Wiat, late me ask you again, I'm not sure I understood correctly here. You agree with the ideas of capitals (economical/cultural/social) and the fact that they help people gain status and "success" in their lives ?
The nature of the statement itself is not racist. Perhaps if he said segregation was good but that not what he said
He is going based off the fact that blacks at the time
1.) No government-created drug epidemics that plague black neighborhoods today
2.) Significantly less crime, divorce and other problems
Like always you are against free of speech. And logic. If you were to take your words seriously Europe shouldn't open border to receive refugees of a war zone in another country because that's another country policy and Europe should keep it's nose itself.
Agreed. The real problem is lack of justice. People commits crimes and just because they are foreigns they don't face consequences. That's the real problem. Not illegal immigration.
I did a project in high school about protectionism as an economic policy; according to pretty much all available data and studies, a country that decides to stop trading with others or outsourcing labor to same generally falls into a depression/recession very quickly…but at least the brilliant businessman who ran casinos into the ground and couldn’t sell steaks to the meat-and-potatoes lemmings who are now his biggest supporters thinks it’s a good idea, and who are we to doubt him with such a stellar track record??
I'm not an historian. Neither are you, so listen to scientists instead of youtubers who are promissing you to rediscover the complete untold truth of history
Real historical demonstration is to actively live that.
Later.
Except it is all caused by Hamas
Post automatically merged:
No. I don't need your reply.
Post automatically merged:
Isn't that related to general population as well?
And he still is. Trump says some shits every now and then but he spoke good at UN.
Because he is fucking right. Europeans are with him. And he is currently the most powerful man of the world. Not much one can do.
Like always you are against free of speech. And logic. If you were to take your words seriously Europe shouldn't open border to receive refugees of a war zone in another country because that's another country policy and Europe should keep it's nose itself.
Hypocrisy at it finest.
Agreed. The real problem is lack of justice. People commits crimes and just because they are foreigns they don't face consequences. That's the real problem. Not illegal immigration.
And it is. Not renewable energy itself. But the policy against fossil fuels.
I totally agree about stop trading shit but I really wanna see the data about outsourcing.
Left is losing in Europe. Fascism and genocide will be over as soon the right takes them out. Don't you worry.
USA alone can't do shit anymore. We have seen how Asia cucked him on his face and he did nothing but to go to tweet and cry.
If anything, he's making once a mighty nation take a nose dive at global stage
And, free speech? Sure but he has habit of dictating terms. That's not free speech - that's authoritarian approach to get things done.
You can simp for his illogical actions but he's pathetic and he's making America look pathetic (if you ever care to notice by popping your head out of GPT to see what's happening in the world)
And, it was USA who played role in destabilizing Middle East and North Africa. Europe though went overboard with taking refugees but they still showed some humanity.
And, you are comparing that with Trump dictating terms to EU to back out from Palestine support and close the border?. lmao
Let's be honest. The only reason why I fight against people is VERY simple:
- Most people here are idealistic (as in opposition to historical materialists)
> Which prevents them from understanding or accepting the 90% of what I'm actually saying (except for Blax who, for some reasons, shortcircuited radical leftism with religion without even being materialist)
- Most people here consider social sciences as legit sciences
> Which prevents people from accepting what I say as basic factual rethoric.
White supremacy is a domination system that derives from systemic racism and capitalism that considers that white people are in everyway superior to racialized groups of population.
White supremacy creates a system called "whiteness", which is a non verbal social contract that will basically say that no matter the social class under capitalism, a non racialized person will have a superior social status than a racialized one. Which in return pushes racialized people to seek the acceptations on society (for ex, Fanon explains how subjegated people under colonization where systematically pushed to adopt the colonist mindset to be assimilated by the metropole and extract themselves from the oppression of colonist and imperialism as a whole.
BEing against DEI means refusing the factual observation that white supremacy and therefore systemic racism are the social backbone of western society. It's an invisibilization of a domination system and by consequences a perpetuation of oppression as... if we treat oppressed and non oppressed people the same way, people who don't live oppression will ALWAYS be favorized by the system.
DEI is meant to return equity. Badly in the case of america, but it's still a necessity.
It's no "me". It's a scientific affirmation based on two centuries of observation and researches.
Your vision of racism is idealist. This means that Racism is just a result of bad behavior. But that's not how social structure work in reality. My approach in materialist. It takes systems of domination into account.
I don't have to. His words are public, you have to search for them. It's you who has to prove that he was a good guy, not the other way around.
His rethoric is racist, sexist, homophobic, and he cheered for a genocide. So the guy was a fascist.
Yeah. WHile explaining that the bible says that gay should be stoned to death. Fuck him.
Friendship requieres the knowledge of the oppression that your friends are facing. In the case of gay people it's heteronormativity and patriarchy, in the case of brown people it's systemic racism.
This guy (and you) have no knowledge about this and are defending racist point of view, therefore no matter how many black or gay friends you have or him, you are still participating in their oppression.
HE was not race blind, he was a white supremacist. And fascism is a spectrum it's not 1 or 0, and this guy was a fascist. Stop defending this piece of turd.
Yes it is. Indirectly and sometimes directly.
But to understand - AGAIN - you need to look at how social sciences picture meritocracy and domination systems such as racism
Do you realize you’re creating greatness every time you write these posts, or does it just come naturally?
I’m guessing it’s the latter. I doubt Inspectah Deck knew during Triumph, or Da Vinci while sketching the Mona Lisa, or Tom Brady in the middle of the 28–3 comeback.
But by God we still talk about them, and we will be about your political posts for a long time
Lol yeah no. Charlie Kirk was definitely a racist, mostly towards Muslims. "24 years ago a group of Muslims killed 2,753 people on 9/11. Now a Muslim socialist is on pace to run New York City" was a tweet of his back in June, and perfectly showcases his racism. He had plenty of podcasts denouncing Islam and calling them dangerous, and generalizing brown people as muslim. He also supported the Gaza genocide because eliminating radical Muslims was the top priority.
Kirk was just your textbook Christian Nationalist, with all of his beliefs and politics stemming from his glorified/propagandized version of the Bible like the rest.
Do you realize you’re creating greatness every time you write these posts, or does it just come naturally?
I’m guessing it’s the latter. I doubt Inspectah Deck knew during Triumph, or Da Vinci while sketching the Mona Lisa, or Tom Brady in the middle of the 28–3 comeback.
But by God we still talk about them, and we will be about your political posts for a long time
Fun fact, people I know keep telling me that in french, they love to read what I say because they are persuaded that I have some form of writing gift (even tho I make a lot of grammar mistakes). And I can't even begin to accept the compliment because I'm being constantly mocked here lmao
I know nothing about Kirk outside of what I read here the last week, so I won't judge, but I watched some parts of his memorial, and that shit was creepy as fuck. People coming out to pyro like they're Batista from Smackdown in 2006?!!
Also, his wife gives me the creeps. The least genuine reaction of grief I ever saw from a public figure. If I was a conspiracy theorist, I'd follow that trail
Post automatically merged:
Like damn sis, your husband's corpse is still warm and you're out here sending marketing blast emails?! Sus af
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.