How strong is EOS Sanji?


  • Total voters
    253
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I guarantee the Gaban = Rayleigh = Roger line was said by Ripley, Collon, or some other guy who has no idea what they’re talking about and is simply glazing Gaban.

Gaban = Roger was never implied in the manga and was outright contradicted by Buggy’s statement that Roger’s only equal was WB.
Roger’s equal may be Whitebeard, doesn’t mean there can’t be others who stand on their level like Rayleigh and Gaban
 
I guarantee the Gaban = Rayleigh = Roger line was said by Ripley, Collon, or some other guy who has no idea what they’re talking about and is simply glazing Gaban.

Gaban = Roger was never implied in the manga and was outright contradicted by Buggy’s statement that Roger’s only equal was WB.
It is glazing probably, this is spoiler hype after all. The translations will probably clarify that he means in the same league as Roger/Rayleigh which is undoubtedly true
 
I had recently shifted from Sanji beating an Admiral/Gorosei EOS (cant blame me his showing in Egghead was atrocious specially with him getting only an ouch from Luffy by using his strongest attack) but this Gaban portrayal and him paralleling Sanji has changed my view.
 
He didn’t kick him at all? He just used his fire to burn Luffy.

You get that when Sanji kicks someone with hells memories they are engulfed in flames, it’s clear why Sanji physically can’t do that (it’s not holding back, Oda wrote Sanjis body is physically incapable of hurting a girl)
Why would he just use his fire to burn Luffy? How would that help at all what they were trying to accomplish in that scene?

Also your second paragraph makes no sense. Your claims so far:
- Sanji didn't touch Luffy physically or he would have burnt Bonney.
- Sanji only used fire and burnt Luffy's massive body all over.
- The reason why Sanji didn't burn Bonney despite burning Luffy all over is that he's pysically incapable of hurting a girl... which invalidates my first claim.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top