Powers & Abilities How Shanks Beat Loki

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
#22
Bro Loki had to eat the fruit for a reason lol
OK?

The last panel of their fight we see is Loki in his Zoan form gripping Harald's head, and right after that, Harald immediately snaps back to reality and lets Loki kill him.
There was literally 4 more panels after that head grab showing time passing. Loki was clean in one of the of those panels, and was now gassed out and bleeding in the next 3 panels.

It's either Loki undid the possession with Haki, or undid it with the fruit's hax.
If it was the fruit, then it was match up thing.

Also can people stop parroting "saving" Harald headcanon already, Loki did not talk no jutsu him. He beat the shit outta him then killed him. Where is the saving?
? When did someone say that?
 
#24
Both Kizaru and Gaban calls Luffy the man defeated Kaido yet many in this fandom would argue Luffy is still weaker than him or that it wasn't a 1 vs 1 because Kaido went through a gauntlet and Luffy got to restore his stamina by eating food mid battle.



Mind you neither Gaban or Jarul explictly stated Shanks defeated Loki, but that he captured him (which can mean it happened after a defeat in a duel but not only)
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
#25
Loki still had to get to the point where he could use the fruit's hax to remove the curse, then, and that's the thing.
If he weren't strong enough he'd have died the moment Harald attacked him after getting the fruit. Instead he managed to overwhelm Harald in combat, transform, then subdue him in his Zoan form.
? Is someone arguing that Loki should've been destroyed by Harald? What is the point of mentioning that?

Shanks, Gaban, and Loki all overwhelmed Harald at first. All 3 were seen bleeding and gassed out after some time passed because of Harald's COC and regen.

Loki succeeded not because he was that strong, but because Harald came back to senses and let himself be killed. If that was because of Loki's DF, then it isnt a testament for Loki being that powerful, but him having the right ability for the right situation.

Everything says Loki is a top tier that Luffy can take down.
 
#28
? Is someone arguing that Loki should've been destroyed by Harald? What is the point of mentioning that?

Shanks, Gaban, and Loki all overwhelmed Harald at first. All 3 were seen bleeding and gassed out after some time passed because of Harald's COC and regen.

Loki succeeded not because he was that strong, but because Harald came back to senses and let himself be killed. If that was because of Loki's DF, then it isnt a testament for Loki being that powerful, but him having the right ability for the right situation.

Everything says Loki is a top tier that Luffy can take down.
Shanks and Gaban never overwhelmed an on-guard Harald. They only caught him once when he wasn’t paying attention. Later on, Gaban outright implies that they can’t stop Harald once he starts using his own aCoC.

Loki, on the other hand, completely dominated an on-guard Harald in a straight 1v1. The fruit gives Loki overwhelming power (world-destroying reputation), and that was necessary to overpower an amped Harald. That was the entire narrative Oda kept hammering home. It doesn’t have some secret mechanic that bypasses Imu’s regeneration. We already know the answer to that is potent aCoC. The difference is simply that Gaban, Shanks, and the guards combined couldn’t overpower or stop Harald the way Loki could.
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
#31
Shanks and Gaban never overwhelmed an on-guard Harald. They only caught him once when he wasn’t paying attention. Later on, Gaban outright implies that they can’t stop Harald once he starts using his own aCoC.

Loki, on the other hand, completely dominated an on-guard Harald in a straight 1v1. The fruit gives Loki overwhelming power (world-destroying reputation), and that was necessary to overpower an amped Harald. That was the entire narrative Oda kept hammering home. It doesn’t have some secret mechanic that bypasses Imu’s regeneration. We already know the answer to that is potent aCoC. The difference is simply that Gaban, Shanks, and the guards combined couldn’t overpower or stop Harald the way Loki could.
How does any of this mean that Luffy doesn't have the strength to stop Loki or that Shanks must have used tricks or help? That has always been my point and the reason for the whole convo. Being stronger than Gaban and that version of Shanks ≠ being stronger than or unable to be beaten by Luffy or that Shanks guaranteed used foul play.

Gaban and Shanks easily dodged Harald, and yes Gaban and Shanks complained about Harald having COC and the fight not ending. Their attacks wasn't doing the job and Harald eventually got them because of the regen. It was the same for Loki who at first was knocking Harald around but was later huffing and bleeding. Harald was getting him too, and Loki won because Harald came back to his senses.

So Gaban and Shanks simply lacked the ACOC potency to stop Harald's regen, while Loki's was blatantly implied to be enough. Even with that, Loki still struggled and got a great opening.
 

Dickie D. Dick

SII - Sakazuki Incinerate Imu
#33
How does any of this mean that Luffy doesn't have the strength to stop Loki or that Shanks must have used tricks or help? That has always been my point and the reason for the whole convo. Being stronger than Gaban and that version of Shanks ≠ being stronger than or unable to be beaten by Luffy or that Shanks guaranteed used foul play.

Gaban and Shanks easily dodged Harald, and yes Gaban and Shanks complained about Harald having COC and the fight not ending. Their attacks wasn't doing the job and Harald eventually got them because of the regen. It was the same for Loki who at first was knocking Harald around but was later huffing and bleeding. Harald was getting him too, and Loki won because Harald came back to his senses.

So Gaban and Shanks simply lacked the ACOC potency to stop Harald's regen, while Loki's was blatantly implied to be enough. Even with that, Loki still struggled and got a great opening.
Luffy can maybe defeated wounded (nerf) Loki but full health Loki negs the condom.
Saint Squeak is a a dirty rat and a Bozosei agent.
 
