Search results

I know. I’m saying domi rocks > Evil Harald

There is basically no argument whatsoever for Harald being even equal to Domi Rocks

Roger’s final attack on Rocks is Roger cutting rocks to pieces

Ragnir can fly and Ragnir is more than strong enough to lift Loki Oda probably won’t ever do this in order to avoid getting comparisons to Marvel Thor but it’s factually a possibility that Loki can do this

Shanks cuts off Harald’s leg but then immediately afterwards Shanks says that his attacks aren’t doing anything because of Harald’s CoC What’s going on here? I’m gonna assume that Shanks is talking about his CoC having been negated. Even if His attacks actually managed to cut of Harald’s leg...

Source?

And I will keep repeating this until you explain where Oda has ever told us that Zoro using blunt force attacks is wrong or in anyway similar to your “pistol whipping” analogy

Source? Source? You are physically incapable of escaping your own circular logic Zoro using his very many blunt force attacks isn’t the same as Zoro “pistol whipping people” since at no point as Oda ever said that it’s odd or wrong or disqualifying for Zoro to do blunt force attacks Zoro’s...

Shut up Continue with your fairy tales and wank off to Sanji me non-existent feats on your own

I mean in this story where Zoro can literally make his sword stop cutting a leaf because he’s that good of a swordsman? Zoro’s master literally tells him that making his sword blunt is what makes him a great swordsman in this story where superpowers exist and magic swords exists. You don’t want...

Source? Tatsumaki is a long range attack. That Zoro did in close range. Because he could I have no idea why you think haki effects have anything to do with this discussion There is no character in the story that can change the direction of their flying slashes besides T-bone. But Zoro has...

I mean you can believe what you want but since you don’t have panels of things then they didn’t happen

Sanji never hurt a single seraphim even a little bit

According to who? source? no Roger wasn’t close enough for his sword to hit Rocks. Roger’s swords aren’t blunt. If they were close enough they would have cut Rocks So then the form of Rocks’ blunt force isn’t irrelevant too? I mean Zoro does blunt force attacks all the time and yet he’s not...

Holy fucking shit

Source? Hehehe (if you repeat Kouzaburo then insert Kouzaburo’s son) exactly like Zoro did to Hachi. It’s simply an attack. Nothing more and nothing less I’m still waiting for what point you’re trying to make with this I mean many swordsmen in One piece have unique ways of fighting and...

And Kouzaburo’s son says the opposite How is it not a debate when characters in the story say different things also I love how you don’t consider things like Parrying, Blocking, ripostes, spacing, agility, haki as part of swordsmanship. Somehow everything else that Zoro does that’s not...

Source? I’m gonna keep asking for a source everytime you just say this. And yes I know you don’t have a source and yet I will keep asking for one Like how Zoro has used long range attacks in melee range as I showed you What? What the hell are you talking about? Replicate? What? Rocks’...

Kouzaburo’s son said the exact opposite thing as Kozaburo. Swords that cut anything are not swords why should I believe Kouzaburo over his own son Rocks is directly stated to be famous for his blunt damage. Is Rocks a swordsman?

At no point has Oda ever defined what swordsmanship is in this story Again, no one ever said that swordsmen have to cut shit. As demonstrated by Rocks Roger has two named attacks, one of them cut Rocks to pieces. If Rocks is a swordsman then so is Roger if Shanks is a swordsman then so is Roger.