Powers & Abilities Haki specialist
- Thread starter warsame zaylai
- Start date
I am not, I am just using Erkek's argument against himself. 
How does WB>Mihawk prove WB>Oden? Another headcanon of yours?
I am basically telling you that WB has WSM title over someone who you think is stronger than Oden.
Crazy how Lik is crying for pages just to not take his usual L from his superior.
Do you want me to list the Ls you took against me again?
You are saying Oden > Mihawk?
What about burakku buradu?
What about burakku buradu?
Did Haki user Zolo use ''NAMED ATTACK'' without Haki vs Monet?
1- Haki isn't part of swordsmanship confirmed.
2- Haki isn't part of swordsmanship again confirmed when Alber said he isn't swordsman but uses Haki with sword, and Roger despite having best haki and also uses sword but not WGS.
So Lik boy, WB > Mihawk but not WB > Oden?
Honestly Lik, if you are pretending to have low IQ then its a good act if you aren't pretending then its bad news for you.
I am basically telling you that WB has WSM title over someone who you think is stronger than Oden.
Crazy how Lik is crying for pages just to not take his usual L from his superior.
Do you want me to list the Ls you took against me again?
Lik is simply crying since I debunked his ass with WB > Mihawk, since he believes Mihawk > Oden, but he thinks that doesn't prove WB > Oden, crazy usual Lik
Did Haki user Zolo use ''NAMED ATTACK'' without Haki vs Monet?
1- Haki isn't part of swordsmanship confirmed.
2- Haki isn't part of swordsmanship again confirmed when Alber said he isn't swordsman but uses Haki with sword, and Roger despite having best haki and also uses sword but not WGS.
Honestly Lik, if you are pretending to have low IQ then its a good act if you aren't pretending then its bad news for you.
I am basically telling you that WB has WSM title over someone who you think is stronger than Oden.
Crazy how Lik is crying for pages just to not take his usual L from his superior.
Do you want me to list the Ls you took against me again?
Lik is simply crying since I debunked his ass with WB > Mihawk, since he believes Mihawk > Oden, but he thinks that doesn't prove WB > Oden, crazy usual Lik
Did Haki user Zolo use ''NAMED ATTACK'' without Haki vs Monet?
1- Haki isn't part of swordsmanship confirmed.
2- Haki isn't part of swordsmanship again confirmed when Alber said he isn't swordsman but uses Haki with sword, and Roger despite having best haki and also uses sword but not WGS.
Why are the zoros teachers teaching him haki then ?
Alber never once said he wasn't
Said he loved sword duels and his vc said he is a swordsman
Mihawk: "If you´d infused them with HAKI, those SWORDS would not have broken"
"Every weapon can be turned into a BLACK BLADE LIKE MINE"
Lerkek: "haki and swrdoskills are different"
"Strongest swordsman in the world has nothing to do with haki"
No more than any other skill type does.
Which means it's not a sword skill. The fact that there is an argument being made about this is stupid to begin with.
No more than any other skill type does.
Which means it's not a sword skill. The fact that there is an argument being made about this is stupid to begin with.
Which means it's not a sword skill. The fact that there is an argument being made about this is stupid to begin with.
But to be the most powerful swordsman in the world, you need all these things, which is what Mihawk's haters want to deny. To think that the title is only having the highest skill with the sword lol
And it doesn't mean that the one who has more haki is more powerful, of course I don't agree with that. I defend that all stats, skills and so on have their weight, it is a sum, and the one that is the highest is the most powerful.
Even if we assume that Shanks has a haki superior to Mihawk, superior in all 3 hakis as well. But Mihawk is still the most powerful swordsman in the world. It means that for Mihawk's sum to be superior or at least equal, it must be superior in dexterity, strength, speed, etc. Making enough of a difference to make up for that difference in haki and win the fight.
Post automatically merged:
Best of all, what Lerkan defends, that Mihawk's title does not contemplate using haki, Zoro's fight must be without haki. If Zoro wins using haki, he will not be able to win the title, because he will have defeated Mihawk using something that should not be valid.
And of course, it is logical, since his way of thinking is that Zoro's title and dream is not to be the most powerful swordsman in the world, but to be the most skilled. So you don't need haki, strength, agility or speed, stamina, defense or durability. Even a talented child could be one xD.
Last edited:
You are saying Oden > Mihawk?
What about burakku buradu?
What about burakku buradu?
I am not, I am just using Erkek's argument against himself.