#35
How does any of this mean that Luffy doesn't have the strength to stop Loki or that Shanks must have used tricks or help? That has always been my point and the reason for the whole convo. Being stronger than Gaban and that version of Shanks ≠ being stronger than or unable to be beaten by Luffy or that Shanks guaranteed used foul play.

Gaban and Shanks easily dodged Harald, and yes Gaban and Shanks complained about Harald having COC and the fight not ending. Their attacks wasn't doing the job and Harald eventually got them because of the regen. It was the same for Loki who at first was knocking Harald around but was later huffing and bleeding. Harald was getting him too, and Loki won because Harald came back to his senses.

So Gaban and Shanks simply lacked the ACOC potency to stop Harald's regen, while Loki's was blatantly implied to be enough. Even with that, Loki still struggled and got a great opening.
The core issue is that a transformed Loki completely dominated an amped Harald. This is a character who, by narrative implication, stands above the likes of Xebec, Prime Whitebeard, and Roger.

I can genuinely say with confidence that Loki has already surpassed both Xebec and Harald. That’s what the narrative keeps pushing. Loki, even before eating the fruit, was able to get past Ragnir, someone Harald was only confident in challenging after receiving his amp. That already establishes Loki as relative to base Harald before gaining the world-destroying fruit. There’s also a panel of Loki clashing evenly with Harald, so there’s nothing in the story that contradicts this interpretation. If Shanks ends up beating Loki outright, then powerscaling genuinely falls apart.

Even Gaban wasn’t confident that Luffy could handle Loki, despite knowing that the same Luffy had already beaten Kaido. On top of that, Loki has been explicitly established as nerfed for months. We might not even see Loki’s full potential until post-Elbaf.
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
#37
The core issue is that a transformed Loki completely dominated an amped Harald. This is a character who, by narrative implication, stands above the likes of Xebec, Prime Whitebeard, and Roger.

I can genuinely say with confidence that Loki has already surpassed both Xebec and Harald. That’s what the narrative keeps pushing. Loki, even before eating the fruit, was able to get past Ragnir, someone Harald was only confident in challenging after receiving his amp. That already establishes Loki as relative to base Harald before gaining the world-destroying fruit. There’s also a panel of Loki clashing evenly with Harald, so there’s nothing in the story that contradicts this interpretation. If Shanks ends up beating Loki outright, then powerscaling genuinely falls apart.

Even Gaban wasn’t confident that Luffy could handle Loki, despite knowing that the same Luffy had already beaten Kaido. On top of that, Loki has been explicitly established as nerfed for months. We might not even see Loki’s full potential until post-Elbaf.
Lemme preface by saying I have no issues with Loki being that dog. My problem is the narrative pushing twice that Luffy has the power to stop Loki like Shanks did. Gaban didn't give Luffy the key until he was able to guage Luffy's strength as being adequate for the task of stopping Loki like Shanks did. Gaban also didn't argue for Loki being free until Luffy said he will just beat up Loki if he goes on a rampage. The narrative puts a glass ceiling over Loki and makes me interpret everything he does within the confines of him under Luffy and Shanks.

Also, one of the reasons Harald wanted Loki to eat the fruit was to guarantee that he himself doesn't get it. And Harald is like Xebec in that they both lost their senses and didn't dodge a thing. And Loki still couldn't stop Harald until he came back to senses.

I also don't buy into any "damage lowers their speed, AP, COC" etc. since that rarely ever happens, and characters move faster and hit harder 99% of the time. It's usually reserved for very specific plot points like Zoro vs Hatchi.
 

ZenZu

The only one who can beat me is me
#38
Lemme preface by saying I have no issues with Loki being that dog. My problem is the narrative pushing twice that Luffy has the power to stop Loki like Shanks did. Gaban didn't give Luffy the key until he was able to guage Luffy's strength as being adequate for the task of stopping Loki like Shanks did. Gaban also didn't argue for Loki being free until Luffy said he will just beat up Loki if he goes on a rampage. The narrative puts a glass ceiling over Loki and makes me interpret everything he does within the confines of him under Luffy and Shanks.

Also, one of the reasons Harald wanted Loki to eat the fruit was to guarantee that he himself doesn't get it. And Harald is like Xebec in that they both lost their senses and didn't dodge a thing. And Loki still couldn't stop Harald until he came back to senses.

I also don't buy into any "damage lowers their speed, AP, COC" etc. since that rarely ever happens, and characters move faster and hit harder 99% of the time. It's usually reserved for very specific plot points like Zoro vs Hatchi.
-Luffy will be portrayed above Loki by the end of the arc in some way.
-Shanks won't look bad
-Both Shanks and Loki will aura farm a bit and the capture will come with an asterisk.

All 3 things will happen. Loki though is a Harald+ lvl threat, that is confirmed.
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
#39
-Luffy will be portrayed above Loki by the end of the arc in some way.
-Shanks won't look bad
-Both Shanks and Loki will aura farm a bit and the capture will come with an asterisk.

All 3 things will happen. Loki though is a Harald+ lvl threat, that is confirmed.
The idea that Loki is a level above Xebec, Harald, Roger, Garp, and WB sounds utterly insane but that's a me problem. I was gonna say Luffy becoming stronger than that in one arc is stupid, but then I remembered Wano and the 5 back-to-back power ups.
 
#40
There is not a single indication that Shanks defeated Loki with underhanded tactics or sth.

and taking Odas glazing for Shanks in to account, why would anyone think otherwise?

I thought this was just slander but some people genuinely believe that Loki is stronger than Shanks lmao
 
Top