Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
It's a horrible idea.
Since there's no such thing as company closure and since wealth is "distributed" among workers, there was no incentive to cut costs or innovate, cause workers weren't hurt by working for a company with losses. So you can imagine why there's no innovation or long term strategic goals.
It didn't matter how workers performed since they got the same benefits, good workers have no incentive to work well, bad workers could relax.
Then that goes back to borrowing money to sustain these badly operating companies... And so you go into debt, inflation, economic collapse etc.
Since there's no such thing as company closure and since wealth is "distributed" among workers, there was no incentive to cut costs or innovate, cause workers weren't hurt by working for a company with losses. So you can imagine why there's no innovation or long term strategic goals.
It didn't matter how workers performed since they got the same benefits, good workers have no incentive to work well, bad workers could relax.
Then that goes back to borrowing money to sustain these badly operating companies... And so you go into debt, inflation, economic collapse etc.
Why would worker stop trying to make their life better once they share the means of productions or even innovate?
Do you really believe that innovation can't be created for innovative purpose rather than competitive ones?
In a socialist society, the value of work would be completely different in nature. Some people would find value in jobs that we currently despise and the same in reverse.
Isn't it a bit cynical to think that we only try to do some productive things because of incentives? What if that was a fallacious thinking and that in reality, the value of work could be found without this incentive of productivity?
Even regulated, its structure create exploitation by nature. This can't disappear simply because of regulations sadly... It's immanent of the system..
Capitalism will always create exploitation.. and therefore oppression. It can't be another way.
Do you really believe that innovation can't be created for innovative purpose rather than competitive ones?
In a socialist society, the value of work would be completely different in nature. Some people would find value in jobs that we currently despise and the same in reverse.
Isn't it a bit cynical to think that we only try to do some productive things because of incentives? What if that was a fallacious thinking and that in reality, the value of work could be found without this incentive of productivity?
Even regulated, its structure create exploitation by nature. This can't disappear simply because of regulations sadly... It's immanent of the system..
Capitalism will always create exploitation.. and therefore oppression. It can't be another way.
What happened and still happening in reality is state capitalism. A sub form of the state of transition between capitalism and communism. Only one of the form that can take the passage between capitalism and socialism. A form that not only had internal problems but also was completely shutdown by capitalism itself. In other words, something that can only or mostly go bad.
This is not what I described.
This is not what I described.
How bout a society where people can afford basic necessities for full-time work on minimum wage like before? When you can make 5x minimum wage and still cant afford the basics there's a serious problem.
I highly doubt paying people the same for different types of work is very smart though. Good luck convincing a construction or trash worker that he deserves the same pay as a receptionist.
I highly doubt paying people the same for different types of work is very smart though. Good luck convincing a construction or trash worker that he deserves the same pay as a receptionist.
This is about as ass backwards as the old medieval paintings where they drew the demons with their genitals and facial features swapped
It's about power to these people. If the laws stop them from killing and raping who they want, they'll just change the laws with threats and bribery until they can.
Makes you wonder if the hits on Democratic lawmakers in 2025 were state sponsored.
[automerge]1767495011[/automerge]
Greenland better watch out, these terrorists are rabid.
NATO never had anything to do with protecting Europe, is was always about furthering US business interests while European parasite rulers sold their people out to profit off of fucking up non-European nations for the rich.
Interested to see how the European rulers flop around after this latest escalation.
Any of them who want to say the freaks blackmailing Trump with his sex tapes would never invade Europe, should study the past better, especially the part where weak, gutless European rulers pretending to be leaders said Hitler would NEVER invade Poland.
Yes, he would, because he's a criminal who profits off of killing people.
Duh.
Last edited:
It’s not cynical, it’s simply how the human mind is. 99% of people aren’t selfless enough to do hard work and expect no personal gain. Sure, a lot of people do charity or volunteering too in their lives but majority of the hard work they do (especially in their professional lives) is done for incentive of a higher pay and a better life. Most people don’t wanna waste their time and energy to get nothing in return. Human nature isn’t gonna magically change in a socialist society. It sounds idealistic and is a great idea on paper but competition is very necessary in a market.
Foreign nationals. Pardon my French.
When you realize multinational corporations and states function in similar ways it will all make sense.
When global travel breaks down due to lack of fuel/planes and/or general cultural decline, the US might just shift their focus entirely to central and south America.
Be ready conejos
No that's the best case.
The word you're looking for is survivors' bias
When you realize multinational corporations and states function in similar ways it will all make sense.
When global travel breaks down due to lack of fuel/planes and/or general cultural decline, the US might just shift their focus entirely to central and south America.
Be ready conejos
No that's the best case.
Capitalism is the most successful economic system out of everything which was tried in history, but if you think of something better, make a suggestion. As long as it isn't socialism.
