You can't just have your conclusion and then try to pick the evidence to support it. You are supposed to gather the evidence and then come to a conclusion. What you're doing is the opposite of logic and reasoning. It's also kind of antithetical to any objective standard ever. You're just like, "Hey, these are my criteria," and this cherry picked and context devoid metrics are what I've deemed as not passing my criteria.
The term "relative" made it perfectly clear I was talking about opponents he has to defeat with a PU, and it was said in the context of him getting a PU to finish off Pizarro in his giant rock form. If my intent was to make a general claim not based on evidences and without thinking about it, I wouldn't have been so specific in my wording. You're not making any sense.
To call something a strawman, you have to show how someone distorted your actual position. That never happened. You said Sanji’s AP is his relative weakness, and I and others pointed out that is just wrong because the evidence shows his AP consistently keeps pace with his opponents at every stage. That is a disagreement, not a distortion.
Him being able to hurt his opponents with his AP only addresses this imaginary claim, but not what I actually said. I noticed some people have this tendency to constantly post a ton of panels, even when they don't actually address what was said, and think it makes their posts automatically good. Well, it doesn't.
You can twist it and word it any way you like, this won't change the fact it's clearly a straw man.
You keep moving the goalposts. When otherw bring up feats showing Sanji’s AP working against high durability enemies such as Jabra and Oars, you wave them off as irrelevant. But you are the one who claimed AP was the area he needs to improve. Proving that wrong requires showing examples where his AP was already sufficient. That is literally the counter evidence you asked for.
Your initial reaction was to try intimidation tactics with your "let's get it" comment and saying I've got "the best Sanji defenders' attention", and you even went as far as ordering me to get out of the FC. It's very obvious what you are about. And now you're clumsily trying to take an intellectual approach with this far-fetched, contrived load of nonsense? Lol. You're not fooling anyone.
Sanji did not need Ifrit Jambe to beat Queen. It was overkill. He was dodging and countering everything before the exoskeleton confusion even started. The exoskeleton power up was an amplifier, not a fix for a deficiency. Pretending it covered up a weakness is just your own conclusion looking for evidence, not the other way around.
Your logic is completely backwards. You started with Sanji’s AP is his weakest stat, and now you are cherry picking moments that might fit that idea while ignoring full fight context and character progression. That is not reasoning. That is confirmation bias.
And if we are talking relative stats, Sanji’s AP, speed, and endurance are all proportionally higher than the vast majority of commanders. Saying speed is just his best one does not magically make AP a weak point. That is like saying Zoro’s defense is weak because his offense is insane. It is nonsense
I must know why start with Enies Lobby? Why focus on Sanji specifically when Chopper, Robin, Usopp, Zoro, and Luffy all got AP power ups this same arc?
The only time I did was when Hamlette brought up Luffy and Zoro, and I clearly said Luffy had a relative AP issue against Kaido that he needed to overcome to be able to defeat him, same with Zoro against King. Then Hamlette behaved like a normal human being who got my point but simply disagreed with the idea of Sanji's next PU against a BBP being AP-based, instead of strawmaning me, accusing me of moving the goalposts, calling me a fake Sanji fan or trying to pressure me into leaving the FC.
Like I said, you guys are suffering from Sanji bashing PTSD and it makes you paranoid, ignoring the fact I regularly argue with his haters (my post history speaks for itself). I've been posting in this FC since June (first as Max and later with my current account) and it's the first time this issue arises, it's bonkers. You'd be a better judge of character if it wasn't for your selective memory.
Last edited:






