Character Discussion Why CoC was focused before FB start?

#1
There are certain moments which are not that important and can be ignored as just gags or unimportant reveals. And in isolation the confirmation of Zoro having CoC might seem just like that.

But if we take into account the last few arcs there seems to be a trend where we get seemingly unbeatable opponents and then we get a way to defeat them.

Until Katakuri and BM (in post TS) there wasn't any such opponent which required some specific technique or condition to be defeated. Tbh the Kata situation does not fully qualify since FS itself was not a requirement to defeat Kata but it was a skill which was learned by Luffy. And for BM the portrait needed to be destroyed for her impenetrable Iron Balloon defense to be deactivated.

Then in Wano we had Kaidos invincibility which needed ID and Enma. We got a specific condition for Kings flame off too. However for both opponents the requirement turned out to be ACoC.

Then in EH we again get King Jrs and they seemed unbeatable but were neutralised with the bubble gun (anime showed Zoro beating two but lets stick to manga panels for now). In EH we also got introduced to the seeming immortality of the Gorosei and there seemed to be no answer and the final savior was JBs CoC blast which sent them back and allowed the escape.

Now in Elbaf we again have these immortal HKs, Gorosei and Imu who keep regening. There are two instnaces where the regen has been shown to be slowed down, Gaban vs Sommers and Rocks vs Garling. We get the problem even earlier and have the SHs Jinbe and Chopper trying to figure out how to beat this infinite regen. Then we have Gabans showing and him commenting on how CoC might be the solution. This is reinforced in the FB when Garling is taking longer to regen and then is shown defeated.

However in case of Imu/Saturn an extreme amount of CoC doesn't seem to be the solution since there was no indication of any sort of slow down.

So why was CoC focused on if isn't the solution. Why were both Zoro and Loki shown to have the power but not realise it or know its nature/name. Why Gaban told Luffy to focus on it? The FB is not finished yet and Imus goals in GV were not accomplished since at least BB survived.

To me it seems like another one of the seeming invincibility and specific conditions combo like BM and Kata and Kaido and King. There is a technique for the counter like against Kata and Kaido for the slow regen effect and there is a specific condition for the counter like BM and King for the Imu regen (the problems as they seemed at that point in time). I think the real body in the abyss needs to be targeted.

If we look at the situation I think it is easier to describe the Zoro confirmation as him learning a skill like he did against Mr.1 (haki) and recently against King (ACoC). But like Zoro said he needed to be able to use the haki skill whenever required even after beating Mr.1 but he didn't know what it really was and could not use it against future Logia opponents like Enel and the sword rusting guy. Here Zoro has ACoC the answer to the HKs/Gorosei but now has knowledge about the skill and can counter the HKs/Gorosei (Logia).

What do you guys think? @nik87 @Cruxroux @mly90 @Shimotsuki Fenaker @MonsterKaido @HA001 @Orojackson Refugee @grey matter @Monster Zoro's Tesla Supplier etc.
 
#3
It is possible no character on GV till now has highest level of coc or correct usage of it to stop regen and they learn it when facing domi reversi xebec. Otherwise its a retcon or imu is special and needs something besides acoc.
I think Imu has the specific condition requirement
There is more to the GV flashback since Sommers knew Gaban and Gaban knows the HK counter.
 
#4
It is possible no character on GV till now has highest level of coc or correct usage of it to stop regen and they learn it when facing domi reversi xebec. Otherwise its a retcon or imu is special and needs something besides acoc.
This basically… I feel at the very least Roger has to pop off . If kaidos words actually mean something, the world (imu) to heel then Roger should pop off… all the yonko need to be super impressed by him as it’s not xebec they all talk about it’s Roger
 
#5
The way I see it, there's going to be different entirely for Advanced Conqueror.

Like, CoA Coating => Ryou (Flow) => Internal Destruction
CoC Coating=> ?? => ??

- Remember how, Garp said, Roger can be a Monster when his crew is in danger, Same goes for shanks that even Gorosei don't even touch him.
- Garp was seen as a monster by Pirates.
- Zoro calls Mihawk more inhuman than a fuckin Robot.

Above mentioned people are Conqueror beasts. No DF, pure haki and Skill.

I'm just guessing it will have something to do with " Manifestation of your will ".

Like Zoro Ashura is still unexplained. How do you even justify something like that.

Gaban said to use it more " Consciously ".

I don't think so Gaban is thinking he beat kaidou without Conqueror Coating.

Even Loki said, he is able to figure out something the way Gaban puts it.

I'm putting my money this kind of Conqueror Haki, which interacts will the other person will itself. Damaging them permanently. Gorosei have Scars. They were damaged permanently no matter how you see it.
 

nik87

Kitetsu Wanker
#6
Kaido told us everything we needed to know - haki conquers everything.
Oda is intentionally making some people fail, even when they dont have to.
I think all conquerors on GV had the counter to Imu but they werent allowed to dehype Imu at that point.
That's saved for present day Elbaf, where Imu will get dehype which is logical after God Valley hype.
I think Zoro is a counter to Imu in more ways than one.
Demon in human form for a reason.
 
#7
Their attacks just weren’t strong enough to even hurt Imu. I think only extremely potent ACoC can actually damage him, similar to what we saw with the Holy Knights but on a much higher level. But you can’t truly defeat or kill him. You’d need the Ope Ope no Mi to reverse his immortality, which was already spelled out by Ivankov in chapter 1086.
 
#8
Their attacks just weren’t strong enough to even hurt Imu. I think only extremely potent ACoC can actually damage him, similar to what we saw with the Holy Knights but on a much higher level. But you can’t truly defeat or kill him. You’d need the Ope Ope no Mi to reverse his immortality, which was already spelled out by Ivankov in chapter 1086.
Law is dying before EoS?
:shocked:
 
#11
There are certain moments which are not that important and can be ignored as just gags or unimportant reveals. And in isolation the confirmation of Zoro having CoC might seem just like that.

