Btw on twitter I have seen some comments about how Sanji tanked Imu's attack. Maybe some of them are ironic but it is fundamentally wrong.
For me "tanking an attack" means receiving an attack and not being largely affected by it. It means that the character after the attack is not being knocked out or does not get huge damages from it.
Given that no, Sanji did not tank that as we can see he is probably knocked out.
Another example is Zoro vs Hakai, he did not tank it. First it was assumed that he was saved by Law after two seconds and so he did not even got hit by the full scale attack of Hakai.
The outcome is that both of them did not tank the attack.
Sanji -> knocked out
Zoro -> severely damaged (several broken bones) and did not even took the full hit.
We even got the demonstration of "tanking an attack" in this chapter specifically.
Imu tanked the hammer attack from Loki using his black flames as a shield and he tanked the thorheim after also using the black flames with the same method.
For me "tanking an attack" means receiving an attack and not being largely affected by it. It means that the character after the attack is not being knocked out or does not get huge damages from it.
Given that no, Sanji did not tank that as we can see he is probably knocked out.
Another example is Zoro vs Hakai, he did not tank it. First it was assumed that he was saved by Law after two seconds and so he did not even got hit by the full scale attack of Hakai.
The outcome is that both of them did not tank the attack.
Sanji -> knocked out
Zoro -> severely damaged (several broken bones) and did not even took the full hit.
We even got the demonstration of "tanking an attack" in this chapter specifically.
Imu tanked the hammer attack from Loki using his black flames as a shield and he tanked the thorheim after also using the black flames with the same method.
Last edited:




