Chapter Discussion Tension oficially died in One Piece

Tension is dead in One Piece?

  • Yes, it is dead

    Votes: 20 83.3%
  • No

    Votes: 4 16.7%

  • Total voters
    24
#21
Yeah... Luffy didn't fight Doflamingo, Moria, or Lucci for 11 hours. This guy dragged Luffy into deep waters and Luffy got by very explicitly because of Nami's help. The tension wasn't in whether or not the very first guy on the island would beat Luffy before he even got a chance to see Sanji, lmao, the tension was that just one of her underlings could take Luffy to the limit right out of the gate and there were hundreds more enemies not including the Vinsmoke family members. Cracker himself was never supposed to be relevant.

As far as offscreen goes, there's absolutely no narrative reason to have shown more of that fight. We're told it was a repetitive hit and run stalemate for half a day, no idea what anyone wanted them to show or why lol
Cuz it’s unrealistic
 
#25
It happened in Whole Cake. When Luffy offscreened Cracker
Oda doesnt know how to write Luffy in post-TS and Final Saga.
The amount of plot armor babysitting him ruins his fights and story overall.
I have been pointing this out since WCI.

He refuses to make him strong enough but insists to make him win, that's a recipe for disaster.
Danger exists but he refuses to put Luffy in such situations.
>As long as I'm alive I have infinite chances... This has made it clear that tension has left the room.

Regarding Imu, he stayed a mystery for too long, he is simply not what people want him to be. The main mystery is still a mystery, in fact we know barely anything about it. It simply doesnt involve Imu.
Imu being harmed by a combo is expected, he was harmed by a mere punch of Luffy before so expecting that he shrugs off a combo is crazy...

Odas obsession with putting Luffy everywhere, even where he doesnt belong and leaving nothing to others, is a reason for this narrative downfall.
Yes, WCI is a right example, But that could be just a mistake. But when a Villain who should know eveyrhing about Noka and i'ts weak sides. Fails to do damage it's over. No one would be able
 

Reborn

Throughout Heaven & Earth,I alone am d Honored One
#28
Yes, WCI is a right example, But that could be just a mistake. But when a Villain who should know eveyrhing about Noka and i'ts weak sides. Fails to do damage it's over. No one would be able
It's nothing like that tbh.

As an IMU fan, you expected IMU to destroy Luffy.

It didn't happen and we got IMU showing more than he was suppose to and took hits.

Thus, for you it became bad writing.


Thing is most people knew this is likely to happen. Infact, we don't even know what IMU is really capable of. All we can be certain of is that this isn't the arc in which IMU is going down and Luffy is nowhere near IMU's level.
 
Last edited:

Reborn

Throughout Heaven & Earth,I alone am d Honored One
#29
I also don't understand why people think death = tensions lmao

Death isn't required to have tensions in the story.

One piece needs SHs to face consequences of their actions which often are careless, and not well planned. Consequences could be anything (not necessarily death) which adds up but there has to be some consequences and not everything turning out to be in favor.

And, oda needs to stop dragging less relevant sub plots and focus more on building mysteries (we have tons of it ) to keep suspense alive.
 
#30
I also don't understand why people think death = tensions lmao

Death isn't required to have tensions in the story.

One piece needs SHs to face consequences of their actions which often are careless, and not well planned. Consequences could be anything (not necessarily death) which adds up but there has to be some consequences and not everything turning out to be in favor.

And, oda needs to stop dragging less relevant sub plots and focus more on building mysteries (we have tons of it ) to keep suspense alive.
2 swords in the chest with life stealing abilities
lmfao what consequences clown
 
#31
It's always been like this. There were cool villains like Crocodile, Lucci, and Doflamingo, who brought tension, and filler villains like Wapol, Hody, and Caesar. Imu is not That Guy, he is weakling, both power-level wise and plotwise.
This is why Oda drags it out until chapter 1200 - to write Imu out of the story and start the final war only between the important characters.
"Imu is the final villain" is like "gear death", but Oda's real plan was always "gear 5" - to clown those who think OP is a story about "chosen one" vs the devil, but OP was and will be a story about pirates, so Teach is the final villain . Just like Usopp(1192) showed that Gaban(1190) is a clown.
 

