So you acknowledge that your issue is jumping the gun and making assumptions, but act disappointed when someone doesn't like being strawmanned?
If you want a metaphor. Look at my reasonning as someone telling you that the puzzle that you just made is beautiful (or bad)... when in reality you only put your second piece and the person, who already made the puzzle in her head, is trying to make you feel the same way as they feels.
If someone says men on average have more physical strength than woman, you will swoop in and claim they are enabling the patriarchy by pushing men>women rhetoric, making them sexist. It doesnt take a genius to know why you fail.
As for your ex, no. I would probably tell them that they are right. There is no reason to say that women on average have equal strength as men. Unless there is an info I do not have. On the other hand, the fact that they would say that randomly would - just like I did with you here - raise concern. As such I would be calling out the sexism of the rethoric of this person based NOT on their sentences which is irrelevant, but because of the contextual informations with said sentence and the need of the person to affirmate something that only sexist people do.
Here, I just took on me the time to explain to you my reasoning, butn a normal discussion this would go like that:
- "Women have more physical strength than women"
- "Why are you saying that?
"> That's if I'm in a good mood.
- "Women have more physical strength than women"
- "You don't have to show your sexism"

> That's if I'm in a bad mood.
As you can see. I always jump ahead (and I didn't realize until now that it was also something that I did on internet) and you would be right on my behavior. But the reasoning is always solid and therefore you would be wrong on the reason why I did that.
This pretty much encompass our entire conflictual interactions here. I thought I was able to show a better reasoning in virtual because of the text format, but this is obviously not the case.
This will be hard to compensate..
Last edited:




