Worstgen

Sentinel
Sentinel
1. Not entirely but there are certain topics in which the toxicity is very high.
2. Sanji vs Zoro (how can a few people even think that Sanji wins against Zoro? It baffles me).
3. I dunno.
Sentinel
Sentinel
Btw. WG is not the only place in which debates can be very toxic. Every fandom have some sort of tards, you can't simply do anything against that.
djiayebee
djiayebee
@Cinera i know there is warning system & bans, but only mods know about it no? when a user (especially new joiners or people not too active) engage in a convo, he doesn't know if that counterpart is someone who can be toxic or not..... if we have a way to lets say see "oh that guy has been reported multiple times before", maybe it could help to decrease the toxicity a bit?
djiayebee
djiayebee
... like giving indication whether it's worth or waste of time to try discussing with someone? And for other users, can more easily decide to skip or even ignore someone.... That way maybe some obvious trolls would behave a bit better? Dunno just throwing ideas ^^
Kejon
Kejon
3. Stop banning me, thanks.
Cinera
Cinera
I think tags/flairs of shame may have unhealthy dynamics/impacts. Furthermore, there isn't really an objective standard for how much someone would enjoy interacting with a poster. Some people like the posts of and interact with some of the posters I have/had on ignore for example.
Cinera
Cinera
IMO stuff like: "which posters are worth engaging with" is better spread memetically/via social osmosis than through explicit mechanics.

Zoro fans can learn to ignore certain problematic Zoro haters, and the Sanji fans can similarly learn to ignore some problematic Sanji haters.
djiayebee
djiayebee
@Cinera yup yup totally agree with you... that's why i dont think having a dislike button would be good, but instead i suggested something which would be handled by the mods only~ it wouldn't limit people decision in any way, just give an extra information about other users!? anyway again that was just some random idea thought on the moment
Cinera
Cinera
I welcome the suggestion, I was just giving my impressions on it.
Finalbeta
Finalbeta
Dislikes would not solve the issue I guess, just further the salt~
E
Ena
3) unban zorogang
Cinera
Cinera
@Queen eh, he was a problematic poster, and the mods did give him plenty of chances. He honestly brought his ban upon himself.
Finalbeta
Finalbeta
It's a shame it ended like it ended, but it was inevitable I suppose. Many bans were reiterated :/
Sentinel
Sentinel
Sorry but we neither need Zorogang nor Moe. They had their chances and yet they did not stop posting their shit.
TheAncientGorosei
TheAncientGorosei
If Zorogang comes back to the forum, so must Moe.

Do you want that on your shoulders?
J
Just a member
Nope

I never see toxic stuff around. Maybe there is not much around or simply the mods are fast at removing it (considering I'm not very active impacts the fast term). Anyway there is not a great number of perma/banned people so it seems fine.

Give a good degree of freedom is already good enough. I could suggest things but they would be good just for me and probably difficult if not impossible to make real.
Cinera
Cinera
Finalbeta
Finalbeta
To bo honest I like the way the forum is moderated. It lends more freedom of speech than most communities which is a plus and not an off
J
Just a member
@Cinera I would suggest to talk more about topics I like but you see it is subjective, it maybe would be good for me but not for the forum also I can not make people like and comment what they don't like. I think it is the same for everybody but the answer is simply ho look for other forums focused on other topics. WG is fine as it is imo.
Top