Right, right but where your logic fails is that WB doesn't have the WSM title over Oden.
And your whole argument falls apart. So, back to square one - can you prove WB>primeOden or not?
And your whole argument falls apart. So, back to square one - can you prove WB>primeOden or not?
''strength''
you got debunked.
Lets see you cry here as well;
https://worstgen.alwaysdata.net/forum/threads/wb-vs-oden-vs-mihawk.66725/
Lets see you argue WB > Mihawk but not WB > Oden
Same reason why non-DF Rayleigh showing Luffy DF skills, or non-swordsman learning Haki, its because to make him more powerful overall as a fighter and protect his weapon just like other fighters protect their weapons by using Haki. Literally Mihawk tells Zolo, he needs to learn Haki because he needs to protect his sword from damages, basically same logic as why every other fighter need to learn Haki to protect themselves.
Alber can be swordsman and then not be swordsman, its up to him. There is no rule like that you are either swordsman or not lmao, swordsmanship is not a type of distinction like human or not human. Swordsmanship is just 1 of the many other fighting styles, marksman, martial artist, DF user, swordsmanship etc etc.
Haki user Zolo used ''NAMED ATTACK'' without Haki, thats swordsmanship, which Haki is not included.
Haki isn't included in a named sword attack. WGS title doesn't include Haki.
This is what WGS and Swordsmanship is about, since you ZKKfans like ''NAMED ATTACK'' argument, this debunked you
No more than any other skill type does.
Which means it's not a sword skill. The fact that there is an argument being made about this is stupid to begin with.
Which means it's not a sword skill. The fact that there is an argument being made about this is stupid to begin with.
Its basically proven that Haki isn't included in WGS title.
What argument is that? You got debunked and crying.
Yes he has over Oden but not over Roger, thats why he got that title after Roger died;
''strength''
you got debunked.
Lets see you cry here as well;
https://worstgen.alwaysdata.net/forum/threads/wb-vs-oden-vs-mihawk.66725/
Lets see you argue WB > Mihawk but not WB > Oden
Same reason why non-DF Rayleigh showing Luffy DF skills, or non-swordsman learning Haki, its because to make him more powerful overall as a fighter and protect his weapon just like other fighters protect their weapons by using Haki. Literally Mihawk tells Zolo, he needs to learn Haki because he needs to protect his sword from damages, basically same logic as why every other fighter need to learn Haki to protect themselves.
Alber can be swordsman and then not be swordsman, its up to him. There is no rule like that you are either swordsman or not lmao, swordsmanship is not a type of distinction like human or not human. Swordsmanship is just 1 of the many other fighting styles, marksman, martial artist, DF user, swordsmanship etc etc.
Haki user Zolo used ''NAMED ATTACK'' without Haki, thats swordsmanship, which Haki is not included.
Haki isn't included in a named sword attack. WGS title doesn't include Haki.
This is what WGS and Swordsmanship is about, since you ZKKfans like ''NAMED ATTACK'' argument, this debunked you
Zolo used ''Daishinkan'', literally ''named attack'' that ZKKfans likes to use in their argument. And it had no Haki in it despite Zolo being a Haki user there.
Its basically proven that Haki isn't included in WGS title.
Yes he has over Oden but not over Roger, thats why he got that title after Roger died;
''strength''
you got debunked.
Lets see you cry here as well;
https://worstgen.alwaysdata.net/forum/threads/wb-vs-oden-vs-mihawk.66725/
Lets see you argue WB > Mihawk but not WB > Oden
Same reason why non-DF Rayleigh showing Luffy DF skills, or non-swordsman learning Haki, its because to make him more powerful overall as a fighter and protect his weapon just like other fighters protect their weapons by using Haki. Literally Mihawk tells Zolo, he needs to learn Haki because he needs to protect his sword from damages, basically same logic as why every other fighter need to learn Haki to protect themselves.
Alber can be swordsman and then not be swordsman, its up to him. There is no rule like that you are either swordsman or not lmao, swordsmanship is not a type of distinction like human or not human. Swordsmanship is just 1 of the many other fighting styles, marksman, martial artist, DF user, swordsmanship etc etc.
Haki user Zolo used ''NAMED ATTACK'' without Haki, thats swordsmanship, which Haki is not included.
Haki isn't included in a named sword attack. WGS title doesn't include Haki.
