Powers & Abilities Is Law and the Ope Ope no Mi fair game in the WSS competition?
- Thread starter comrade
- Start date
comrade you are embrassing urself bro again Greg said he read them and replied him and oda talked about usopp gallery in a sbs 
Meaningless arbitrary numbers. That’s a great argument. We’ll just ignore all the panels of Law desperately using his sword to fend off attacks, and using his sword to deliver them.
And I thought a scythe was basically the same thing as a sword, so why is Zoro now so heavily nerfed?
A completely vital part of fighting.
And also for attacking, as much as you want to pretend otherwise.
Scan, Injection Shot, Radio Knife, Sterbern...
Marvellous. Zoro is also now completely as powerful with a metal stick. Basically a sword, you know. Same motions to block, defend, deliver attacks.
He wouldn’t be able to cut anything with a metal stick. The keyword there is ”cut”, it needs a blade.
And this still ignores the fact that a fight is about more than just landing attacks. Yeah, if everyone just stood still and let Law land Gamma Knife on them he could win without his sword. Thing is, fights don’t work like that.
When will you get that what is relevant is what Law actually does, not what your fanfiction version of him.
“Slice“ shows that it is a cut. Cutting is done with a sharp weapon, not with metal sticks.
There is absolutely no reason to think that Law could slice an opponent in half with anything other than a bladed weapon. Not once has he ever used his fingers to do it. This is because his Room is meant to be his operating theatre, where he the surgeon. Have you ever heard of a surgeon performing an amputation or dissection with anything blunt? No, he needs to use a blade. And that then leads us back to, why use a sword and not a scalpel? Because he’s a swordsman, and that’s the weapon he fights best with.
They’re both much less effective without their swords, that’s all that matters.
And I thought a scythe was basically the same thing as a sword, so why is Zoro now so heavily nerfed?
A completely vital part of fighting.
And also for attacking, as much as you want to pretend otherwise.
Scan, Injection Shot, Radio Knife, Sterbern...
Marvellous. Zoro is also now completely as powerful with a metal stick. Basically a sword, you know. Same motions to block, defend, deliver attacks.
He wouldn’t be able to cut anything with a metal stick. The keyword there is ”cut”, it needs a blade.
And this still ignores the fact that a fight is about more than just landing attacks. Yeah, if everyone just stood still and let Law land Gamma Knife on them he could win without his sword. Thing is, fights don’t work like that.
When will you get that what is relevant is what Law actually does, not what your fanfiction version of him.
“Slice“ shows that it is a cut. Cutting is done with a sharp weapon, not with metal sticks.
There is absolutely no reason to think that Law could slice an opponent in half with anything other than a bladed weapon. Not once has he ever used his fingers to do it. This is because his Room is meant to be his operating theatre, where he the surgeon. Have you ever heard of a surgeon performing an amputation or dissection with anything blunt? No, he needs to use a blade. And that then leads us back to, why use a sword and not a scalpel? Because he’s a swordsman, and that’s the weapon he fights best with.
They’re both much less effective without their swords, that’s all that matters.
Stop jumping to the next question. The question was, can Law cut without his sword, yes or no? If you say no, "because he always used a sword for that", it means that Fujitora's DF does not work without a sword for that exact same reason - because he always activates his DF with a sword.
So, can Law cut without his sword, yes or no, using an argument other than "because he uses a sword"? If no, what's the reason, given his cutting his hax from his DF?
An ability from his DF, nothing to do with the sword. Unless you say Fujitora can use his gravity only with the sword, because he does so.
So, can Law cut without his sword, yes or no, using an argument other than "because he uses a sword"? If no, what's the reason, given his cutting his hax from his DF?
An ability from his DF, nothing to do with the sword. Unless you say Fujitora can use his gravity only with the sword, because he does so.
Dodging the question, great.
Let's ask again and again, until you answer the question: Does Fujitora's gravity fruit only work when Fujitora uses his sword, given he always uses it when using DF powers, even when pulling down meteors? Yes or no? If no, why do you assume that Law cannot cut without his sword when using his spatial hax within his room?
Let's ask again and again, until you answer the question: Does Fujitora's gravity fruit only work when Fujitora uses his sword, given he always uses it when using DF powers, even when pulling down meteors? Yes or no? If no, why do you assume that Law cannot cut without his sword when using his spatial hax within his room?
We all know "Gravity Spoon" is a forbidden technique because it is just too powerful for the one piece world. Fujitora nerfed all of his universe-busting spoon techniques by using a sword instead
Law with his df and his sword vs Law with his df and no sword. Who wins? @comrade
Post automatically merged:
Law with his df and his sword vs Law with his df and no sword. Who wins? @comrade
Last edited:
There's no sensible reason for characterizing Fuji as a man incapable of using gravity without the aid of a sword or even any kind of supportative object. His devil fruit allows him to affect gravity, his ability is not connected to the sword, but his own body, so his arms for example. The sword could act as a balancer, but nothing more overall.