General Chat

[RyoQ]

 

[Reborn]

Yeah I see him in every channel and it is annoying as fuark.



Don't ever call yourself Catholic again, you siding with porn and hentai advocates.

Post automatically merged: Saturday at 2:53 AM

You're the one comparing my pfp to anime tiddies

Will you raise objections in the same manner if someones wear a man's avy with chest wide open?

I bet you won't because that's fine to you.

However, a women's suggestive avy is an issue because?

 

[NAMELESS]

Catholic men and women in Brazil wear bikinis and swim trunks all the time... Nobody feels scandalized...Eroticism is in the eye of the beholder after all...

 

[RyoQ]

Will you raise objections in the same manner if someones wear a man's avy with chest wide open?

No

I bet you won't because that's fine to you.

It's not as sexual no. The male body is biologically less sexual than the female one, this is why it is socially acceptable in generally all societies for men to not wear shirts

Male shirtless pfps can be lewd but that depends on the image I guess, some Ryokugyu pfps I would not choose because some of the ones girls draw on X are quite, erm. Lol

Post automatically merged: Saturday at 3:03 AM

Catholic men and women in Brazil wear bikinis and swim trunks all the time... Nobody feels scandalized...Eroticism is in the eye of the beholder after all...

More relativist slop

Swim trunks are fine, bikinis is lingerie and is condemned

Also LOL for thinking most """Catholic""" men and women actually follow the catechism and practice their faith

 

[NAMELESS]

Seriously what do you do if you see women in bikinis on the beach

LOL What do you think? He says nothing.

 

[Reborn]

No



It's not as sexual no. The male body is biologically less sexual than the female one, this is why it is socially acceptable in generally all societies (no, a tribe in the middle of the amazon that has no written language doesn't count) for men to not wear shirts

Male pfps can be lewd but that depends on the image I guess, some Ryokugyu pfps I would not choose because some of the ones girls draw on X are quite, erm. Lol

Then rather than questioning others you need to question your own mindset because perception of things is the reflection of one's own mindset

True morality applies equally.

 

[NAMELESS]

Will you raise objections in the same manner if someones wear a man's avy with chest wide open?

I bet you won't because that's fine to you.

However, a women's suggestive avy is an issue because?

Because he is straight. He doesn't get bothered by males' chests. He is angry because Nami makes him blush.

 

[Monster Zoro's Tesla Supplier]

No



It's not as sexual no. The male body is biologically less sexual than the female one, this is why it is socially acceptable in generally all societies (no, a tribe in the middle of the amazon that has no written language doesn't count) for men to not wear shirts

Male pfps can be lewd but that depends on the image I guess, some Ryokugyu pfps I would not choose because some of the ones girls draw on X are quite, erm. Lol

Post automatically merged: Saturday at 3:03 AM

More relativist slop

Swim trunks are fine, bikinis is lingerie and is condemned

Boobs aren't inherently sexual lmfao that's a purely social construct. There's a reason why parts of Africa let their women go around with their titties hanging out and even if some of those women have huge titties they don't care because they don't see it as sexual.

 

[RyoQ]

Then rather than questioning others you need to question your own mindset because perception of things is the reflection of one's own mindset

It isn't perception, it is teleological. The female body is objectively more alluring to men than the male is to females because of biology. It is more hormonal and naturally ordered towards being acted towards, or upon, by men, not the other way around.

So no, female and male suggestive pfps are not held to the same standard because they are different not the same.

Post automatically merged: Saturday at 3:08 AM

Boobs aren't inherently sexual lmfao that's a purely social construct. There's a reason why parts of Africa let their women go around with their titties hanging out and even if some of those women have huge titties they don't care because they don't see it as sexual.

What is considered "modest" is a social construct

What is "sexual" within humans is biological, it is based on dimorphism within humans. Feet for example are a lightly or not very dimorphic trait, that is to say they are not influenced much by hormones and don't indicate sex, breasts are an extremely dimorphic trait because they are highly influences by hormones and indicative of sex.

 

[NAMELESS]

"Bikini=Lingerie"
"Male body biologically less attractive"

 

[RyoQ]

"Male biologically less attractive"

The male body is less sexual, this is scientific

 

[NAMELESS]

I avoid walking around in the streets without my shirt because I get the looks from girls. Ugly guys will never understand this.

 

[RyoQ]

"Bikini=Lingerie"

Women who wear bikinis are guilty of mortal sin

 

[NAMELESS]

Gym bro science says lifting weights makes panties drop. Just saying.

 

[Reborn]

It isn't perception, it is teleological. The female body is objectively more alluring to men than the male is to females because of biology. It is more hormonal and naturally ordered towards being acted towards, or upon, by men, not the other way around.

So no, female and male suggestive pfps are not held to the same standard because they are different not the same.

Post automatically merged: Saturday at 3:08 AM

What is considered "modest" is a social construct

What is "sexual" within humans is biological, it is based on dimorphism within humans. Feet for example are a lightly or not very dimorphic trait, that is to say they are not influenced much by hormones and don't indicate sex, breasts are an extremely dimorphic trait because they are highly influences by hormones and indicative of sex.

Now you are making up shit to justify your double standards of applying morality and modesty.


I am a woman and I find your avy very suggestive... revealing chest...

Others women perhaps feel the same but respect your freedom of expression.

But I don't. Change it and if you can't then you have no right to tell others what avy they should wear even if it's causing you discomfort as long as that avy stays within forum limits.

 

[AL sama]

fanservice for female gaze

fanservice for male gaze

fanservice nonetheless

 

[NAMELESS]

Now you are making up shit to justify your double standards of applying morality and modesty.


I am a woman and I find your avy very suggestive... revealing chest...

Others women perhaps feel the same but respect your freedom of expression.

But I don't. Change it and if you can't then you have no right to tell others what avy they should wear even if it's causing you discomfort as long as that avy stays within forum limits.

Lust is in the eye of the beholder. Guy claims to be Christian but doesn't understand such a basic concept. His takes are just hypocrisy. They reveal the contents of his lustful mind too. I can even tolerate pg13s avis without feeling anything sexual because drawings aren't really what turn me on. It's all in the mind.

 

[RyoQ]

Now you are making up shit to justify your double standards of applying morality and modesty.

It's not a double standard lol

-Men are more visually stimulated (especially in terms of sexual arousal) than women, can drop studies for this, there are plenty

-From an evolutionary psychology perspective, men are more responsive to visual cues related to fertility (e.g., youth, body shape) than women are with men. Again studies have been done on this that I can provide, men evolved to prioritize physical cues of fertility more than women which again explains why they are more visually stimulated

 

[NAMELESS]

oh my god...

Post automatically merged: Saturday at 3:48 AM

fanservice for female gaze

fanservice for male gaze

fanservice nonetheless

Ace 2 sexy plz delete

 

[RyoQ]

fanservice for female gaze

fanservice for male gaze

fanservice nonetheless

The latter is more much more stimulating to men than the former is for women, this is a bullshit equivalence men and women are not the same
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15004563/
"the amygdala and hypothalamus are more strongly activated in men than in women when viewing identical sexual stimuli. This was true even when women reported greater arousal."

Even the most aroused of women were not more stimulated than the average man when seeing erotic material of the opposite sex


Female fanservice is not equal to male fanservice, the latter is more egregious and erotic. This is biology people