Lol at the raging.
Anyway, no. I said around 50-55 was my prime estimate for his age, but I said multiple times that 48 too was possible too (30 at Marijoa), even though that was low for me:
Instead, he was 25 and not 30.
On the other hand, It was proven too that Xebec and Roger weren't of the same age, as obvious. In fact, there Is basically the same distanze from Roger to Xebec compared to actual Xebec to 30.
But unilike others, I know when to take my L. I thought 30 at Marijoa was the bare minimum; he was 25. So, I take the L
.
Anyway, no. I said around 50-55 was my prime estimate for his age, but I said multiple times that 48 too was possible too (30 at Marijoa), even though that was low for me:
Instead, he was 25 and not 30.
On the other hand, It was proven too that Xebec and Roger weren't of the same age, as obvious. In fact, there Is basically the same distanze from Roger to Xebec compared to actual Xebec to 30.
But unilike others, I know when to take my L. I thought 30 at Marijoa was the bare minimum; he was 25. So, I take the L
.
I literally quoted your post shithead, everyone can see it, you said 55, which would make him 16 years older than Roger and 37(?) at Mariejois lmfaoooo.
I never said they were the same age, I said around the name age, four years difference qualifies for that.

