CoC: Color of Clowns

Whacky Arm Waving Inflatable Imu-chan
https://www.reddit.com/r/Anticonsumption/comments/1op05xc/_/nn8fqse
"It tells you something how much of the rich/right wing filed in behind Cuomo after he stood as an independent. The Democratic Party leans so much further to the right than the left that if you take away the (D) after someone’s name, the republicans will support them against a candidate actually on the left."
 
I ask one simple thing. Something that a 13 year old can do and no one is able to do it. And you guyz are asking me to be reasonnable...

A) a i is unreliable

B) I'm not a man🤣🤣🤣 at least not in the biological sense
Yes, but it's reliable enough for what I'm asking here and noted.


I can understand why women might have an issue with men, just like I can understand why someone might be racist

doesnt mean id agree with their generalizations lol
Did you ask the AI what I asked you to ask? I don't have enough room to make a full size explanation here.


Some people, thankfully mostly people who are online, seem to believe that it's fine that little boys get molested and manipulated by the women in their life. Because "men are born evil". Like I said before this is just bioessentialism.
It's either that or "Bro you're so lucky that a hot woman slept with you!" ignoring the age gap and/or lack of consent plus the incest (if it's incestuous, although there are cases like teachers molesting kids but ykwim)
You won't hear leftists say that. And I guess you ignored what I told you.. as always.
Sigh.. You can't ask for explanation and just have this bad faith attitude mate.


You just summed up why populism works
The purpose of this is to raise questions. For people to ask "why are they saying this"?
 
I ask one simple thing. Something that a 13 year old can do and no one is able to do it. And you guyz are asking me to be reasonnable...


Yes, but it's reliable enough for what I'm asking here and noted.



Did you ask the AI what I asked you to ask? I don't have enough room to make a full size explanation here.



You won't hear leftists say that. And I guess you ignored what I told you.. as always.
Sigh.. You can't ask for explanation and just have this bad faith attitude mate.



The purpose of this is to raise questions. For people to ask "why are they saying this"?
Unlike you I don’t need AI to make reasonable conclusions and frankly I rather avoid using such tool
 
Yes, but it's reliable enough for what I'm asking here and noted.
In the old days people used to say 'Google is your friend', there even was a site letmegooglethatforyou.com that would provide instant results.
Society really fell off.

The purpose of this is to raise questions. For people to ask "why are they saying this"?
The purpose of "deport all foreigners" is for people to ask "why are they saying this"?
 
Unlike you I don’t need AI to make reasonable conclusions and frankly I rather avoid using such tool
I sadly can't seem to be able to dumb down my reasoning enough for you to understand my point, so I'm forced to send you to an AI because it's baby proof in that domain. But if you can't use an AI which is fair, I don't like them either, there is no way for you to understand this concept as I won't go over three lines and make you a big paragraph to explain something as basic as systemization.


In the old days people used to say 'Google is your friend', there even was a site letmegooglethatforyou.com that would provide instant results.
Society really fell off.
Well.. yeah basically. If a thousand of simple explanations here are not enough, I can't help. I literally tried every method and I don't want to talk to you like you are 8 years old. So we are in a bit of a pickle.


The purpose of "deport all foreigners" is for people to ask "why are they saying this"?
You really have the worst and ignorant comparisons lmao. You are completely forgetting the dynamics of power. But as I said, it's useless to explain something when you are not able to understand it. Or maybe I should start REALLY dumbing my rethoric down in order for you people to understand.
 
I sadly can't seem to be able to dumb down my reasoning enough for you to understand my point, so I'm forced to send you to an AI because it's baby proof in that domain. But if you can't use an AI which is fair, I don't like them either, there is no way for you to understand this concept as I won't go over three lines and make you a big paragraph to explain something as basic as systemization.



Well.. yeah basically. If a thousand of simple explanations here are not enough, I can't help. I literally tried every method and I don't want to talk to you like you are 8 years old. So we are in a bit of a pickle.



You really have the worst and ignorant comparisons lmao. You are completely forgetting the dynamics of power. But as I said, it's useless to explain something when you are not able to understand it. Or maybe I should start REALLY dumbing my rethoric down in order for you people to understand.
Reversing or replacing the subject of the sentence is an intellectual exercise that helps you understand what tf you even said.
 
Yeah. It's actually pretty basic stuff. But your reject of both of these is showing that you do not understand - even after me explaining these concepts to you - what both of these means. OR that you do understand but you do not agree, which is even worse and would be a testimony of your rightist alignment.
I mean, acab is inherently a generalization fallacy.
:kayneshrug:
Post automatically merged:

Go to your local AI overlord
Ai overlord agrees that one can be racist towards white people
Post automatically merged:

at least not in the biological sense
Alien?
 
Last edited:
I mean, acab is inherently a generalization fallacy.
:kayneshrug:
Nop. As I explained, words have significations. If you strip the sociological context of a word, you can strip it of its essence. In this case, by stripping the contextual informations of "Acab", you are yourself doing the fallacy by reducing the argument to a fallacious blank strawman argumentation. Talk about Acab in its systemic sense or do not.

Ai overlord agrees that one can be racist towards white people
Lmao Did you caliber yours to talked to you like a 10 yo?
 
Lmao Did you caliber yours to talked to you like a 10 yo?
Nope, it just gets how language works and you do not.
Post automatically merged:

Nop. As I explained, words have significations. If you strip the sociological context of a word, you can strip it of its essence. In this case, by stripping the contextual informations of "Acab", you are yourself doing the fallacy by reducing the argument to a fallacious blank strawman argumentation. Talk about Acab in its systemic sense or do not.
Acab stands for all cops are bastards.
If the message you want to convey is "the structure of our society fosters a climate that enables violence among the executive" then find an acronym for it.
Until then acab still means ALL cops are bastards.
:zosleepy:
 
Go back to sleep. If you are not willing to be open minded, don't talk to an anticapitalist.
well what my point (and bisoromis) was is that it doesnt really matter what you want to imply using a slogan, the slogan itself at face value is generalizing a huge portion of the population, and that is fallacious.

and i dont feel like you have adressed bisoromis point at all so far, thats why i repeated it.
 
well what my point (and bisoromis) was is that it doesnt really matter what you want to imply using a slogan, the slogan itself at face value is generalizing a huge portion of the population, and that is fallacious.

and i dont feel like you have adressed bisoromis point at all so far, thats why i repeated it.
That's the point. These slogan are meant to create conflict, to alienate & raise questions. It's also a way to sort people who are willing to listen to feminists/anticapitalist and those who are not. Like you, I was disagreeing at first strongly, I even said multiple times to feminist and activist to their faces that they were hurting their own cause.. then... because I'm curious, I listened more closely and understood.
 
Top