But if we take into account the last few arcs there seems to be a trend where we get seemingly unbeatable opponents and then we get a way to defeat them.

Until Katakuri and BM (in post TS) there wasn't any such opponent which required some specific technique or condition to be defeated. Tbh the Kata situation does not fully qualify since FS itself was not a requirement to defeat Kata but it was a skill which was learned by Luffy. And for BM the portrait needed to be destroyed for her impenetrable Iron Balloon defense to be deactivated.

Then in Wano we had Kaidos invincibility which needed ID and Enma. We got a specific condition for Kings flame off too. However for both opponents the requirement turned out to be ACoC.

Then in EH we again get King Jrs and they seemed unbeatable but were neutralised with the bubble gun (anime showed Zoro beating two but lets stick to manga panels for now). In EH we also got introduced to the seeming immortality of the Gorosei and there seemed to be no answer and the final savior was JBs CoC blast which sent them back and allowed the escape.

Now in Elbaf we again have these immortal HKs, Gorosei and Imu who keep regening. There are two instnaces where the regen has been shown to be slowed down, Gaban vs Sommers and Rocks vs Garling. We get the problem even earlier and have the SHs Jinbe and Chopper trying to figure out how to beat this infinite regen. Then we have Gabans showing and him commenting on how CoC might be the solution. This is reinforced in the FB when Garling is taking longer to regen and then is shown defeated.

However in case of Imu/Saturn an extreme amount of CoC doesn't seem to be the solution since there was no indication of any sort of slow down.

So why was CoC focused on if isn't the solution. Why were both Zoro and Loki shown to have the power but not realise it or know its nature/name. Why Gaban told Luffy to focus on it? The FB is not finished yet and Imus goals in GV were not accomplished since at least BB survived.

To me it seems like another one of the seeming invincibility and specific conditions combo like BM and Kata and Kaido and King. There is a technique for the counter like against Kata and Kaido for the slow regen effect and there is a specific condition for the counter like BM and King for the Imu regen (the problems as they seemed at that point in time). I think the real body in the abyss needs to be targeted.

If we look at the situation I think it is easier to describe the Zoro confirmation as him learning a skill like he did against Mr.1 (haki) and recently against King (ACoC). But like Zoro said he needed to be able to use the haki skill whenever required even after beating Mr.1 but he didn't know what it really was and could not use it against future Logia opponents like Enel and the sword rusting guy. Here Zoro has ACoC the answer to the HKs/Gorosei but now has knowledge about the skill and can counter the HKs/Gorosei (Logia).

What do you guys think? @nik87 @Cruxroux @mly90 @Shimotsuki Fenaker @MonsterKaido @HA001 @Orojackson Refugee @grey matter @Monster Zoro's Tesla Supplier etc.
The solution is Tama’s teapot. That’s why
 
#15
What's the problem with Law dying?
Because that would completely undermine Corazon’s sacrifice. The guy gave up everything to secure the kid’s future. And let’s be real, Oda is not writing some mega happy epilogue without Law in it lol. This is Oda we are talking about, be serious.

If Oda wants a bittersweet ending, there is honestly a higher chance of Luffy dying by the end than Law or any other new gen type main player. I feel like Luffy could end up becoming more of a mythical figure, paralleling Roger and Joyboy. Once he completes his grand adventure, he does not really have a purpose left in the world anyways. He’d be fully content and would have achieved absolute freedom.
 
#16
Because that would completely undermine Corazon’s sacrifice. The guy gave up everything to secure the kid’s future. And let’s be real, Oda is not writing some mega happy epilogue without Law in it lol. This is Oda we are talking about, be serious.

If Oda wants a bittersweet ending, there is honestly a higher chance of Luffy dying by the end than Law or any other new gen type main player. I feel like Luffy could end up becoming more of a mythical figure, paralleling Roger and Joyboy. Once he completes his grand adventure, he does not really have a purpose left in the world anyways. He’d be fully content and have achieved total freedom.
That doesn't mean Law has to live a long and peaceful life. Him living and going on to sacrifice himself to help kill the most evil character in their verse as well as the secondary final villain would be a great conclusion to his character as well as a way to show how meaningful Corazon's sacrifice was.
 
#17
That doesn't mean Law has to live a long and peaceful life. Him living and going on to sacrifice himself to help kill the most evil character in their verse as well as the secondary final villain would be a great conclusion to his character as well as a way to show how meaningful Corazon's sacrifice was.
That’s kind of what it means though lol, Corazon’s first instinct was to save a kid from dying early. That’s all he ever wanted for Law.
 
#19
This doesn't mean it's bad writing for Law to sacrifice himself to stop Imu.
Not entirely, but it would still undermine the entire point of Corazon’s sacrifice. And you are forgetting the writing pattern I was talking about. None of the new generation is dying before they see the world they fought to create. If anyone has that kind of fate within the new gen, it is probably Luffy. That kind of role is also what the mid gen characters like Shanks and Dragon exist for.
 
#20
Not entirely, but it would still undermine the entire point of Corazon’s sacrifice and everything he fought for. And you are forgetting the writing pattern I was talking about. None of the new generation is dying before they see the world they fought to create. If anyone has that kind of fate within the new gen, it is probably Luffy. That kind of role is also what the mid gen characters like Shanks and Dragon exist for.
I disagree on the first point but the second is fair.
I don't know for certain if Law is dying against Imu or dying in general, but I was just saying that I don't believe it's really bad writing for him to die against Imu. If he does.
 
Top