Volume 115 - Discussion Thread (July 3rd, 2026)

Lol at the raging.

Anyway, no. I said around 50-55 was my prime estimate for his age, but I said multiple times that 48 too was possible too (30 at Marijoa), even though that was low for me:



Instead, he was 25 and not 30.

On the other hand, It was proven too that Xebec and Roger weren't of the same age, as obvious. In fact, there Is basically the same distanze from Roger to Xebec compared to actual Xebec to 30.

But unilike others, I know when to take my L. I thought 30 at Marijoa was the bare minimum; he was 25. So, I take the L :kayneshrug:.
I'm not raging, I'm vindicated for constantly being right and you constantly being wrong but still arguing with me for pages and pages like you're trying to do again now.

I literally quoted your post shithead, everyone can see it, you said 55, which would make him 16 years older than Roger and 37(?) at Mariejois lmfaoooo.

I never said they were the same age, I said around the name age, four years difference qualifies for that.
 
I'm not raging, I'm vindicated for constantly being right and you constantly being wrong but still arguing with me for pages and pages like you're trying to do again now.
:Rofl:

I slapped you with the truth more time than I can even count lol.

Kizaru feeding Luffy?
Akainu's bounty?

And so on, the list of your Ls is as long as you can make It.

I literally quoted your post shithead, everyone can see it, you said 55, which would make him 16 years older than Roger and 37(?) at Mariejois lmfaoooo
I know reading is not your forte, but I literally posted you the proof of what I was saying. I'll do It again, maybe you skipped It the first time.

Rocks was at least 30 at Marijoa (56 years ago). And that's conservative.
I never said they were the same age, I said around the name age, four years difference qualifies for that.
And they were not lol.

His actual age is actually in the middle from Roger's age and my lowest esteem proven by facts.

But again, I take my L. I said at least 30; he was 25, so my L.
 
:Rofl:

I slapped you with the truth more time than I can even count lol.

Kizaru feeding Luffy?
Akainu's bounty?

And so on, the list of your Ls is as long as you can make It.
That is all in your mind, you are a walking L magnet.
I know reading is not your forte, but I literally posted you the proof of what I was saying. I'll do It again, maybe you skipped It the first time.
That's literally from a couple months ago long after I schooled you on this topic, obviously the writing was on the wall and you tried to pretend like you never had him at 55 during God Valley, sadly for you though, I never forget, and neither does your post history.

And even then, you downplay it as "conservative" and ridicule people for thinking he was in his 20s, which he was as Oda confirmed lmfao.
I don't want to sound rude, but anyone who looks at Rocks's face and thinks he was 20 or near 20, I honestly think is in dire need of a pair of glasses:
And they were not lol.

His actual age is actually in the middle from Roger's age and my lowest esteem proven by facts.
You're an idiot, two characters being a mere four years apart in age is literally "around the same age."
But again, I take my L. I said at least 30; he was 25, so my L.
You said 37 in Mariejois and 55 in God Valley as I quoted, when in reality, it was barely 20s Xebec that neg diffed the Admiral.
 
That is all in your mind, you are a walking L magnet.

That's literally from a couple months ago long after I schooled you on this topic, obviously the writing was on the wall and you tried to pretend like you never had him at 55 during God Valley, sadly for you though, I never forget, and neither does your post history.

And even then, you downplay it as "conservative" and ridicule people for thinking he was in his 20s, which he was as Oda confirmed lmfao.


You're an idiot, two characters being a mere four years apart in age is literally "around the same age."

You said 37 in Mariejois and 55 in God Valley as I quoted, when in reality, it was barely 20s Xebec that neg diffed the Admiral.
So no answers to your long list of Ls lol?

I literally quoted you my stance form months ago and before the release, so again no excuses. To summarize (again): above 50 was my Ideal age, but I was willing to go down to 48 as I proved. I can find other posts, but it's not worth It since I have already took the L.

Sure, my L being Xebec Is as far from my lowest estimate as he is from Roger's age, but an L Is an L.

Again, I was wrong by 5 years at least so I take my L. Unlike many here btw, but what is fair is fair.
 
Xebec was young when he negged an Admiral. He is just like Garp and Roger, he started off his career at a very young age, I think around 18 years old, the year when Loki was born. Then messing around for 7 years until he reached Holy Land. He wasn't in his late 30s like many people said lmao.
 
People really loved to make fun of Kaido for losing to the series' protagonist, who is in his early twenties. But Xebec—without any plot armor, without receiving tons of help, and without even being the protagonist—killed an admiral.
 
So, Xebec's timeline:

81 years ago: Was born on God Valley in the West Blue
56 years ago: Raids Mariejois, killing an Admiral, kidnapping five kings, meets Imu and Harald (25 years old)
48 years ago: His crew lands on Elbaf, the first time he met Loki (33 years old)
44 years ago: Forms the Rocks Pirates and takes over Fullalead/Hachinosu (37 years old)
40 years ago: Marries Eris and has a son (41 years old)
38 years ago: Dies at the God Valley Incident (43 years old)
 
Top