Powers & Abilities Both Nika and Imu don’t have Black Blades
- Thread starter ImmaIvanoM
- Start date
This is the manga of one piece
Btw there’s nothing stopping this Glaive weapon Imu is using from being a common weapon he always uses since the ancient kingdom
my point is that once every fight is done, he de-summons it from existence and then re-summons it again into existence when he gets into such fights.
get it? It’s can be a weapon Imu always uses but it simply doesn’t exist until he summons it
Btw there’s nothing stopping this Glaive weapon Imu is using from being a common weapon he always uses since the ancient kingdom
my point is that once every fight is done, he de-summons it from existence and then re-summons it again into existence when he gets into such fights.
get it? It’s can be a weapon Imu always uses but it simply doesn’t exist until he summons it
Last edited:
Oda chose not to put a sword in Imu’s hands so that Imu doesn’t interfere in Zoro’s dream
Oda chose to put a sword in Shanks in hands in chapter 1, introduce Zoro and his dream in chapter 4, introduce Mihawk in chapter 50 and then reveal that Mihawk no longer sees Shanks as w fighting in chapter 96.
Oda chose all the above events intentionally and 1100 chapters later, Zoro still thinks Mihawk is the strongest swordsman in the world.
Zoro knows Shanks is a swordsman. Zoro has fought Fujitora, an admiral swordsman. Zoro has fought S-hawk a Mihawk clone with extra powers. Zoro has fought Big mom, a Yonko swordsman. Zoro has fought Nusjuro a demonic Gorosei swordsman.
Zoro has fought and/or is aware of all the above top tier swordsmen and after 1100 chapters Zoro believes Mihawk is the strongest swordsman Alive across the entire surface of the One piece planet
maybe Zoro is wrong, but then you have to account for the massive story implications of Zoro being wrong such as Zoro isn’t going to fight Shanks, ever.
Oda chose to put a sword in Shanks in hands in chapter 1, introduce Zoro and his dream in chapter 4, introduce Mihawk in chapter 50 and then reveal that Mihawk no longer sees Shanks as w fighting in chapter 96.
Oda chose all the above events intentionally and 1100 chapters later, Zoro still thinks Mihawk is the strongest swordsman in the world.
Zoro knows Shanks is a swordsman. Zoro has fought Fujitora, an admiral swordsman. Zoro has fought S-hawk a Mihawk clone with extra powers. Zoro has fought Big mom, a Yonko swordsman. Zoro has fought Nusjuro a demonic Gorosei swordsman.
Zoro has fought and/or is aware of all the above top tier swordsmen and after 1100 chapters Zoro believes Mihawk is the strongest swordsman Alive across the entire surface of the One piece planet
maybe Zoro is wrong, but then you have to account for the massive story implications of Zoro being wrong such as Zoro isn’t going to fight Shanks, ever.
Here it’s Imu intro page, and he has a special / never seen before pole arm with a special designed blade
the man is clearly drawn with his fav weapon / weapon of choice
I can see Imu switching from time to time given his unique ability but I can also see him fighting most of the time with that pole arm when it’s really serious
the man is clearly drawn with his fav weapon / weapon of choice
I can see Imu switching from time to time given his unique ability but I can also see him fighting most of the time with that pole arm when it’s really serious
We did plenty of times. As said a thousand times:
1) Black blades are called as such only after they are used, not before, so still trying to sell that "no, don't stop at something that looks exactly like a BB with no hint to be anything different", not only is it baseless, but it's even disproven.
This type of argument may have some space when Aramaki uses his blade, and nothing is said about it.
2) As said thousands of times in these 4 years, Aramaki is based on someone, called btw Aramaki too even, who basically kept his sword skills secret. That's why, for the 10.001 time, for Aramaki Oda went for the speculation route and didn't outright have him use the blade.
Yeah, trying to say we shouldn't use our eyes and call a black blade... a black blade because a completely unrelated character made a copy of a super normal, standard white blade is cope.
By this standard, what proof do we have that Shanks' sword isn't in fact only a very convincing replica, just a cracker's lol? or Imu just the same?
BTW, anyway, no: Oda did draw Cracker's armour with a fake sword, but only because Cracker, in his true body, had the original sword in his possession. Craker had the real Pretzel, which he used on screen.
You want to theorise the same for Aramaki, even though there are no hints? Cool, then what we saw was a replica and Aramaki still possesses the real, totally equivalent Black blade.
1) Black blades are called as such only after they are used, not before, so still trying to sell that "no, don't stop at something that looks exactly like a BB with no hint to be anything different", not only is it baseless, but it's even disproven.
This type of argument may have some space when Aramaki uses his blade, and nothing is said about it.
2) As said thousands of times in these 4 years, Aramaki is based on someone, called btw Aramaki too even, who basically kept his sword skills secret. That's why, for the 10.001 time, for Aramaki Oda went for the speculation route and didn't outright have him use the blade.
Yeah, trying to say we shouldn't use our eyes and call a black blade... a black blade because a completely unrelated character made a copy of a super normal, standard white blade is cope.
By this standard, what proof do we have that Shanks' sword isn't in fact only a very convincing replica, just a cracker's lol? or Imu just the same?
BTW, anyway, no: Oda did draw Cracker's armour with a fake sword, but only because Cracker, in his true body, had the original sword in his possession. Craker had the real Pretzel, which he used on screen.
You want to theorise the same for Aramaki, even though there are no hints? Cool, then what we saw was a replica and Aramaki still possesses the real, totally equivalent Black blade.
Last edited:
There is no confirmation that Aramaki has a black blade just because his sword was colored in black
Obviously Broggy didn't have a black blade when his axe was turned black
Until it is outright stated to be a black blade, treating it as a black blade is just headcanon
Obviously Broggy didn't have a black blade when his axe was turned black
Until it is outright stated to be a black blade, treating it as a black blade is just headcanon
Greenbull however is an ordinary guy with an ordinary blade and we saw multiple, colored versions of him (including the vivre card) where the edge is indeed black, not once retconned. And never in the history of the manga have we seen a character who has a blade with naturally dark/black edge (outside of Kokutos). Every blade in the manga that is not a Kokuto, consistently has a white edge. Why would Greenbull's sword be the sole exception? A dark edge in this manga is what differentiates a normal blade from a Kokuto or a blade clad in armament Haki.