General Chat

[NAMELESS]

I am glad you have stated it's within the rules, now no more concern trolling about me wasting my time since "the mods break the rules" and "they won't listen bro!" Apparently, they don't have to since it's within the rules!




I don't read One Shit and haven't for years. Like many here, I only keep up with via spoilers and am a powerscaler who does not give a wet dogshit about the story except my favs.

Even if I did read One Piece, that wouldn't be hypocritical as long as I avoid looking at the fanservice and am morally opposed to it. You need to google the definition of hypocrisy

lol someone is triggered. Sure. I will pretend to believe in your story, pervert. Just remember to stay away from beaches or public swimming pools. You might have a meltdown if you don't, snowflake. even if i did read...LMFAO, no need to be ashamed to admitting to reading a manga filled with fanservice bozo hahaha

Post automatically merged: Sep 6, 2025

.... -_-
Smh.
People have to stop being so sensitive about these things.

Post automatically merged: Sep 6, 2025

Your bitching about fanservice?
Your one of those people?
Smh.

Bitching about fan service pfp in a forum about a manga filled with those. It's like complaining about nudity in a porn site lmfao

 

[RyoQ]

even if i did read...LMFAO, no need to be ashamed to admitting to reading a manga filled with fanservice bozo hahaha

"You can't be anti porn and watch an anime with fanservice"

Why is this true, so long as said person skips the fanservice?

Rest of your message is an ad hominen so I won't respond. All I can say is it is saddening a fellow Catholic is called a pervert for condemning hentai

 

[NAMELESS]

Even if I did, saying "you can't be against FANSERVICE but watch anime with fanservice" is wrong since someone can just avoid looking at the fanservice.

Let me rephrase that for you: "You can't be against sexually provocative images while watching content filled with those, because one can just avoid looking at such images in a manga filled with them." Bro, the mental gymnastics.... Just admit you are being hypocritical here.

What did Jesus about this:
And if your eye causes you to stumble, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to enter life with one eye than to have two eyes and be thrown into the fire of hell.
https://biblehub.com/matthew/18-9.htm

If Nami in a bikini or Tashigi's tits make you that triggered, just be a good christian and gtfo of this place and don't read manga. Don't go to the beach or public swimming pools either, because you can't handle some girls showing some skin without having a nosebleed, apparently.

Post automatically merged: Sep 6, 2025

"You can't be anti porn and watch an anime with fanservice"

Why is this true, so long as said person skips the fanservice?

Rest of your message is an ad hominen so I won't respond. All I can say is it is saddening a fellow Catholic is called a pervert for condemning hentai

Hentai=porn. I haven't seen anything explicit here yet. You are just being a puritan at this point.

 

[RyoQ]

Let me rephrase that for you: "You can't be against sexually provocative images while watching content filled with those, because one can just avoid looking at such images in a manga filled with them." Bro, the mental gymnastics.... Just admit you are being hypocritical here.

Is someone who is against porn obliged to avoid all media with fanservice?

Can someone be against porn and watch any form of media except kid shows then?

Obviously not true, just skip the bad content lmfao. I've done it with plenty of anime and some of my favorite tv shows. I also had no problem doing so when I was still a weekly reader, it is easy

If Nami in a bikini or Tashigi's tits make you that triggered, just be a good christian and gtfo of this place and don't read manga. Don't go to the beach or public swimming pools either, because you can't handle some girls showing some skin without having a nosebleed, apparently.

I truly hate people that use such logic, it is even more appalling coming from a Catholic.

It is truly a disgusting thing, seeing examples in real life where the moral standard has been lost, and using this to push this standard further into obscurity because it is no longer contemporarily upheld.

Post automatically merged: Sep 6, 2025

Hentai=porn. I haven't seen anything explicit here yet. You are just being a puritan at this point.

I never called his pfp hentai. But defending softcore (which is what it is, as Gaimon said), makes hentai more normalized, so in that sense you are defending it

 

[NAMELESS]

Is someone who is against porn obliged to avoid all media with fanservice?

Can someone be against porn and watch any form of media except kid shows then?

Obviously not true, just skip the bad content lmfao. I've done it with plenty of anime and some of my favorite tv shows. I also had no problem doing so when I was still a weekly reader, it is easy



I truly hate people that use such logic, it is even more appalling coming from a Catholic.

It is truly a disgusting thing, seeing examples in real life where the moral standard has been lost, and using this to push this standard further into obscurity because it is no longer contemporarily upheld.

Post automatically merged: Sep 6, 2025

I never called his pfp hentai. But defending softcore (which is what it is, as Gaimon said), makes hentai more normalized, so in that sense you are defending it

There is no porn on this site. You are being an ass. That is what you are doing. We literally have a panel of Robin grabbing Franky by the balls in this show, and it's still not porn. There is no user currently using any echii pfp that goes beyond the limits of the echii contained in One Piece. Don't try to gaslight and shame people because you are ashamed to admit you read stuff with mild ecchi content. Again, I did not say what one should or should not use as a pfp, so drop the "you are defending blah blah" argument. You are throwing a tantrum for no reason. There is no porn in One Piece, and no user is using anything that isn't in the scope of the manga. Btw, if you are really concerned about NSFW content in this forum, you should voice your thoughts in the proper section. This is a politics thread.

 

[RyoQ]

There is no porn on this site. You are being an ass. That is what you are doing. We literally have a panel of Robin grabbing Franky by the balls in this show, and it's still not porn. There is no user currently using any echii pfp that goes beyond the limits of the echii contained in One Piece. Don't try to gaslight and shame people because you are ashamed to admit you read stuff with mild ecchi content. Again, I did not say what one should or should not use as a pfp, so drop the "you are defending blah blah" argument. You are throwing a tantrum for no reason. There is no porn in One Piece, and no user is using anything that isn't in the scope of the manga. Btw, if you are really concerned about NSFW content in this forum, you should voice your thoughts in the proper section. This is a politics thread.

I agree, there's no porn on this site

Any merely erotic/suggestive, sexual pfp is against the rules. Erotic content is not allowed. Yes this would include many OP panels.
https://worstgen.alwaysdata.net/forum/threads/worstgen-forum-rules.1/

Again, I did not say what one should or should not use as a pfp

You think he should be able to use this pfp. Don't start acting like you have no opinion on this topic, you are fine with gooner pfps and probably hentai in general. Christians on Worstgen who are actually against this stuff call it out, you do not

 

[NAMELESS]

I agree, there's no porn on this site

Any merely erotic/suggestive, sexual pfp is against the rules. Erotic content is not allowed. Yes this would include many OP panels.
https://worstgen.alwaysdata.net/forum/threads/worstgen-forum-rules.1/



You think he should be able to use this pfp. Don't start acting like you have no opinion on this topic, you are fine with gooner pfps and probably hentai in general. Christians on Worstgen who are actually against this stuff call it out, you do not

You are simply ignorant about the meaning of these terms:
|Erotic Content|
Erotic post content is not allowed on the forum:

• Depiction of nudes, genitals, breasts, or sexual acts is forbidden--->Fully exposed genitals are no no. Bikinis and such are fine.
• Sharing sexual content, websites, or writing graphic pornographic content is also not allowed--->self explanatory.
• Suggestive sexual images are not allowed either---> "Suggestive sexual images", aka images depicting sexual acts. Jew posted one such image and got his post deleted (suggesting a blowjob). "Erotic" means stuff that triggers sexual desire. Which for most adults means EXPLICIT SEXUAL CONTENT. If you are triggered by anime chicks in bikinis, you need to mature.

@AL sama I think these past few posts were off-topic; can you delete the whole thing, plz?

Post automatically merged: Sep 6, 2025

I agree, there's no porn on this site

Any merely erotic/suggestive, sexual pfp is against the rules. Erotic content is not allowed. Yes this would include many OP panels.
https://worstgen.alwaysdata.net/forum/threads/worstgen-forum-rules.1/



You think he should be able to use this pfp. Don't start acting like you have no opinion on this topic, you are fine with gooner pfps and probably hentai in general. Christians on Worstgen who are actually against this stuff call it out, you do not

Again, you shouldn't even be reading OP if you are that puritan. Tashigi and many other female characters are depicted just the way Herrera pfps show. No user is going beyond the scope of the manga. Your whole tantrum was about forum rules being broken. I just explained why they weren't. What I think people should or should not do doesn't matter. This is no place for preaching. Grow the fuck up.

 

[RyoQ]

• Suggestive sexual images are not allowed either---> "Suggestive sexual images", aka images depicting sexual acts. Jew posted one such image and got his post deleted (suggesting a blowjob). "Erotic" means stuff that triggers sexual desire. Which for most adults means EXPLICIT SEXUAL CONTENT. If you are triggered by anime chicks in bikinis, you need to mature.

No, this is a matter of the rules needing to be redefined.

"Suggestive" means suggestive, not explicit. If it means EXPLICIT, then it must be redefined to say EXPLICIT, not SUGGESTIVE.

Post automatically merged: Sep 6, 2025

If you are triggered by anime chicks in bikinis, you need to mature.

