Powers & Abilities So Zoro can counter DJ now

Doggo

Talent is something you make bloom.
Still irrelevant since one is based on the other.
Oda writes the story and draws it, everything else is an interpretation and adaptation of that. Whatever Oda can or cant do is irrelevant, what he does is relevant.
He has no influence on the story of movies, he bas no hand in the anime.
What you are saying is factually wrong, read up the definition of canon.
What you are referring to is if a source material gets adaptations in different mediums ( quite often for light novels for example, witb anime and manga adaptation) or if the writer of a source material is actively involved as showrunner or even head writer of an adaptation, Oda has nothing to do with the anime, as he himself pointed out several times.
If Oda dies, and Shueisha, who owns the rights to One Piece, decideds to hire, I dont know, someone else whatever to finish the story.
Is the rest of the story "canon" or not?
 

Doggo

Talent is something you make bloom.
Depends on how detailed of a summary Oda gave them, but strictly no.
Then, my friend, you have a subjective conception that only what comes from Oda's head can be considered "canon".
Unless you know what's in Oda's contract with Shueisha, based on the "status quo", the property of One Piece manga belongs to Shueisha. Oda, being the creator, gets compensated. But there should be legal barriers that stop him from simply deciding one day to say "fuck it, I'm gonna take One Piece out of here and go publish it somewhere else".
You can't even say that EVERYTHING in One Piece is "Oda's idea", considering that is possible he took advices or changed things in the story, influenced by someone else's idea or suggestion.
If Oda were to die, or be incapacited to continue his work anymore by other means, and Shueisha keeps publishing it and stating "this is oficially One Piece material", you can say "But I dont CONSIDER it canon".
Because "Canon" is a subjective matter, that's why disregarding other media is wrong. It may not be relevant to you, but it is to someone else, and they have as much entitle to their tastes, as you have to yours.
 
Then, my friend, you have a subjective conception that only what comes from Oda's head can be considered "canon".
Unless you know what's in Oda's contract with Shueisha, based on the "status quo", the property of One Piece manga belongs to Shueisha. Oda, being the creator, gets compensated. But there should be legal barriers that stop him from simply deciding one day to say "fuck it, I'm gonna take One Piece out of here and go publish it somewhere else".
You can't even say that EVERYTHING in One Piece is "Oda's idea", considering that is possible he took advices or changed things in the story, influenced by someone else's idea or suggestion.
If Oda were to die, or be incapacited to continue his work anymore by other means, and Shueisha keeps publishing it and stating "this is oficially One Piece material", you can say "But I dont CONSIDER it canon".
Because "Canon" is a subjective matter, that's why disregarding other media is wrong. It may not be relevant to you, but it is to someone else, and they have as much entitle to their tastes, as you have to yours.
Rights do not matter, creator matters, once again bringing up something irrelevant.
You are literally talking about business matters, i am talking about the creative source.

Everything in One Piece is something Oda decided on. How his process is, how much input and feedback he considers, how much inspiration he takes from something else, does all not matter, he is the creator, it´s that simple.

It´s not, there is a definition, hence why i said, look up the definition. The word itself comes from two distinct contexts, one is the Bible, and only taking certain scriptures as canon since others were added later, and also Sherlock Holmes, once again distinguishing everything written by Arthur Coyle himself to be canon, and every novel and adventure written by other writers afterwards as not.
This is not a matter of opinion or subjectivity.
Of course you can spin your own impression in your mind, does not change the fact that it is not intended to be like that.

Most of the time, the creators can extent canonity to other mediums with their license if they so want to, George Lucas gave some employees of Lucasfilm back in the day canonity license so to speak, so they are on the same level as him.

And while Oda stated the anime team does a good job, he never extended such courtesy to the team behind it, and explicitly disconnected the manga from the anime.
 
F

Formerly Seth

I mean Katakuri couldn’t see why pudding had a shut down in the wedding despite being able to see and hear an entire conversation a few chapters prior
I just always thought about something like hiding ur presence via CoO to be some next-level top shit CoO feat and I doubt Sanji has CoO on the highest level.
 
Still irrelevant since one is based on the other.
Oda writes the story and draws it, everything else is an interpretation and adaptation of that. Whatever Oda can or cant do is irrelevant, what he does is relevant.
He has no influence on the story of movies, he bas no hand in the anime.
What you are saying is factually wrong, read up the definition of canon.
What you are referring to is if a source material gets adaptations in different mediums ( quite often for light novels for example, witb anime and manga adaptation) or if the writer of a source material is actively involved as showrunner or even head writer of an adaptation, Oda has nothing to do with the anime, as he himself pointed out several times.

Oda literally made one movie by himself but stay lying.
 
Current Zoro huh... that's tough
Sanji better turn invisible and hide or Zoro will hunt for them legs.
Went to Germa begging to have a new set of legs just to be cut again...truly Judge's son:josad:
Grandmaster Zoro the leg hunter:zosmug::myman:
 
Last edited:
Top