Luffy 1010's CoC was literally said to be crude and clumsy.
Who do you want to believe that the legendary Gaban, third of Roger's pirates, compared to Roger and Ray, a living legend feared even by CDs, who fought for decades against anyone and at any level, Rocks, BB, Garp, Marines and so on, had a crude and clumsy haki?
Who do you want to believe that the legendary Gaban, third of Roger's pirates, compared to Roger and Ray, a living legend feared even by CDs, who fought for decades against anyone and at any level, Rocks, BB, Garp, Marines and so on, had a crude and clumsy haki?
I said long ago that if Gaban has ACoC he's undeniably a top-tier.
However, where he ranks within that top-tier is dependent on feats. My point is that simply having FS + ACoC is not enough to for us to be able to accurately place him. We need feats from him, as a character exists who has those exact same abilities and more (even had internal destruction CoA) and still wasn't even top-tier.
Yamato's ACoC wasn't stated to be crude nor clumsy, but it's still not even enough to place her in the top-tier. Whereas sky-splitter Luffy was top-tier even without G4 because his ACoC became that strong.