Search results

:zosleepy:

:risicheck:

Kaido has her cornered and beats her senselessly* Kaido stops and start a conversation, trying to teach her* You guys: "Kaido isn't showing mercy" 1631760013 It's like when Oda through Kaido's personality out of the window when he came face-to-face with Zoro Went from: "I want to die...

Why is Togen Totsuka in the poll? Zoro already did much more damage than Oden.:suresure::suresure::suresure:

Kaido did not defeat Zoro. Cope harder little one.:zosleepy:

:kata: 1631673666 Zoro did scare Big Mom with Enma Slash and Aura:kobeha::kobeha::kobeha::kobeha:

He tanked Zori's OniGiri What other tier would he be?

:gokulaugh::gokulaugh::gokulaugh: 1631621377 I actually accidentally clicked who's who option.:cheers:

King is Yonko level. Sanji is not. King fought Shanks. Sanji did not. :virusprot:

Again, wrong. There is nothing wrong with Free Will, There is something wrong with the idea of a 'god' that judges free will, no matter the definition of such 'god' Whether that 'god' is omnipotent/omniscient or not. If 'god' is omni, then again, the question arises as to why their ego needs...

you are comparing something that is limited to something that is not.:seriously:

believe in Woro:zosmug:

No, the problem is existence itself. Only with existence do the problems exists. Only when a person is born are they subjected to such problems.

Again, you are comparing "god" to "humanity" God is unlimited are they not?

Again :seriously: If god is limited by none & nothing, he should be all and nothing, present everywhere and nowhere. 1631614028 And no, you can't compare this to humanity. Humanity are not gods. They aren't omni.

Hypothetically, let's say your thought is 'true': This would be extreme cruelty. They all don't live happily under his rule do they. This 'god' of yours just sounds like a psychopath with extreme power. Someone who wants to feed their own ego. Why should a 'god' need their ego stroked?

:seriously:

an omnipotent/omniscient/omnipresent being can only be "nothing". "Nothing" would be the definition of god. So the answer would be both yes and no. 1631612210 But isn't that the problem? It's simply a cruel act. "No existence" should be preferable to others having to suffer and others...

Like you said "The definition of god(:zosmug:)" But to be serious. It's all about if God exists or doesn't. If 'god' isn't omnipotent/omniscient/omnipresent then they should not be labeled 'god'. Then whatever is 'trying' to be god, is just a terrible being. But if God are those things, why...