Recent content by Photon

I myself never actually read the scientific paper in detail. But i remember it vividly i read it first from an article that quoted a saying from a Nobel Prize winner. I just did some quick research and i found out it's Ilya Prigogine, who won the Nobel Prize in chemistry twice. This is also...

Scientific papers will indeed be presented, i never claimed the opposite. But the first impression they give is most of the time limited to the abstract and the conclusion; unless you ask them for more details. You're also still ignoring about the fact that the forum has a good scientific...

You and he literally said science and religion DIRECTLY goes against each other. How come something be like that when it is still a controversial debate retard, are you backtracking now

I cited one reference that talked about web of life model. And i already adressed what web of life model mean. If branches stem from only on node/ancestor, that would not be called a "web" And the vocal point is that UCA is becoming more problematic, thus mistakingly taking it as if it is a...

Already adressed, and youre still deaf. Not that they straight up thinking of that. But they do imply possibility that might not be necessarily true, especially for the web of life mode. Exactly lmao,

You disagree when the evolutionists think otherwise lmao

Before 2010s, UCA is done qualitatively based on similartiy of DNA, morphology, fetus, etc. Professor Theobald started the first quantitative study about the reliability of UCA model using computational statistics. He did find that the probability of the UCA model being true is 10^2860 more...

You being deaf and disingeneously misinterpretating my points is a proof youre an atheist not because of genuine reason, but because of other motive As i said, these evolutionists, some of which are atheists said it remains controversial. They are scientific atheists because of genuine reasons...

thats why i said "self-claimed", youre so dense lmao. You didnt explicitly claim that, but your attitude does. Yea keep being deaf Evolutionists: It's still an open debate and remains controversial between the web of life and tree of life model Web of Life Model: every node can have a...

I also read that, difference being you're misinterpretating my point when my actual point is the fact that the UCA model is becoming more problematic, not specifically the model hypotheses proposed by the author. You can google that what scientific athesits mean, but they share a common...

usual concession by retarded self claimed scientific atheists that actually knows nothing about it

I did read that, youre just a moron Why are you quoting something that i already answered above. Theobald himself said it's still an open debate and remains controversial after that study of his. I also answered why this is the case supported by studies done by chinese and japanese biologists...

So now you're saying that these well-known biologists produce not-scientific papers lmao. One of them even has a h-index of over 80, when 60 is already considered exceptional. One of them is also a top 2% scientist. It's not something whether it supports not every mammal share the same common...

Lmao, now youre giving these commom diehard creationists people vibe by saying human evolved from primates. Not only that, but youre saying this is fact as well. Are you really a doctor lmfao There is a reason why the scientist, Professor Theobald, that started the trend to apply formal...

I dont necessarily think a few exceptions disprove the idea. But yeah, UCA mainly relies on qualitative data. Scientists now have started proving UCA with statistical method thanks to the advancement of computer. They did find that there might be really a flaw in UCA model.