Search results

OK? You are stating that Hitler adding his spin to socialism, going against the definition. Hitler redefining socialism to be right wing still makes it right wing. It is nowhere near leftist by definition, ideology, goals, and actions. Socialism is an umbrella term due to the many variations...

A bunch of those names ranges from right leaning to far right, and they all got almost the exact same reasoning and playbook: 1- Hitler called himself a socialist 2. Mussolini was a socialist so fascism is his modification of socialism 3. Both were totalitarian regimes 4. Stalin also had a...

Hitler assumed that Russian armies would be weak due to the political power struggles and purges with Stalin. One of the biggest fuck ups in modern history lmao. Because pro capitalist propaganda(like the US Red Scare) and the need to distance yourself from the worst of your ideologies.

? Hitler by defintion, actions, and goals was not a socialist. Hitler himself admitted that he only called himself and his party socialist because it was popular with the people, and redefined the word to mean racial and national loyalty in Nazi Germany alone. Socialists and communists were...

Discriminating against someone and denying them basic necessities because of their race isn't racism :smart: The confederates among others would love this.

Anti-Irish sentiment was strong throughout the west during the 1800s because of how many of them were migrating. Religious clashing and economic competition were the 2 biggest reasons.

:nicagesmile: Is this a troll? You're guaranteeing socialist support to skyrocket and create more revolutions. This shit has proven to not work for good reason lmao

Aka your deliberately forcing someone's argument through your own personal framework, creating conflict. If someone is speaking in specifics, you don't argue in general and claim they are ignoring things outside of the specifics. You end up debating ghosts that has nothing to do with argument...

A ton of my posts, including the ones you agreed with, says the opposite. Not even like the 10th you forgot someone's stances and fabricated replacements for your rhetoric.

That is just capitalism with a very strong welfare state like Norway. Most socialist ideologies would hate it as they want capitalism gone entirely.

It has nothing to do with competition, and speaks volumes that you saw it that way. If someone is always annoyed by your super long, condescending posts, but I convince them by keeping it short and simple, sometimes using the same points as you, that should be a wake up call that your tactics...

You are, or at least is trying to be, far left, given the constant talk and praise of Marx, Communism, and revolution. You want everyone to be hyper-radicalized to the far left, and very often call other leftist centrist because you view himself as a just a simple leftist; you are not. Given...

Won't happen. Logiko is the physical embodiment of Begging the Question/circular reasoning fallacy. He already believes that his conclusions are true, and contorts any form of evidence to fit within his own personal premises. Nothing but assumptions without proving any point.

You're in full IDGAF mode and I love it lmao

So simply pointing out the contradictions and inconsistencies in someone's logic or reasoning, and then throwing it back at them in a logical way to force them into 1 of 2 positions: 1) directly address the fallacy or 2) dance around it and look ignorant. A common response to this method is...

And not all racism is white supremacy. It was right there...

It should be so simple to comprehend but that means admission of failure. All Nazis are fascist but not all fascist are nazis. Like how all white supremacy is domination but not all domination is white supremacy.

So what you're saying is, you have evidence that I'm trying to integrate into whiteness, throw black and radicalized people under the bus, defends systems that hurt me, and is not being hurt by the system? Are you assuming once again? Any evidence to suggest that you cant be radical because...

There was never any concrete evidence to suggests Fred Trump was a KKK member. He attended a KKK rally and got arrested for refusing to leave, but he wasn't in robes. Fed Trump and others arrested claimed they were simply bystanders. It is very suspect, and explains Donald's suspicious praisd...

He even claimed that it getting posted was an "accident", which still didn't address the fact he had it. Aside from that, he regularly praised white supremacist rallies but tries to damage control by saying "I mean the regular Patriots, not the supremacists there." It's a white supremacist...