This is what WGS and Swordsmanship is about, since you ZKKfans like ''NAMED ATTACK'' argument, this debunked you
Zolo used ''Daishinkan'', literally ''named attack'' that ZKKfans likes to use in their argument. And it had no Haki in it despite Zolo being a Haki user there.
Its basically proven that Haki isn't included in WGS title.
King is a swordsman.
His vc confirms it
He's welcome to do more than swordsmanship
Like cabaji like Law like fujitora
He's still a swordsman who loves sword duels.
It's a named attack that did no damage to Monet.
Your logic weakest attack does no damage strongest attack uses haki does most damage.
Told you, non-DF Rayleigh taught Luffy DF skill, that doesn't mean Rayleigh uses DF now. Mihawk's reason to show Zolo Haki was to protect his sword just like other fighters protect themselves by using Haki, same logic. Not ryou.
Zolo was asking Koshiro how to cut steel, Koshiro gave him idea about Haki. He didn't randomly show him that, Zolo asked for it. Cutting steel isn't special to swordsman, someone who wants to destroy steel with axe or spear also need to learn Haki to cut steel.
Not doing damage to Monet is irrelevant LMAO, what is this argument. Who cares does damage or not, point is Haki user Zolo used name attack without Haki proves that swordsmanship isn't Haki, its a fighting style like martial art where Aokiji and Garp don't use Haki while training. Haki training is different.
Its fun to watch how Lik and ZKKfans cries.
Zolo was asking Koshiro how to cut steel, Koshiro gave him idea about Haki. He didn't randomly show him that, Zolo asked for it. Cutting steel isn't special to swordsman, someone who wants to destroy steel with axe or spear also need to learn Haki to cut steel.
Not doing damage to Monet is irrelevant LMAO, what is this argument. Who cares does damage or not, point is Haki user Zolo used name attack without Haki proves that swordsmanship isn't Haki, its a fighting style like martial art where Aokiji and Garp don't use Haki while training. Haki training is different.
Its fun to watch how Lik and ZKKfans cries.
Yes he has over Oden but not over Roger, thats why he got that title after Roger died;
''strength''
you got debunked.
''strength''
you got debunked.
We are back to you failing to prove WB>primeOden.
So it was all just your headcanon and nothing more? Pathetic...
Lets see you cry here as well;
https://worstgen.alwaysdata.net/forum/threads/wb-vs-oden-vs-mihawk.66725/
Lets see you argue WB > Mihawk but not WB > Oden
https://worstgen.alwaysdata.net/forum/threads/wb-vs-oden-vs-mihawk.66725/
Lets see you argue WB > Mihawk but not WB > Oden
No, that is not a time of prime Oden.
We are back to you failing to prove WB>primeOden.
So it was all just your headcanon and nothing more? Pathetic...
How many cope threads do you need to create just because you cannot prove WB>primeOden?
We are back to you failing to prove WB>primeOden.
So it was all just your headcanon and nothing more? Pathetic...
How many cope threads do you need to create just because you cannot prove WB>primeOden?
Why would Oden gets stronger more by fighting weaker opponents like Rayleigh or Gaban, but WB doesn't get stronger when he fights stronger opponent Roger? There are levels.So lets see you argue WB > Mihawk but not WB > Oden, your L is waiting.
Oden can be prime or not, he is still always weaker than WB. The difference never changes between them Lik of 1000 Ls, just like Luffy and Zolo doesn't change
Mihawk>WB
Oden>WB
Cry about it.
And the source of this is your headcanon. Is that how you debunk people? Once again, do you know what debunk means?
Mihawk>WB
Oden>WB
Cry about it.
Mihawk>WB
Oden>WB
Cry about it.
Why would WB > Oden difference would change when WB fights stronger opponents such as Roger, and Oden fights weaker opponents like Ray or Gaban yet Oden gets stronger more for no reason?
You have no proof for why WB > Oden difference would change.
You are also desperate about WB > Mihawk, another L.
Its a general captain > underling rule Lik of 1000 Ls.
Why would WB > Oden difference would change when WB fights stronger opponents such as Roger, and Oden fights weaker opponents like Ray or Gaban?
You have no proof for why WB > Oden difference would change.
You are also desperate about WB > Mihawk, another L.
Why would WB > Oden difference would change when WB fights stronger opponents such as Roger, and Oden fights weaker opponents like Ray or Gaban?
You have no proof for why WB > Oden difference would change.
You are also desperate about WB > Mihawk, another L.
How long will you cry just because you cannot prove WB>primeOden?