Can you boys do me a favor? I don't like that, but I don't know how to do it without going into a big text of explanation. Go to your local AI overlord and ask it this: "Why does it make sense for a leftist to say "all men are trash? Explain their reasoning to me in detail".

Thanks for your attention, I have a reaction to watch in the meantime.
A) a i is unreliable

B) I'm not a man🤣🤣🤣 at least not in the biological sense
 
Can you boys do me a favor? I don't like that, but I don't know how to do it without going into a big text of explanation. Go to your local AI overlord and ask it this: "Why does it make sense for a leftist to say "all men are trash? Explain their reasoning to me in detail".

Thanks for your attention, I have a reaction to watch in the meantime.
I can understand why women might have an issue with men, just like I can understand why someone might be racist

doesnt mean id agree with their generalizations lol
 
The stabbing each others necks thing is bound to become worse as corporate cunts are profiting from conflict. The Palantir guy said something along the lines of no conflict is bad for business.
The polarization in exacerbated by social media is actively being propagated by bad actors in the background whose goal it is to pit different groups against one another and bring civil society to ruin. Whether it's China, the US, Russia, tech bros, temu or whoever.


[automerge]1762360232[/automerge]

They are not.
Ask the boys who live a life of (sexual) abuse at the hands of their own mothers what they think of this phrase. If they are brainwashed enough they might even agree with you.
Some people, thankfully mostly people who are online, seem to believe that it's fine that little boys get molested and manipulated by the women in their life. Because "men are born evil". Like I said before this is just bioessentialism.
It's either that or "Bro you're so lucky that a hot woman slept with you!" ignoring the age gap and/or lack of consent plus the incest (if it's incestuous, although there are cases like teachers molesting kids but ykwim)
 
Nah, it's catchy.
You just summed up why populism works

[automerge]1762361618[/automerge]

molest children or kill their own babies or shoplift
One doesn't belong with the other two🙈

Idk what you mean but I'm not trying to start arguments here or anything like that. I'm just speaking my mind here, all women are trash. I clearly do not have some type of unhealed trauma related to women that is making me act like this!
There's a reason the word femcel exists
 
I ask one simple thing. Something that a 13 year old can do and no one is able to do it. And you guyz are asking me to be reasonnable...

A) a i is unreliable

B) I'm not a man🤣🤣🤣 at least not in the biological sense
Yes, but it's reliable enough for what I'm asking here and noted.


I can understand why women might have an issue with men, just like I can understand why someone might be racist

doesnt mean id agree with their generalizations lol
Did you ask the AI what I asked you to ask? I don't have enough room to make a full size explanation here.


Some people, thankfully mostly people who are online, seem to believe that it's fine that little boys get molested and manipulated by the women in their life. Because "men are born evil". Like I said before this is just bioessentialism.
It's either that or "Bro you're so lucky that a hot woman slept with you!" ignoring the age gap and/or lack of consent plus the incest (if it's incestuous, although there are cases like teachers molesting kids but ykwim)
You won't hear leftists say that. And I guess you ignored what I told you.. as always.
Sigh.. You can't ask for explanation and just have this bad faith attitude mate.


You just summed up why populism works
The purpose of this is to raise questions. For people to ask "why are they saying this"?
 
I ask one simple thing. Something that a 13 year old can do and no one is able to do it. And you guyz are asking me to be reasonnable...


Yes, but it's reliable enough for what I'm asking here and noted.



Did you ask the AI what I asked you to ask? I don't have enough room to make a full size explanation here.



You won't hear leftists say that. And I guess you ignored what I told you.. as always.
Sigh.. You can't ask for explanation and just have this bad faith attitude mate.



The purpose of this is to raise questions. For people to ask "why are they saying this"?
Unlike you I don’t need AI to make reasonable conclusions and frankly I rather avoid using such tool
 
Yes, but it's reliable enough for what I'm asking here and noted.
In the old days people used to say 'Google is your friend', there even was a site letmegooglethatforyou.com that would provide instant results.
Society really fell off.

The purpose of this is to raise questions. For people to ask "why are they saying this"?
The purpose of "deport all foreigners" is for people to ask "why are they saying this"?
 
Unlike you I don’t need AI to make reasonable conclusions and frankly I rather avoid using such tool
I sadly can't seem to be able to dumb down my reasoning enough for you to understand my point, so I'm forced to send you to an AI because it's baby proof in that domain. But if you can't use an AI which is fair, I don't like them either, there is no way for you to understand this concept as I won't go over three lines and make you a big paragraph to explain something as basic as systemization.


In the old days people used to say 'Google is your friend', there even was a site letmegooglethatforyou.com that would provide instant results.
Society really fell off.
Well.. yeah basically. If a thousand of simple explanations here are not enough, I can't help. I literally tried every method and I don't want to talk to you like you are 8 years old. So we are in a bit of a pickle.


The purpose of "deport all foreigners" is for people to ask "why are they saying this"?
You really have the worst and ignorant comparisons lmao. You are completely forgetting the dynamics of power. But as I said, it's useless to explain something when you are not able to understand it. Or maybe I should start REALLY dumbing my rethoric down in order for you people to understand.
 
I sadly can't seem to be able to dumb down my reasoning enough for you to understand my point, so I'm forced to send you to an AI because it's baby proof in that domain. But if you can't use an AI which is fair, I don't like them either, there is no way for you to understand this concept as I won't go over three lines and make you a big paragraph to explain something as basic as systemization.



Well.. yeah basically. If a thousand of simple explanations here are not enough, I can't help. I literally tried every method and I don't want to talk to you like you are 8 years old. So we are in a bit of a pickle.



You really have the worst and ignorant comparisons lmao. You are completely forgetting the dynamics of power. But as I said, it's useless to explain something when you are not able to understand it. Or maybe I should start REALLY dumbing my rethoric down in order for you people to understand.
Reversing or replacing the subject of the sentence is an intellectual exercise that helps you understand what tf you even said.
 
Yeah. It's actually pretty basic stuff. But your reject of both of these is showing that you do not understand - even after me explaining these concepts to you - what both of these means. OR that you do understand but you do not agree, which is even worse and would be a testimony of your rightist alignment.
I mean, acab is inherently a generalization fallacy.
:kayneshrug:
[automerge]1762371655[/automerge]
Go to your local AI overlord
Ai overlord agrees that one can be racist towards white people
[automerge]1762371687[/automerge]
at least not in the biological sense
Alien?
 
Last edited:
I mean, acab is inherently a generalization fallacy.
:kayneshrug:
Nop. As I explained, words have significations. If you strip the sociological context of a word, you can strip it of its essence. In this case, by stripping the contextual informations of "Acab", you are yourself doing the fallacy by reducing the argument to a fallacious blank strawman argumentation. Talk about Acab in its systemic sense or do not.

Ai overlord agrees that one can be racist towards white people
Lmao Did you caliber yours to talked to you like a 10 yo?
 
Lmao Did you caliber yours to talked to you like a 10 yo?
Nope, it just gets how language works and you do not.
[automerge]1762373599[/automerge]
Nop. As I explained, words have significations. If you strip the sociological context of a word, you can strip it of its essence. In this case, by stripping the contextual informations of "Acab", you are yourself doing the fallacy by reducing the argument to a fallacious blank strawman argumentation. Talk about Acab in its systemic sense or do not.
Acab stands for all cops are bastards.
If the message you want to convey is "the structure of our society fosters a climate that enables violence among the executive" then find an acronym for it.
Until then acab still means ALL cops are bastards.
:zosleepy:
 
Top