That you're not a doctor choosing between 2 patients, why the drama?
It has nothing to do with a doctor. It's about the principle of choosing between to bad choices.
Bears explains that I have no empathy for people who have secondary effects of vaccines, because I'm saying that we must take into account the benefit/risk balance to make the choice (it's the fact that vaccines are very few chances to create secondary effect, and that thoses effect are fewer enough to balance the benefit of the risk of not taking the vaccine)...
I'm replying that it's not about empathy, but choosing the situation that creates more possibility of success and less risks. Just like a doctor who has to choose between saving two patients that are dying.
Soros: Financing femminism, abortion, gun control, taxation.
Worstgen philosopher: Soros is a liberal.
Those are not leftists things, those are just normal things. Not doing those is fascistic.
and Yes, he is a liberal. A capitalistic one. If he was a leftists, he would not be a billionnaire mate. Think for two minutes please.
You have a hard time understanding the political spectrum and you don't understand that if Georges Soros is a "woke radical communist" then.. what does it makes me when I'm 100 times more radical ? And what does it make a pacific revolutionnary that is 100 time more radical than me ? And what does it make a non pacific revolutionnary that is 100 time more radical than them ?
You are so focused on anti-leftism that you don't see what is really leftism and that your fear of it is irrationnal.
I've only scrapped and shared the surface of what leftism was on this forum. I shared the most basic ideas. There is so much that you don't know and don't understand.
Things that you have never even heard about.
ok
