Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
What are these solutions ?
Anyway. The current legislation that could go through French Parliament is as follows. Assisted suicide isn't even about handicapped people but very sick people with incurable illness at a serious stage. There are even more requirements to that. It's a very strict procedure and doctors can even refuse to euthanize the person... and as we know doctors are usually conservative so they're likely to refuse.
Needless to bring up the nazis when the legislation on debate at the Senate includes "to make a free and informed request" from the very sick person in the requirements. It isn't something that is brought up by the hateful family.
The French law isn't about handicaps.
Lots of religious arguments or same arguments before abortion was legalized are usually brought up.
I hope you're not being swayed by them.
Anyway. The current legislation that could go through French Parliament is as follows. Assisted suicide isn't even about handicapped people but very sick people with incurable illness at a serious stage. There are even more requirements to that. It's a very strict procedure and doctors can even refuse to euthanize the person... and as we know doctors are usually conservative so they're likely to refuse.
Needless to bring up the nazis when the legislation on debate at the Senate includes "to make a free and informed request" from the very sick person in the requirements. It isn't something that is brought up by the hateful family.
The French law isn't about handicaps.
Lots of religious arguments or same arguments before abortion was legalized are usually brought up.
I hope you're not being swayed by them.
Even though I, myself have said many times that Trump is an idiot and not a statesman but this guy is anything but an idiot.
In the same speech, he called him a fantastic man.
Trump often use aggressive and exaggerated statements. This wasn't a dig at MBS but it's more like power signalling.
He likes to exert dominance via statements and come across as strongman.
Saudi won't do anything because Trump is right - they handed over massive leverage to US in past one year.
In the same speech, he called him a fantastic man.
Trump often use aggressive and exaggerated statements. This wasn't a dig at MBS but it's more like power signalling.
He likes to exert dominance via statements and come across as strongman.
Saudi won't do anything because Trump is right - they handed over massive leverage to US in past one year.
I will accept your rethoric through critical thinking tool (like the burden of proof) when you will have proven to me that you are capable of accepting to have a critical thinking driven conversation. In the meantime, I have nothing to prove to you.
Obviously.
No don't worry, we oppose the rconservative activists on this. It's far-far-left activism. Something that most leftist are missing since we are invizibilized by pretty much the entire political spectrum (conservatists are actually recuperating our arguments and twisting them). It's one of the many reason why we have problems with LFI. They jumped into the trap without thinking.
We are only supported by intersextional marxist, anarchist and communist.
To begin, a better access to palliative care. We know that the demand of death is correlated to the lack of accessibility in palliative care. And in our current destroyed healthcare society, it's imperative to create a better access first then to look for the exceptionnal cases and the demand of assisted suicide. Which usually can be helped through a better accesibility of medication.
I'm sending you to this article from an antivalidist collective group in strasbourg who had a discussion with a EELV partisan of a text: https://blogs.mediapart.fr/collecti...-avec-une-deputee-eelv-revele-le-vrai-clivage
It will make you understand the anti-validist pov.
Also there is this video from Elisa Rojas that is a MUST see. (sorry guyz, it's in french)
Then, you absolutely need to look at this video from Leo:
I'll not reply to the rest, the ressources I gave you should help you understand better than I would the problem with the law and the fact that even if disabled people are not the subject, they are central in the problem, ignored and threatenned
Obviously.
No don't worry, we oppose the rconservative activists on this. It's far-far-left activism. Something that most leftist are missing since we are invizibilized by pretty much the entire political spectrum (conservatists are actually recuperating our arguments and twisting them). It's one of the many reason why we have problems with LFI. They jumped into the trap without thinking.
We are only supported by intersextional marxist, anarchist and communist.
To begin, a better access to palliative care. We know that the demand of death is correlated to the lack of accessibility in palliative care. And in our current destroyed healthcare society, it's imperative to create a better access first then to look for the exceptionnal cases and the demand of assisted suicide. Which usually can be helped through a better accesibility of medication.
I'm sending you to this article from an antivalidist collective group in strasbourg who had a discussion with a EELV partisan of a text: https://blogs.mediapart.fr/collecti...-avec-une-deputee-eelv-revele-le-vrai-clivage
It will make you understand the anti-validist pov.