Just say you're morally OK with hentai, ok "Catholic"?

 

[NAMELESS]

No, this is a matter of the rules needing to be redefined.

"Suggestive" means suggestive, not explicit. If it means EXPLICIT, then it must be redefined to say EXPLICIT, not SUGGESTIVE.

Post automatically merged: Sep 6, 2025

Just say you're morally OK with hentai, ok "Catholic"?

No penis, vagina or nipples. The rules boil down to this. It isn't any of my business what people watch. It ain't yours either. You are just a prick. I bet you are the kind of guy that watches porn and shames others to hide your shame.

Post automatically merged: Sep 6, 2025

Sexual suggestiveness is visual, verbal, written or behavioral material or action with sexual undertones implying sexual intent in order to provoke sexual arousal.[1][2][3][4]
There are variations in the perception and display of sexual suggestiveness, including but not limited to gender, culture and generation. Different cultures and different generations have varying views on what is considered to be sexually suggestive. For example, in British culture, it is normal for a woman to wear shorts and bare her legs on a hot, sunny day, but a woman with naked flesh exposed would be considered promiscuous in certain cultures around the world. In evolutionary terms, sexual suggestiveness is a mode from which sexual mates are gained. Therefore, the ability to use sexual suggestiveness effectively is a trait that is part of sexual selection.
Displays of sexual suggestiveness include things such as; women in swimsuit adverts, sexually themed music or music with a strong beat meant for dancing, sexting, erotic lingerie or "wolf whistling".[5][6][7][8][9] Sexual suggestiveness may also involve nudity, or the exposure of the nipples, genitals, buttocks or other taboo areas of the body.[10][11] Even a brand name or phrase can be considered to be sexually suggestive if it has strong sexual connotations or undertones.[12]
In some cases, displays of sexual suggestiveness may be misinterpreted which may lead to dangerous or harmful situations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_suggestiveness

@RyoQ Educate yourself. This is a relative term. It has been agreed by mods that stuff that is in the manga is fine.

 

[RyoQ]

No penis, vagina or nipples. The rules boil down to this

The rule just says suggestive. What you are describing is "explicit".

Post automatically merged: Sep 6, 2025

It isn't any of my business what people watch. It ain't yours either. You are just a prick. I bet you are the kind of guy that watches porn and shames others to hide your shame.

"I'm not defending hentai/porn"

5 mins later

"It's none of my business"


Catholic doctrine is that the state has a moral obligation to ban it.
CCC 2354

“Pornography consists in removing real or simulated sexual acts from the intimacy of the partners, in order to display them deliberately to third parties. It offends against chastity because it perverts the conjugal act, the intimate giving of spouses to each other. It does grave injury to the dignity of its participants (actors, vendors, the public), since each one becomes an object of base pleasure and illicit profit for others. It immerses all who are involved in the illusion of a fantasy world. It is a grave offense. Civil authorities should prevent the production and distribution of pornographic materials.”​

So much for "not my business", Church teaching is that it is intrinsically and gravely wrong and that civil authorities have a duty to prevent it's distribution and production

To hell with your laxity

 

[NAMELESS]

The rule just says suggestive. What you are describing is "explicit".

Wrong. A woman in shorts might be considered appropriate in some cultures depending on the context, while in others it might not. "Suggestive" is a relative term. In this forum, understand "suggestive" as a fully exposed penis, vagina, anus, nipples and buttocks. You are just going by YOUR definition of suggestive. Most manga material is legal here. Non-autistic people understand this without the need for long and detailed explanations.

 

[RyoQ]

Wrong. A woman in shorts might be considered appropriate in some cultures depending on the context, while in others it might not. "Suggestive" is a relative term. In this forum, understand "suggestive" as a fully exposed penis, vagina, anus, nipples and buttocks. You are just going by YOUR definition of suggestive. Most manga material is legal here. Non-autistic people understand this without the need for long and detailed explanations.

Huge boobs aren't suggestive

Post automatically merged: Sep 6, 2025

Dayum, Brazillian Catholics are this cooked

We dodged a bullet not getting another Pope from that part of the world

 

[NAMELESS]

Huge boobs aren't suggestive

Post automatically merged: Sep 6, 2025

Dayum, Brazillian Catholics are this cooked

We dodged a bullet not getting another Pope from that part of the world

Old mothers' saggy tits are suggestive then?

 

[RyoQ]

Old mothers' saggy tits are suggestive then?

They're saggy, not huge so no

 

[NAMELESS]

Huge boobs aren't suggestive

Read.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_suggestiveness

The rule just says suggestive. What you are describing is "explicit".

Post automatically merged: Sep 6, 2025

"I'm not defending hentai/porn"

5 mins later

"It's none of my business"


Catholic doctrine is that the state has a moral obligation to ban it.
CCC 2354

“Pornography consists in removing real or simulated sexual acts from the intimacy of the partners, in order to display them deliberately to third parties. It offends against chastity because it perverts the conjugal act, the intimate giving of spouses to each other. It does grave injury to the dignity of its participants (actors, vendors, the public), since each one becomes an object of base pleasure and illicit profit for others. It immerses all who are involved in the illusion of a fantasy world. It is a grave offense. Civil authorities should prevent the production and distribution of pornographic materials.”

So much for "not my business", Church teaching is that it is intrinsically and gravely wrong and that civil authorities have a duty to prevent it's distribution and production

To hell with your laxity

First, this isn't a Catholic forum, moron. Second, I literally reported an image with a sexual act in this thread. Third, there is no pornography in OP or in this forum. Fourth, I said I'm not good at being religious. I have watched porn. I have masturbated. I have fucked. This is why I'm not scandalized by anime chicks in bikinis. The problem is that you have a perverted mind that is sensible to these silly things, and in an attempt to hide your shame, you try to patronize others. If you really are a Christian, you shouldn't be judging others, especially when you are being hypocritical.

Post automatically merged: Sep 6, 2025

They're saggy, not huge so no

Voluptuous women make you uneasy, bro.?

Post automatically merged: Sep 6, 2025

Don't bother replying. I'm done talking to man-children. Debate c4n if you want a battle of definitions.

 

[RyoQ]

First, this isn't a Catholic forum, moron. Second, I literally reported an image with a sexual act in this thread. Third, there is no pornography in OP or in this forum. Fourth, I said I'm not good at being religious. I have watched porn. I have masturbated. I have fucked. This is why I'm not scandalized by anime chicks in bikinis. The problem is that you have a perverted mind that is sensible to these silly things, and in an attempt to hide your shame, you try to patronize others. If you really are a Christian, you shouldn't be judging others, especially when you are being hypocritical.

You claim to be Catholic, I am merely holding you to this because this is what the Church teaches, if you disagree you aren't Catholic

Read.

I don't need to a fucking wikipedia article to recognize old saggy tits are not sexually suggestive the way large, full ones are. That is basic logic. Lol

to hide your shame, you try to patronize others.

"If you have a problem with X, you are guilty of X"
Oh, if only we took this logic everywhere at all times.

Post automatically merged: Sep 6, 2025

Fourth, I said I'm not good at being religious. I have watched porn. I have masturbated. I have fucked. This is why I'm not scandalized by anime chicks in bikinis

Even if someone has used porn in the past, even recent past, they should still be morally against it because it is pure evil, this does not make them a hypocrite it just means they must pick up their cross and continue striving against this vice.

One of the worst things to be unleashed on this world and Christians are called to oppose it in this life regardless of what people may think

 

[Monster Zoro's Tesla Supplier]

Huge boobs aren't suggestive

Post automatically merged: Sep 6, 2025

Dayum, Brazillian Catholics are this cooked

We dodged a bullet not getting another Pope from that part of the world

True boobs are clearly always suggestive. They have no purpose beyond being sexual.
Wish they could, I dunno, feed babies or something.

 

[Ravagerblade]

Bro, Get the fuck off the high horse. Just as much as I have a problem with the left trying to censorship now, you trying to censor shit isn't helping either. Best move for you to do is not engage, Don't you dare try to tear down other people who enjoy a bit of fanservice.
You trying to preach the high road but you are not any better as I see it.

 

[RyoQ]

True boobs are clearly always suggestive. They have no purpose beyond being sexual.
Wish they could, I dunno, feed babies or something.

Well, if you're argument is that a girl with large boobs showing isn't suggestive, this is a pretty bad one

If a girl posted her huge breasts on Instagram or something obviously that is a thirst trap post and we would call it that.

"Feed babies" yes dude, all sexual traits a woman has, are rooted in some biological end of hers. Does this mean it's not a sexual trait anymore?

 

[NAMELESS]

Bro, Get the fuck off the high horse. Just as much as I have a problem with the left trying to censorship now, you trying to censor shit isn't helping either. Best move for you to do is not engage, Don't you dare try to tear down other people who enjoy a bit of fanservice.
You trying to preach the high road but you are not any better as I see it.

Imagine belittling others for consuming stuff he himself indulges in. One thing this forum taught me is that hypocrites are low in self-awareness.