Powers & Abilities SSSS - Sword Swallower's Supreme Sword
- Thread starter nik87
- Start date
"Criticising a flawed power system" and "creating own criterias for certain abilities" can mutually co-exist, you know that right? 
No they do not lmao.
It ain't even that flawed to begin with. It has sime issues but nothing like literally anything can happen.
Even in a flawed system, bro managed to creste his own criteria to prove his agenda lmao. That's peak hypocrisy, nothing I didn't expected.
How does someone with 3 years on the forum and no one complained.
And out of sudden it's only one fandom says so because they can't disprove you lol.
Even the kaidou/Loki thread was entire speculations and current sizr comparison. But y'all retard read it as something else entirely lmao. And I'm the one with issues in english.
And out of sudden it's only one fandom says so because they can't disprove you lol.
Even the kaidou/Loki thread was entire speculations and current sizr comparison. But y'all retard read it as something else entirely lmao. And I'm the one with issues in english.
Yeah, literally what I stated.
You believe the ACoC system is not that flawed when you were mostly wrong about your takes when it comes to ACoC visuals lmao. Luffy hardly demonstrated any of these visuals when he even fought Imu. What's your excuse to that?
Fenaker would actually be better off if YOU weren't defending him here lmao.
You believe the ACoC system is not that flawed when you were mostly wrong about your takes when it comes to ACoC visuals lmao. Luffy hardly demonstrated any of these visuals when he even fought Imu. What's your excuse to that?
Fenaker would actually be better off if YOU weren't defending him here lmao.
First of all we are talking about a manga where the situation can change within a few weeks so opinions expressed 5, 6 or 7 years ago don't carry much weight given that Oda has just introduced gods and could decide to create even more outrageous things in the coming months.
Secondly you don't need to be a genius to realize that since we're talking about a manga, the remaining characters will end up being far more powerful than Kaido and Big Mom, especially considering we are still hundreds of chapters away from the finale.
Finally, as i have already told you countless times, to have any kind of discussion you need to establish a starting point.
In your mind Zoro is already superior to characters like the Admirals whereas the reality is completely different but you are too stubborn to accept it.
You did the same thing with Gaban's power level as well as with your refusal to accept that Sanji will unlock coc.
Secondly you don't need to be a genius to realize that since we're talking about a manga, the remaining characters will end up being far more powerful than Kaido and Big Mom, especially considering we are still hundreds of chapters away from the finale.
Finally, as i have already told you countless times, to have any kind of discussion you need to establish a starting point.
In your mind Zoro is already superior to characters like the Admirals whereas the reality is completely different but you are too stubborn to accept it.
You did the same thing with Gaban's power level as well as with your refusal to accept that Sanji will unlock coc.
Imu vs Luffy lacked many of the visuals to the point when some people (like in X) argued that Luffy was somehow avoiding to use it, meanwhile Kuzan vs Garp had all the visuals minus no-touch effect and you somehow denied it. Make it make sense.
No, you got a problem in comprehending things.
Like our previous discussion about Scabbards and Ryuo: I showed you the evidence/source material dozens of times and you still doubled down on your claim that they didn't cut Kaido but instead managed to stab him... which should somehow "prove" that their stabbing attacks were superior to their cutting techniques. This itself makes no sense, they are samurais, they usually cut their enemies.
Like I said, making mistakes when writing English sentences isn't the end of the world - heck, I sure make lots of grammar mistakes as well - but there's a difference in creating linguistic mistakes and having huge reading comprehension issues.
No, you got a problem in comprehending things.
Like our previous discussion about Scabbards and Ryuo: I showed you the evidence/source material dozens of times and you still doubled down on your claim that they didn't cut Kaido but instead managed to stab him... which should somehow "prove" that their stabbing attacks were superior to their cutting techniques. This itself makes no sense, they are samurais, they usually cut their enemies.
Like I said, making mistakes when writing English sentences isn't the end of the world - heck, I sure make lots of grammar mistakes as well - but there's a difference in creating linguistic mistakes and having huge reading comprehension issues.