Also there is this video from Elisa Rojas that is a MUST see. (sorry guyz, it's in french)
Then, you absolutely need to look at this video from Leo:
I'll not reply to the rest, the ressources I gave you should help you understand better than I would the problem with the law and the fact that even if disabled people are not the subject, they are central in the problem, ignored and threatenned
You are not giving me information. It is completely irrelevant to what I said about me not growing up hateful despite my experiences. So you need be hateful to understand systemic problems or something?
You are the one that posted the counter argument that I'm trying to be white or adopt white customs for not ended up the way you assume I should've.
You're telling what you assume because you need some explanation that's convenient for your agenda. The amount of times you've been "surprised" by my opinions and self awareness while never doing the same for me is very telling.
You always assume there's some "blockage" that prevents people from agreeing with everything you say.
This is nothing but another attempt by you to find some psychological barrier to explain the great sin of me not agreeing with everything you say. You are the one who linked a psychiatrist that studies white savior mindets as a counter argument to me saying that I didn't become hateful. Learn the basics of debate.
This is irrelevant to my original post though. Saying otherwise means you are trying to be a psychiatrist and knows my mind better than I do despite having no information.
Hey guess what? These scholars arent suggesting a change in defintion. You are the one that are taking their works and going "You know what? The words should mean this instead!" and then hide behind scholars when their works are irrelevant to you using works incorrectly. Other scholars dont give you the excuse to make up your own versions and then expect others to follow. You yourself are not a scientist.
You are the one that posted the counter argument that I'm trying to be white or adopt white customs for not ended up the way you assume I should've.
You're telling what you assume because you need some explanation that's convenient for your agenda. The amount of times you've been "surprised" by my opinions and self awareness while never doing the same for me is very telling.
You always assume there's some "blockage" that prevents people from agreeing with everything you say.
This is nothing but another attempt by you to find some psychological barrier to explain the great sin of me not agreeing with everything you say. You are the one who linked a psychiatrist that studies white savior mindets as a counter argument to me saying that I didn't become hateful. Learn the basics of debate.
This is irrelevant to my original post though. Saying otherwise means you are trying to be a psychiatrist and knows my mind better than I do despite having no information.
Hey guess what? These scholars arent suggesting a change in defintion. You are the one that are taking their works and going "You know what? The words should mean this instead!" and then hide behind scholars when their works are irrelevant to you using works incorrectly. Other scholars dont give you the excuse to make up your own versions and then expect others to follow. You yourself are not a scientist.
Considering the cultural context and, hell, common sense, MBS is between a rock and a hard place now - either risk any face he has and not respond to the Trump line at all (or downplay it) OR respond in line with his position (both real.and self-imagined).
Saying ANY world leader has to kiss your ass is retarded and apolitical to the extreme.
Saying it to your biggest Muslim (and arguably middle eastern, considering the oil deals) ally is beyond brain dead. His cabinet needs to put him on a leash asap if they want to save any face by the end of this term.
Saying ANY world leader has to kiss your ass is retarded and apolitical to the extreme.
Saying it to your biggest Muslim (and arguably middle eastern, considering the oil deals) ally is beyond brain dead. His cabinet needs to put him on a leash asap if they want to save any face by the end of this term.
Thing is they Kant lmao. They’re scared of their own base of supporters and voters. And they know that tha PDF in charge is tha ONLY one they listen to, so if he gives em marching orders they gonna carry that shit out with a smile
Don’t forget that MAGA dude that ran up and killed that Minnesota mayor and her husband and they dog or sum a few months back
Don’t forget that MAGA dude that ran up and killed that Minnesota mayor and her husband and they dog or sum a few months back
I'm sorry but I do not reply to this type of injonction. You don't have a dumb masculinist in front of you, I don't have to come on top and I'm not here to "win" the debate even if I like it, I'm here to share my knowledge. If you stop seeing the debate as a battles like I did at the beginning here, come back to me and we will have a real conversation.
Are you trying to make a 3D chess move here thinking "I surely got him this time, checkmate" ?
Our fight stands in the context of my radical opposition to the police and the system. You imply here that being like I am (and like all racialized antiracist are), is being "hateful" thus equating the action of not being radically against these things as being "non hatefull".
