But I would say that it would actually be disingenuous if he continued to argue for shanks beating mihawk just because you can technically still argue for Shanks beating Mihawk, despite being convinced otherwise.
Then I could say he's only arguing for the sake of it, because he's a shanks-tard. I've seen shanks-tards themselves admit that on paper Mihawk beats shanks, even if they don't like the idea of it because of shanks's portrayal, so it's just one of those things.
I know Galaxy and he's not lying, he's just been convinced because he's spent time in powerscaling platforms where people tend to have Mihawk > Shanks, so he's been exposed to those arguments.
He's gone through phases of denial and then acceptance, and now he actually feels the need to double down on MIhawk > Shanks, because having that position is less of a headache and allows him to focus on other aspects of these characters in terms of narrative, than constantly powerscaling.
Then I could say he's only arguing for the sake of it, because he's a shanks-tard. I've seen shanks-tards themselves admit that on paper Mihawk beats shanks, even if they don't like the idea of it because of shanks's portrayal, so it's just one of those things.
I know Galaxy and he's not lying, he's just been convinced because he's spent time in powerscaling platforms where people tend to have Mihawk > Shanks, so he's been exposed to those arguments.
He's gone through phases of denial and then acceptance, and now he actually feels the need to double down on MIhawk > Shanks, because having that position is less of a headache and allows him to focus on other aspects of these characters in terms of narrative, than constantly powerscaling.
He didn’t go and pull new arguments out of thin air or pretend that the ones he’d already used hadn’t been refuted by Manga which is quite respectable tbh.






