Powers & Abilities No, Harald never thought he was inferior to Ragnir

Did Harald think he was inferior to Ragnir ?


  • Total voters
    21
#23
The people in the story are characters and not all are motivated by an unlimited quest for power. Harald had no reason to have Ragnir until he was possessed . It’s kind of a feat that makes Loki look more impressive in isolation than what he actually is . His father was not like Loki , he was closer to a pacifist .
The thing is nonetheless harald was aware of its power and still was convinced only post imu buff could he tame/beat ragnir. It is highly possible he tried getting ragnir before meeting ida and hence know about its power. So its ridiculous loki hype given 16 year old loki in human terms beat someone someone than base harald who was already xebec's equal who in turn was a rival to roger himself.
 
#26
How do you gather that? He was much stronger than his 16 year old son without the buff prior to him getting his hands on ragnir.
The rodent submitted to Loki after a simple clash.
This was a flashback fight. Like how long oden vs Kaido lasted? Oden also beat Kaido in one attack during flashack.

Oda wrote 16 year old loki > Ragnir > Base harald = Rocks = Roger/Garp.
 
#27
This was a flashback fight. Like how long oden vs Kaido lasted? Oden also beat Kaido in one attack during flashack.

Oda wrote 16 year old loki > Ragnir > Base harald = Rocks = Roger/Garp.
You will realize this is not the proper way to consume the series when oda’s fetish for his Gary Stu ,saint shanks throws a wrench in your calculation.
Is it possible he is still stronger than shanks yes , is it possible he was stronger than all those people at 16 sure but its not absolute.

No one had wielded xxxx is just another way of saying the one destined to wield it hasn’t arrived in one piece . It’s the same sensationalist bullshit oda did with Enma or the gomu gomu no mi.
 
#28
You will realize this is not the proper way to consume the series when oda’s fetish for his Gary Stu ,saint shanks throws a wrench in your calculation.
Is it possible he is still stronger than shanks yes , is it possible he was stronger than all those people at 16 sure but its not absolute.

No one had wielded xxxx is just another way of saying the one destined to wield it hasn’t arrived in one piece . It’s the same sensationalist bullshit oda did with Enma or the gomu gomu no mi.
All we know is shanks captured loki. Capture =/= defeating a character like queen capturing BM. And if shanks did beat loki directly , it simply means shanks was that strong and his haki comparison with joyboy was legit.
 
#29
All we know is shanks captured loki. Capture =/= defeating a character like queen capturing BM. And if shanks did beat loki directly , it simply means shanks was that strong and his haki comparison with joyboy was legit.
So shanks would be stronger than all those characters you mentioned….. the slippery slope continues
 
#30
I was skeptical myself when the chapter dropped and the wording implied only now with his strength he could do it but then we cut to Loki and hit it one time so i’m thinking it was kinda weird. However maybe it has to do with the freeze hax which again hypes Ragnir’s power, when it comes to Loki it looks like he just simply took a liking to the guy.
 
#34
Correct and until that gets a full answer it will remain a grey area .
Not for me. Imu and gaban both considered HK amped harald unbeatable and threat to the world and gaban knows how powerful shanks/WB were. Yet loki beat the shit out of HK harald and beat harald. Loki is god tier confirmed, Only below imu and joyboy/OG Nika.
 
#35
That was fruitless Ragnir tho
Ragnir chose to submit though, knowing how strong he is and how strong Loki is based on the clash. Oda's intention here is pretty clear, Ragnir isn't really on the same level as fruitless Loki, who is at best, a little stronger than pre HK Harald
 

ConquistadoR

The Rogue Prince
#37
You will realize this is not the proper way to consume the series when oda’s fetish for his Gary Stu ,saint shanks throws a wrench in your calculation.
Is it possible he is still stronger than shanks yes , is it possible he was stronger than all those people at 16 sure but its not absolute.

No one had wielded xxxx is just another way of saying the one destined to wield it hasn’t arrived in one piece . It’s the same sensationalist bullshit oda did with Enma or the gomu gomu no mi.


Riddle me this Lanji.... why is it so that most of the "Ragnir > Harald" guys.... end up being the same ones who pushed horrible takes regarding YCs & Warlords until Oda supposedly "retconned" the scale with the post-Wano bounties?
 
#38


Riddle me this Lanji.... why is it so that most of the "Ragnir > Harald" guys.... end up being the same ones who pushed horrible takes regarding YCs & Warlords until Oda supposedly "retconned" the scale with the post-Wano bounties?
Bro still thinks its 2016 or something, still whining about commanders and warlords in 2026, hilarious:milaugh:
 
#39
Ragnir chose to submit though, knowing how strong he is and how strong Loki is based on the clash. Oda's intention here is pretty clear, Ragnir isn't really on the same level as fruitless Loki, who is at best, a little stronger than pre HK Harald
Sure, Loki proved himself to be sufficiently strong to Ragnir, but what would happen if Ragnir chose to keep fighting him? Ragnir got a bump on his head from the clash, but Loki had his hammer completely shattered. Wouldn’t Ragnir beat an unarmed Loki?
 
#40
Sure, Loki proved himself to be sufficiently strong to Ragnir, but what would happen if Ragnir chose to keep fighting him? Ragnir got a bump on his head from the clash, but Loki had his hammer completely shattered. Wouldn’t Ragnir beat an unarmed Loki?
Loki would just get another hammer
 
Top