You are literally showing me that your conception of being "non hateful" is - in regards to what you said here already - to be critical of the system but "not too much" like us. Thus proving what I describe. You still protect the system.
So let me answer you : No you don't have to be hateful. I don't hate anyone.
Indeed I'm sometimes surprised.. but that's mostly because I don't contextualize your position. In reality, your position is logical. The real surprise for me is that you know that the world is shit, and you block any entrance to really understand why.
In such context, it's not really a "blockage", it's more a problem of framing. We are looking both at the same picture, but when I'm looking to it from the front, you are looking at it from a 30° angle and you consider that coming at my position is a dumb thing to do and you see the picture better than I am. The problem is ego.
Showing you this was an error in restrospect. Too soon. It's obvious that coming from me, it can only be taken like this.
if you knew how I see psychiatrist... you would laugh at your statement here. No. That's not it.
Maybe one day you will see that there are patterns in society that can be analyzed. It's not about psychiatry, it's about sociology.
Just like you and yet you are adamant on something you don't understand so please, take a second to reflect on your biases.
And ask yourself carefully:
What is your interest in defending the fact that racism can't be directed to white people?
Because you sure are defending that with care right now :)
Right! You are a unique diamant of uniqueness. Your behavior can't be scratched by the horrendus storms of social influences. You are much like a god, intouchable, immuable, absolutely devoided of these social behavior related to patterns that we mere mortals are all experiencing. You are so much more, a single absolutely special ray of wisesness, and I ? I'm the random deluded one but you, in your great uniqueness can't depict obvious and predetermined social interactions that can be predicted and analyzed on the entire planet...
After all, you are above the material and the social. All hail our uniqueness Zenos-Sama, the great unpredictible !!
Are you trying to make a 3D chess move here thinking "I surely got him this time, checkmate" ?
Our fight stands in the context of my radical opposition to the police and the system. You imply here that being like I am (and like all racialized antiracist are), is being "hateful" thus equating the action of not being radically against these things as being "non hatefull".
You are literally showing me that your conception of being "non hateful" is - in regards to what you said here already - to be critical of the system but "not too much" like us. Thus proving what I describe. You still protect the system.
So let me answer you : No you don't have to be hateful. I don't hate anyone.
Indeed I'm sometimes surprised.. but that's mostly because I don't contextualize your position. In reality, your position is logical. The real surprise for me is that you know that the world is shit, and you block any entrance to really understand why.
In such context, it's not really a "blockage", it's more a problem of framing. We are looking both at the same picture, but when I'm looking to it from the front, you are looking at it from a 30° angle and you consider that coming at my position is a dumb thing to do and you see the picture better than I am. The problem is ego.
Showing you this was an error in restrospect. Too soon. It's obvious that coming from me, it can only be taken like this.
if you knew how I see psychiatrist... you would laugh at your statement here. No. That's not it.
Maybe one day you will see that there are patterns in society that can be analyzed. It's not about psychiatry, it's about sociology.
Just like you and yet you are adamant on something you don't understand so please, take a second to reflect on your biases.
And ask yourself carefully:
What is your interest in defending the fact that racism can't be directed to white people?
Because you sure are defending that with care right now :)
Right! You are a unique diamant of uniqueness. Your behavior can't be scratched by the horrendus storms of social influences. You are much like a god, intouchable, immuable, absolutely devoided of these social behavior related to patterns that we mere mortals are all experiencing. You are so much more, a single absolutely special ray of wisesness, and I ? I'm the random deluded one but you, in your great uniqueness can't depict obvious and predetermined social interactions that can be predicted and analyzed on the entire planet...
After all, you are above the material and the social. All hail our uniqueness Zenos-Sama, the great unpredictible !!
@Logiko can't you see how hypocritical can you be when you support Maximalist Leftist Policies on everything except for when it effects you?
Only then do you admit the Cracks in the system
You are hardly any different from MAGA People who support borderline fascism except when it comes to subjects that affect them, then out of nowhere want some Social Democracy and fairness
Only then do you admit the Cracks in the system
You are hardly any different from MAGA People who support borderline fascism except when it comes to subjects that affect them, then out of nowhere want some Social Democracy and fairness