Future Events When Sanji unlocks Conqueror's Haki, would that affect people's opinions on Sanji's character?
- Thread starter Warchief Sanji D Goat
- Start date
I agree that his dream wasn't exactly the point, because his captors didn't know or care about it anyway. What I mean is meeting an obstruction and then making a decision with the implication of yielding. I think that makes him unlike the others.
I think it's legit amazing that you are gonna insist on that.
Whatever helps you to sleep at night, I guess.
Whatever helps you to sleep at night, I guess.
It's mfers like you and @Sir Yasheen that engage with these dickheads like they're acting in good faith though.
You questioned Sanji getting it because he was too much subservient due to the stussy dog thing.
I told you that "subservient" thing is BS as Harald, a coc user, willingly offered himself to become WG's S-L-A-V-E in order to achieve his goal.
You then started to come up with a bunch of other traits for Harald as if I was saying Sanji=Harald, when I just pointed out your "subservient" argument is BS when multiple times in the story coc characters acted in "non-dominant" ways.
Luffy specifically in sabaody bowing down to Boa and asking to de-stone the other chicks was pointed out as an unusual thing for someone with coc to do by the old lady.
Roger begged WB and Oden for Oden to join his crew and help him.
Shanks let the mountain bozo shit on him because there wasn't anything relevant to fight over.
etc.
Throughout the entire story there have been coc users that completely break the narrative of what this retarded fandom deems "coc worthy".
Whether or not you are capable of seeing that, it's up to you.
I told you that "subservient" thing is BS as Harald, a coc user, willingly offered himself to become WG's S-L-A-V-E in order to achieve his goal.
You then started to come up with a bunch of other traits for Harald as if I was saying Sanji=Harald, when I just pointed out your "subservient" argument is BS when multiple times in the story coc characters acted in "non-dominant" ways.
Luffy specifically in sabaody bowing down to Boa and asking to de-stone the other chicks was pointed out as an unusual thing for someone with coc to do by the old lady.
Roger begged WB and Oden for Oden to join his crew and help him.
Shanks let the mountain bozo shit on him because there wasn't anything relevant to fight over.
etc.
Throughout the entire story there have been coc users that completely break the narrative of what this retarded fandom deems "coc worthy".
Whether or not you are capable of seeing that, it's up to you.
Theorizing and all that I understand but this really isn’t even that
You’re both arguing over the way you interpret a character’s actions/personality
They can’t force you to see their POV and you can’t force them to see yours
Its just one of those “agree to disagree” situations
You’re both arguing over the way you interpret a character’s actions/personality
They can’t force you to see their POV and you can’t force them to see yours
Its just one of those “agree to disagree” situations
No, especially not if those dreams aren't mutually exclusive.
Zoro would die before living in a world where he doesn't help Luffy become PK, and he'd even die before letting Sanjie die. Sanji would die before letting someone harm Nami... except he could've been 50 years old married to Pudding as a Charlotte slave while Nami was getting reamed by Charloss.
Zoro would die before living in a world where he doesn't help Luffy become PK, and he'd even die before letting Sanjie die. Sanji would die before letting someone harm Nami... except he could've been 50 years old married to Pudding as a Charlotte slave while Nami was getting reamed by Charloss.
You questioned Sanji getting it because he was too much subservient due to the stussy dog thing.
I told you that "subservient" thing is BS as Harald, a coc user, willingly offered himself to become WG's S-L-A-V-E in order to achieve his goal.
You then started to come up with a bunch of other traits for Harald as if I was saying Sanji=Harald, when I just pointed out your "subservient" argument is BS when multiple times in the story coc characters acted in "non-dominant" ways.
Luffy specifically in sabaody bowing down to Boa and asking to de-stone the other chicks was pointed out as an unusual thing for someone with coc to do by the old lady.
Roger begged WB and Oden for Oden to join his crew and help him.
Shanks let the mountain bozo shit on him because there wasn't anything relevant to fight over.
etc.
Throughout the entire story there have been coc users that completely break the narrative of what this retarded fandom deems "coc worthy".
Whether or not you are capable of seeing that, it's up to you.
I told you that "subservient" thing is BS as Harald, a coc user, willingly offered himself to become WG's S-L-A-V-E in order to achieve his goal.
You then started to come up with a bunch of other traits for Harald as if I was saying Sanji=Harald, when I just pointed out your "subservient" argument is BS when multiple times in the story coc characters acted in "non-dominant" ways.
Luffy specifically in sabaody bowing down to Boa and asking to de-stone the other chicks was pointed out as an unusual thing for someone with coc to do by the old lady.
Roger begged WB and Oden for Oden to join his crew and help him.
Shanks let the mountain bozo shit on him because there wasn't anything relevant to fight over.
etc.
Throughout the entire story there have been coc users that completely break the narrative of what this retarded fandom deems "coc worthy".
Whether or not you are capable of seeing that, it's up to you.
Sanji simps for any woman, and no, that's not the same as a man offering himself with a specific goal in mind. He didn't just go around offering himself to anyone, and if they wanted him to be a slave without any promises for his people it wouldn't have worked.
He danced for five years under the impression that it would lead to his goal. Again, not a bright character or one I really like, but this is still different from yielding. When Oden found out they played him, he didn't sit down and cry about it
Post automatically merged:
Zoro would’ve let Luffy die if the offer was a lifetime in impel down or Luffys life
Believing also that Zoro would surrender without taking the effort to free himself is equally dubious. We already saw Shiki cut his legs off to break free, and we've seen Zoro try to do the same when trapped. You think Zoro would actually accept a lifetime?
YES. EXACTLY. THAT'S JUST A GAG.
You are ALMOST there.
ALMOST.
I believe in you.
You are ALMOST there.
ALMOST.
I believe in you.
Post automatically merged:
Yet our boy has rejected more women than any other member of the crew
The fact that the other males are essentially asexual means that such things are irrelevant to them, so nothing to flex