K!NG HARA$H!MA

Hustlerversity Graduate
#32
I don't feel tension not only in Op but pretty much in any fictions nowadays


Because you know popular characters that people are emotionally invested ain't getting killed.



I personally couldn't careless if side characters die especially the 1 arc types.


Even if Usopp dies, I'd still feel lack of tension because I don't have emotional investment in his character
 
#34
It's nothing like that tbh.

As an IMU fan, you expected IMU to destroy Luffy.

It didn't happen and we got IMU showing more than he was suppose to and took hits.

Thus, for you it became bad writing.


Thing is most people knew this is likely to happen. Infact, we don't even know what IMU is really capable of. All we can be certain of is that this isn't the arc in which IMU is going down and Luffy is nowhere near IMU's level.
I also don't understand why people think death = tensions lmao

Death isn't required to have tensions in the story.

One piece needs SHs to face consequences of their actions which often are careless, and not well planned. Consequences could be anything (not necessarily death) which adds up but there has to be some consequences and not everything turning out to be in favor.

And, oda needs to stop dragging less relevant sub plots and focus more on building mysteries (we have tons of it ) to keep suspense alive.
There is a massive difference between thematic freedom and narrative immunity. Luffy's rubber properties used to be creative limitations he had to bypass with grit and physical toll (like Gear 2 shortening his lifespan). Gear 5 doesn't just grant freedom of movement; it grants freedom from consequences. When freedom means instantly healing from cursed, lethal blade wounds in a single panel, it’s no longer 'goofy fun' - it’s a cheat code. When the protagonist has no vulnerability, the antagonist has no menace.
If an ancient enemy who spent 800 years studying, fearing, and successfully defeating the original Joy Boy cannot exploit a single weakness, then the concept of vulnerability in One Piece is officially dead.
 
Last edited:
#35
One thing that also helped killed any sense of tension is that Luffy and the Straw Hats, aside from Saobody, and many other characters never face any negative consequence that are the results of their actions, even despite Luffy's countless reckless and stupid actions which should have brought so many problems to him and his crew, and he never mature and learns to tone down on his recklessness.
 
#39
I don't feel tension not only in Op but pretty much in any fictions nowadays


Because you know popular characters that people are emotionally invested ain't getting killed.



I personally couldn't careless if side characters die especially the 1 arc types.


Even if Usopp dies, I'd still feel lack of tension because I don't have emotional investment in his character
No one cares about ussopp , franky
Their deaths wont matter a bit
 
#40
Imu is just not that strong, Luffy ending up in a Dangerous Situation is decided by Author as much as saving him,
Yes, Oda made Luffy survive those serious stabs, but He also prevented Luffy & Loki from fighting together as soon as Imu arrives,
It evens out.

It's no different than Luffy surviving when Arlong sent him underwater, but that entire Scene could have been avoided in first place, and We just directly have Luffy vs Arlong Duel, or when Mr. 3 Captured SHs ... etc Author forces his Characters in Danger, and then forces them out of it,

Plot Armor instead is when MCs don't have any cards to play, and yet Author pulls a heart of cards out of his ass & saves them, but that's not the case in Elbaph, Imu is simply not that Powerful, both Elbaph Side & Imu Side could win this even if Imu have a slight advantage due to his Powers being Unknown mostly,

I only expect tension when Oda brings a Threat that MCs have no possible play against,
Such as Mihawk arriving in Baratie, Kuzan meeting SHs, Kuma confronting them after Moria Battle, WB's Side started losing ... etc
The only thing saving SHs was those Villains sparing them, but not before They gave them a Reality Check & memorable Moments,
Imu isn't such Threat, He is just Elbaph Villain, even his Motivation is that He needs "Help" (More Military Power),

We haven't even seen Elbaph's Heaven World, so be patient & wait for Oda to Introduce a bigger Threat than Imu.
 
Top