i somewhat agree, BUT i think its weird for you to dehumanize him considering you criticize dehumanization elsewhere. him being radical doesnt make him any less human.
Post automatically merged:


what about jizzing on peoples faces?!?!?! please dont tell me that is evil as well
Post automatically merged:


because trump and kirk are against transgenderism but not gays, lesbians and bisexual people.
Post automatically merged:


:steef:
Just giving him a taste of his own medicine…he’s over here comparing gays to animals or whatever, I think you give up your right to be treated with respect or decency when you show none to begin with :kayneshrug:
 
thats why i mentioned "women" in my post. . .
Doesn't change anything. The foreplay had between the men doesn't culminate in anything because neither of the men are becoming pregnant

if it's them going and impregnating a woman, that is just them fapping some men and then going and having sex with women. The former is unnatural even if the latter action is natural
Post automatically merged:

i mean i cant help you if you dont understand what legality means.
:rolaugh:
if gay marriage is legal by the state, that means the state considers it good

if the inverse was true (it was considered bad), the state would forbid it
 
Just giving him a taste of his own medicine…he’s over here comparing gays to animals or whatever, I think you give up your right to be treated with respect or decency when you show none to begin with :kayneshrug:
i was the one making comparisons to animals though. not to gays but humans in general, to adress the "natural" argument.

you dont need to treat him with respect, but he is still human lol.

Doesn't change anything. The foreplay had between the men doesn't culminate in anything because neither of the men are becoming pregnant
so the women have to be part of the foreplay as well, like tickling the nipples of the men, and since that is their very own reproductive ritual resulting in 2 men each impregnating a woman, them fucking each other in the ass was perfectly fine all along.

#nohomo
 
i was the one making comparisons to animals though. not to gays but humans in general, to adress the "natural" argument.

you dont need to treat him with respect, but he is still human lol.
I don’t disagree with the notion of us being animals in general, but I didn’t realize that was you. Either way, he’s definitely equating homosexuality with incest; that’s unforgivable in my eyes and is needlessly spreading lies about an entire community, so he can suck my fat Jewish cock and balls about it :sanmoji:
 
this is so incredibly naive, close-minded and generalizing it boggles my mind.
No, it's logically sound. If something is legal it is protected by the state
Post automatically merged:

. Either way, he’s definitely equating homosexuality with incest; that’s unforgivable in my eyes and is needlessly spreading lies about an entire community, so he can suck my fat Jewish cock and balls about it :sanmoji:
True, they're both unnatural and historically have been treated the same. Both unnatural abberations and abuses of the sexual faculties in different ways.
:jay-he:
 
Hard drugs are illegal because the state considers them bad

Smoking and drinking are legal because in moderation they are considered "good"
yeah no, look over to portugal with their decriminalization of drugs, they arent telling people drugs are good, they are telling their people that they will help them get sober instead of locking them up if they decide to use drugs.
 
yeah no, look over to portugal with their decriminalization of drugs, they arent telling people drugs are good, they are telling their people that they will help them get sober instead of locking them up if they decide to use drugs.
Anyways I don't think it really even matters for the sake of my argument

If something is legal, because people derive their morality to a large extent from the law, people will (and do) consider gay marriage as a good thing because the state endorses it by making it legal
 
Anyways I don't think it really even matters for the sake of my argument

If something is legal, because people derive their morality to a large extent from the law, people will (and do) consider gay marriage as a good thing because the state endorses it by making it legal
yeah but non-gay people dont get themselves gay marriages because it is legal wtf?


but i guess i open another can of worms. gay parents adopting kids :chopoff:
 
yeah but non-gay people dont get themselves gay marriages because it is legal wtf?
Wtf does this mean? Lol
Post automatically merged:

weird, because some countries ban ads for cigarettes and/or alcohol, so they dont want them to be portrayed as good to the population, but the shits still legal....

like bro are you for real with this nonsense?
It doesn't really matter whether the state considers it as "good", the effect it has is that the people consider it good, certainly worth being protected by the law

and because homosexuality is a form of extreme perversion, this means the state legalizing it will lead to the people supporting a form of perversion as good when it is not
 
The state will persecute you if you go against it, meaning in America it is not legal to deny marriage to same sex couples and the state will come after you. Obviously it being legal entails the state considering it as "good" in the sense that it is worth protecting
this sounds like its coming out of your ass. "denying marriage to same sex couples" would only ever apply to government officials then? it doesnt have anything to do with you. laws preventing you from discriminating people based on their sexual orientation are separate to the topic we are talking about.
 
Top