I'm not glad he's banned but I genuenly feel he was weird
I don't remember saying anything that would warrant his attitude towards me, unless evil Logiko really is that bad to him
I actually consider Logiko to be quite duplicitous and overly extreme. If you called me the evil Logiko I'd consider it an insult. However, I want to state that my objections to you calling Nameless that had nothing to do with how I'd feel, and of course, Nameless can fight his own battles. My issue was as a Christian that you called Nameless, a follower of god, somehow more evil than Logiko, who would dethrone god. That left a bitter taste in my mouth and made me judge your character and honesty. I admit I was quite aggressive, and for that I do apologise, but I don't think that my argument was without merit. I should have just been more neutral in my tone.
I mean yeah but I think that fits the way they were behaving towards me
In this instance, when you called me disgusting, I didn't particularly care. It isn't because what you said isn't offensive, it's because I've come to consider your words to be bombastic and unintentionally rude. That is to say, I don't think you are as malicious as your tone indicates.
also the reason you find me rude is cause I don't sugarcoat things
I find you rude because you banned my favourite users. Nameless and I don't even see eye to eye often, but his posts tend to be interesting or funny.
Well they're wrong and I'm not
Bro... this is why some people have had an issue with you. It comes across as lacking in humility and self-reflection.
I think I'm right, but I am also aware that I don't know everything. I never declare outright that 'I am right and others are wrong'. The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.