There is no reason for Oda to have Luffy state "That is the same color of armament I can use", if there wasn't different affinities that other people can use. Regular hardening is step one, and then it should branch off from there. When Luffy amplifies his CoA, sparks start to flicker from his fist. When Zoro amplifies his CoA it tends to ooze out in a fluid like state. You can't tell me they aren't doing something different.
Questions & Mysteries Does Zoro have Internal Destruction Haki?
- Thread starter bennbeckman
- Start date
and what color of armament was it that luffy can use? Hardening. SO as i said, unless you want to argue everyone with hardening has affinity for penetration haki, you wont be making any sense. And why should this be about what oozes out of zoros sword/luffys fist? And didnt the shit that happened with enma look just like what happens with luffy?
So far there has not been a rule that say that there are different CoA affinities that prevents someone to master everything CoA related.
Until such is stablished we can rely on facts like swordmans are adept CoA users so they can unlock everything ( with the proper master I think).
(At least with FS we know only few can unlock it)
Until such is stablished we can rely on facts like swordmans are adept CoA users so they can unlock everything ( with the proper master I think).
(At least with FS we know only few can unlock it)
That was if Mihawk taught him like Rayleigh (like a personal teacher, being with his student every second and all that), but I highly doubt it.
Mihawk probably told him the "theory" behind Haki and Zoro with that learned through the fight against those monkeys each day.
And despite Luffy having a more personal and caring teacher, more like a true master-apprentice relationship between them, he wasn't able to master that Haki then. And Luffy is the more talented and monstruous guy in the crew in terms of fightning. MC and same blood as Garp, Dragon and is a D.
Mihawk probably told him the "theory" behind Haki and Zoro with that learned through the fight against those monkeys each day.
And despite Luffy having a more personal and caring teacher, more like a true master-apprentice relationship between them, he wasn't able to master that Haki then. And Luffy is the more talented and monstruous guy in the crew in terms of fightning. MC and same blood as Garp, Dragon and is a D.
You didn't answer my question. If there wasn't different affinities for CoA, then why did Oda have Luffy make that specific statement to show a clear distinction? That scene would be completely unnecessary otherwise. "That's the same one I can use." Nope, everyone with CoA can use it, so what's the point in Luffy saying what he just said? That makes no sense.
Luffy clearly has guide/intructor for this type of haki. First Rayleigh and some pointers from Hyogoro. What Zoro has? Just by obtaining Enma you guys thinks Zoro also have the same of Luffy. What a joke. You guys Zoro fan should be imagine something diffrent from Luffy. It should COA advanced Haki for swordsman that can Cut anything. You guys a swordman be proud of it. Sanji has advace COO which is not future sight but he can hear the voice of woman. Although it seem useless it fit Sanji personality. Dont just copy what Luffy has swordman also have.
because its still part of the coa branch, as you yourself said? and i said hardening, not just coa. Luffy could use hardening at that point while saying "thats the same coa i can use", so if you want to argue this is some affinity of luffy, then everyone with hardening should have that affinity, because luffy wasnt able to use anything else at that point. . . .
To make it clear thats still part of CoA and that luffy could tell as much?
Because rayleigh said haki can generally be divided into 2 categories. . .
To make it clear thats still part of CoA and that luffy could tell as much?
Because rayleigh said haki can generally be divided into 2 categories. . .
Enma just a sword that injured Kaido and defeated sword with Oden, compare to Shusui was a sword that has turn black and undefeated sword with Ryuma. Enma is a downgrade rather than upgrade. Any sword in Zoro hand not been using or been used properly by Oda?? Sandai Kitetsu is a cursed sword but we never seen any curse. What is the power of Wado no ???? They are just a over hype named sword. It just that you can beat your enemy with one sword use two sword. If still can beaten use three sword and so on
There are different applications of Armament Haki. This isn't about level 1, 2 or 3. Luffy's affinity progresses to internal destruction Haki, as it is fitting for his character.
In order for Zoro to be able to acquire internal destruction Haki, that would mean he would need to have the same exact affinity for CoA as Luffy does, which again as I stated is pointless for a Swordsman. Why would you want Zoro to have an advanced form of CoA that is useless for his character? Instead, he should have a different affinity, so whatever advanced form he gains actually benefits him.
In order for Zoro to be able to acquire internal destruction Haki, that would mean he would need to have the same exact affinity for CoA as Luffy does, which again as I stated is pointless for a Swordsman. Why would you want Zoro to have an advanced form of CoA that is useless for his character? Instead, he should have a different affinity, so whatever advanced form he gains actually benefits him.
So this is your excuse for a Swordsman having it because he Luffy teacher. Lmao stop the BS. Zoro doesn't have internal Haki, but its not because he a Swordsman. He just didn't learn it yet and yall should stop acting so mighty when Zpro fans been telling yall Zoro CoA was superior to Luffy for years and was proven right again.
Wait what? Why cant Hyo can't turn his sword black? Where you getting this shit from?
Post automatically merged:
Wait what? Why cant Hyo can't turn his sword black? Where you getting this shit from?
