Search results

?

Seriously...how tf do you bankrupt a casino of all things??? Lmao

Reagan was the result of Nixon's and Carter's failures. Reagan layed the blueprint for the Republicans to run with ever since. Trump ran with it, and took it in all kinds of crazy directions to the point it became his very own blueprint.

They were actually very similar. It ain't all just about ideology and leaning(Conservative Neoliberal vs Far Right Populist), but about what they did and pushed for. Trump was always a more extreme version of Reagan even during his 1st term, and went completely into pure insanity during this...

Not really. Some can have amazing domestic policy but terrible foreign policy, obviously with the reverse being true. I just agree with the idea of building statues of people for something they specifically did when their other actions are questionable to terrible. Robert E. Lee was good to...

It's crazy to compare 2 guys with the same slogan, mirroring policies, similar rhetoric, similar goals etc? Difference is that Reagan wasn't a wannabe dictator and manchild, and so blatantly corrupted.

And things are terrible in Reagon's own country because of his trash policies and propaganda. It's not just his fault but he was a certainly an accelerator. A person could save my life, but I'd still condemn him if he was an Epstein client.

If people are building statues of fucking Reagon of all people, you shouldn't be surprised of the Trump worship and leniency. Reagan walked so that Trump could run.

Why was I even tagged? It doesn't change what I said.

Now using words correctly is now abuse? Lol

Since when does definitions matter to you? Flip flopping again lmao

The amount of times he contradicts himself needs to be studied. On day he likes and agrees with all of my takes and in the next, disagrees when I repeat. He'll agree with textbook definitions but then deny them the instant they become inconvenient.

So you judge people are not thinking exactly like you. Nowhere is it stated that you have to make up definitions and greatly confuse people to be radical though? There ya go. Not the actual leftism by definition and its historical context, but your personal version. So it is perfectly fine for...

See this here is a big showcase of your problem. I did no such thing. Nothing about what I said suggests or imply a connection between hate and being radical. My posts are obviously critical about your assumptions about me that has been proven wrong and admitted by you time and time again. And...

You are not giving me information. It is completely irrelevant to what I said about me not growing up hateful despite my experiences. So you need be hateful to understand systemic problems or something? You are the one that posted the counter argument that I'm trying to be white or adopt white...

They're saying it was an ambassador now

They're saying Israel killed the leader of Pakistan who is a nuclear power. Now Iran is saying they're gonna attack Syria...all part of the plan huh Trump?

"Fanon analyzed how black individuals are forced to adopt white cultural values (the "white mask") to feel recognized as human, leading to self-alienation. He argued that racism is a "mental sickness" stemming from colonial power dynamics that treat blackness as a subhuman construct." This was...

So you decided to reference someone that is completely irrelvant to the point and imply I'm wearing a white mask? So you assumed I'm trying to be a white or adopted "white customs" in order to not be hate filled and be a cop. No other reason to reference a philosopher who argues just that...

He's back to his old habit of claiming nobody understands anything unless they agree with him aka he is right about everything. How exactly does naming a bunch of political theories and philosophies in place of accurate definitions help his case?