aramaki's swordsmanship.

 

[mly90]

"Without subtlety a sword is but an iron bar."
-WSS

Can't wait for Aramaki's swordsmanship.

Man is preaching about highest level of swordsmanship it's first thing he did in his intro

 

[Dragon777]

"Without subtlety a sword is but an iron bar."
-WSS

Can't wait for Aramaki's swordsmanship.

You'll/we'll see .

 

[Owl Ki]

GB could have creative a weapon based off a black blade because that is the type of weapon he wish he could create. Or it could be to mock Wano samurais, the people he hate. There are a lot of possibility.

You are arguing a bunch of hypotheticals that couldn't possibly be proven until maybe (but probably not) revealed much later in the story to argue against the current evidence that is actually present.

Everything so far points to it being a Black Blade. The examples you provide as to why it might not be a black Blade aren't convincing.

The only real example of a weapon not being what it appears to be is Who's Who's comically small dagger. It fits with him being a former secret agent that would have used trickery to one up opponents. Funny thing is, Who's Who is using it exactly as he would use a sword anyway because his Rokushiki skill set allows him to have greater range than whatever he is physically wielding. Like Rokushiki makes Zoro think of Kaku as a four blade swordsman because Kaku can just flat out use his limbs as blades.

Fujitora's cane was always going to obviously be a cane sword. Cane swords are famous, Fujitora has a samurai aesthetic and his entire character design is based on Shintaro Katsu's portrayal of the famous fictional blind swordsman Zatoichi. The actual subversive creative decision would have been to make Fujitora's cane just a cane.

The Fujitora example is especially dangerous for you to use because his entire character is an homage to an actor's portrayal of a fictional swordsman.... Which is what Aramaki's character is as well. Aramaki's character not being a swordsman with a sword would again be like Fujitora's cane not being a sword. It ruins the obvious cultural homage.

Cracker's "fake" swords are functionally just swords. Swords not made out of metal, sure but they are functionally swords that are exact replicas of a metal sword anyway.

That last one with Cracker really kills the entire thought process because there can just functionally be non-metal swords that act exactly like swords. Pump enough haki into it and it is a Black Blade.

All your other arguments are "what if" arguments against "what is" arguments.

What if?: "What if it's made out of wood? What if Greenbull is mocking samurai? What if Greenbull just has a fake one cause he is insecure?"

What is?: "Greenbull is carrying a sword, a blade if you will. It is black in colour in all drawn media, a black blade if you will. Chances are, it is probably a Black Blade."

You are literally just inventing stuff with the "what if?" arguments.

Hey, what if Greenbull's sword was actually made of the bones of his dead former Cipher Pol agent girlfriend who died while she had her Rokushiki activated thus giving her bones the properties of steel thus allowing her bones to be melted down and reforged into a blade for Aramaki to smite his enemies with? What a what if, huh?

See, I can pull fanfiction out of my arse too. Now try arguing against Aramaki's thematically unique girlfriend metal bone sword.

 

[Fleet Leader Fenaker]

It's yall headcanon vs. him literally having a fucking black blade on his hip.

This is the official coloring on his Vivre Card fellas.

" Fucking Black Blade "

Jupiter's hair was drawn in yellow color in the official translation yet it was presented in Oda's cover page where he colors his characters himself in white color.

Oda drew the flag of the Marines in Black yet they colored it in White lmao.

I'm going to go with what's on panel literally everytime. Y'all are in no position to tell me about "cope and no arguments", when one of your counters is trying to convince me that the Black Blade is actually a wooden sword made from his devil fruit ability among other nonesense that I won't repeat.

Show us a confirmation it's a black blade which is funny, and what's more funny is the fact that Aramaki's actor had a black sheath and not a black blade similar to what's seen in Fuji's actor movie :

So keep coping lmao

 

[GalaxyLevelShanks]

Zboy cope is truly reaching unprecedented levels