Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
I don't believe that's exactly what he means since a lot of that is Zoro fans being taunted and basically goaded into arguing about it. It's kind of forcing them to defend themselves by making fun of them saying their fave is a pedophile (not saying they're innocent since they also do that to other fandoms sometimes). A better example would be if you said Zoro is a boring and basic character and/or a weakling and I started calling you a homeless loser out of nowhere.
A lot of huge fanatics for a specific character will use extreme personal insults the moment you criticize their faves.
A lot of huge fanatics for a specific character will use extreme personal insults the moment you criticize their faves.
Personally idc, Zoro is Zoro. That Mangaka made his choice, if he served his jail time, then so be it as well. But if he relapses...
This is the karma they put on themselves by labeling Sanji fans as such etc.
I think it's going overboard, maybe poking a little fun, but to completely debase them? That's pushing boundaries.
Post automatically merged:
This is the karma they put on themselves by labeling Sanji fans as such etc.
I think it's going overboard, maybe poking a little fun, but to completely debase them? That's pushing boundaries.
True!
People seek path of least resistance and convenience offers that.
Actions or inactions are driven by what serves people or what's comfortable or profitable for them and not by what's right or wrong.
In simple terms, this is moral rationalization. People choices or interests shape what's right or wrong.
People seek path of least resistance and convenience offers that.
Actions or inactions are driven by what serves people or what's comfortable or profitable for them and not by what's right or wrong.
In simple terms, this is moral rationalization. People choices or interests shape what's right or wrong.
And your credibility is entirely dependent on whether or not something agrees with you. They're so courteous and respectful, calling you smart when say things they agree with. The instant you say something they disagree with, it's always you who's wrong and gotta change. They don't even bother to rethink our often subjective beliefs. They were using you to seek validation the entire time. Those who don't conform get filtered out, and you end up with echo chambers like Reddit.
Yes! You are absolutely right.
People have their own sets of beliefs and opinions. These thoughts are often shaped by their needs or circumstances. Over the course of time, these thoughts become so wired in mind that any contrasting opinion seem as a threat to identity or inner peace.
Conflicting opinions distrub that inner emotional core of people.
Irritability, insults or anger - most of the time are defensive mechanisms to protect that same belief or inner peace and dismiss other people opinions.
And, that's why people don't seek "learning" because this would require cross - examination of one's own thoughts and opinions and open oneself to uncomfortability....
What people seek is "affirmation" of their beliefs because this is convenient - this is comfortable.
If you give them affirmation, they will see you as right person or even the person who understands them the most. They will feel connection
If you don't, then you would become most unreasonable or they will feel disconnection.
People often confuse "affirmation as truth and validation as respect and disagreement as challenge to one's own identity "
People have their own sets of beliefs and opinions. These thoughts are often shaped by their needs or circumstances. Over the course of time, these thoughts become so wired in mind that any contrasting opinion seem as a threat to identity or inner peace.
Conflicting opinions distrub that inner emotional core of people.
Irritability, insults or anger - most of the time are defensive mechanisms to protect that same belief or inner peace and dismiss other people opinions.
And, that's why people don't seek "learning" because this would require cross - examination of one's own thoughts and opinions and open oneself to uncomfortability....
What people seek is "affirmation" of their beliefs because this is convenient - this is comfortable.
If you give them affirmation, they will see you as right person or even the person who understands them the most. They will feel connection
If you don't, then you would become most unreasonable or they will feel disconnection.
People often confuse "affirmation as truth and validation as respect and disagreement as challenge to one's own identity "
Post automatically merged:
I am your future
Yes! You are absolutely right.
People have their own sets of beliefs and opinions. These thoughts are often shaped by their needs or circumstances. Over the course of time, these thoughts become so wired in mind that any contrasting opinion seem as a threat to identity or inner peace.
Conflicting opinions distrub that inner emotional core of people.
Irritability, insults or anger - most of the time are defensive mechanisms to protect that same belief or inner peace and dismiss other people opinions.
And, that's why people don't seek "learning" because this would require cross - examination of one's own thoughts and opinions and open oneself to uncomfortability....
What people seek is "affirmation" of their beliefs because this is convenient - this is comfortable.
If you give them affirmation, they will see you as right person or even the person who understands them the most. They will feel connection
If you don't, then you would become most unreasonable or they will feel disconnection.
People often confuse "affirmation as truth and validation as respect and disagreement as challenge to one's own identity "
People have their own sets of beliefs and opinions. These thoughts are often shaped by their needs or circumstances. Over the course of time, these thoughts become so wired in mind that any contrasting opinion seem as a threat to identity or inner peace.
Conflicting opinions distrub that inner emotional core of people.
Irritability, insults or anger - most of the time are defensive mechanisms to protect that same belief or inner peace and dismiss other people opinions.
And, that's why people don't seek "learning" because this would require cross - examination of one's own thoughts and opinions and open oneself to uncomfortability....
What people seek is "affirmation" of their beliefs because this is convenient - this is comfortable.
If you give them affirmation, they will see you as right person or even the person who understands them the most. They will feel connection
If you don't, then you would become most unreasonable or they will feel disconnection.
People often confuse "affirmation as truth and validation as respect and disagreement as challenge to one's own identity "
Post automatically merged:
I am your future
