If it shows God Valley itself, which it should, this flashback is the sendoff for the old gen, the last goodbye as they fall into irrelevancy and their sons/successors take over. It builds up towards 3 characters - The successor of Rocks, the successor of Harald and the successor of Garling.
Sure.
However, we are introduced to Mihawk in the present and he will serve his purpose in the present.
His purpose is to be the strongest opponent for Zoro and how he obtained the title isnt tied to his purpose.
We only get to see how Zoro obtains the WS title while we may never get to see how...
Characters in the OP world are NPCs who think only when Oda makes them think.
Otherwise, they are blank sheets of paper with no thought process.
I would not bet on Oda revealing this, ever, because it is irrelevant.
I dont struggle with it.
I am just telling you that in-verse explanation doesnt exist.
Until Oda creates it and looking at WSM and WSC, it will never happen.
It is not plot relevant how he got his title, the only thing relevant is that he is the strongest and the one who beats him will be the...
This can be explained in several ways.
For example, voice of all things or reading poneglyphs or finding out such information through Elbaf's library considering that Jarul ages back 400 years so it isnt so hard that info from twice that age got somehow passed down in Elbaf.
The discovery that...
You think there is a World Sword Association in the OP world that grants the title? :milaugh:
You think eating a DF will help you against Mihawk? :milaugh:
No, they never said Mihawk defeated Shanks. Made up.
Nobody has granted Mihawk his title, it is the author who grants it. Just like he granted it to WSC and WSM.
They didnt defeat anyone for the title to be granted to them.
You still havent figured out Mihawk's one and only purpose in the story...
Dudes dont learn haki for decades and Zoro was taught haki for 2 years during TS and bro thinks Zoro should teach people that might never develop haki in 2 weeks... :milaugh:
People are working hard against the logic that is 2+2.
Kaido's top 5 were never people that were supposed to be stronger than Kaido, they are failures by purpose.
They only hint at people that might surpass Kaido, the successors of those 5 and even they arent guaranteed.
I explained why Shanks...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.