Versus Battle 200 Unarmed Men vs Polar Bear
- Thread starter GalaxyLevelShanks
- Start date
Problem with this is 200 men actually can’t combine their strength in a meaningful way, it will be just the polar bear easily swiping through crowds. They can’t even damage it most of the time apart from the eyes and some sensitive parts.
Blunt force ain’t doing shit, only chance of victory is via exhaustion, then maybe swarm it and hold down the limbs. Don’t know how they’ll actually kill the struggling bear though. A bear in a vulnerable position could still mangle some dudes. Dudes holding down the limbs/head might tire out first then get swiped.
Blunt force ain’t doing shit, only chance of victory is via exhaustion, then maybe swarm it and hold down the limbs. Don’t know how they’ll actually kill the struggling bear though. A bear in a vulnerable position could still mangle some dudes. Dudes holding down the limbs/head might tire out first then get swiped.
That's what bloodlusted means though, they care for nothing other than killing their opponent
And sure, most would also die from suffocation, but they'd otherwise just die from being gored by a bear, seems like an easy choice to me
And sure, most would also die from suffocation, but they'd otherwise just die from being gored by a bear, seems like an easy choice to me
On your point of just piling upon though, 200 men is a lot. It's going to be super high and the later people will need to climb up a huge pile which will take a considerable amount of time. There's no guarantee it will happen either. The polar bear is a physical freak which will definitely react and try to rip apart the humans at the bottom of the pile, and while it may not work, the movement is definitely sufficient to disrupt the balance and cause the momentum to sway the pile making a ton of guys get injured or die due to fall from height.
Idk, ground is full of blood, flesh, organs, they're slipping out, bear is rampaging around. It's gonna be chaotic af and there's gonna be many casualties for sure.
I also think 200 men would win but they're not picking up a 700kg huge tank who's ripping and breaking through their flesh with a single strike or bite.
I also think 200 men would win but they're not picking up a 700kg huge tank who's ripping and breaking through their flesh with a single strike or bite.
Commercials told me they Are nice…
Unlike other bears, polar bears are pure predatory and if they attack humans, they always see them as prey.
It wouldn't even take two hundred piling on to suffocate it, I was just making a hypothetical with the total.
Realistically, five or six men could easily hold down each of its limbs, just their weight alone would be more than a polar bear can lift, and once you add the force the men would exert with their muscles as well, the bear would be helpless.
Realistically, five or six men could easily hold down each of its limbs, just their weight alone would be more than a polar bear can lift, and once you add the force the men would exert with their muscles as well, the bear would be helpless.
Alright, if I understand correctly then the matchup is 200 average male humans with no weapons Vs one average male polar bear in an snowy environment (which I assume means arctic or tundra)? All bloodlusted, nobody is allowed to retreat and the bear is facing all 200 at once?
This is basically a matchup of endurance and attrition. If the humans can exhaust the bear to death then they win, if they can't then they are screwed.
Both species have good endurance for mammals if I recall correctly but 200 humans is simply a huge number for a single bear to deal with. The humans can try to rotate their numbers so some of them can recover stamina but the bear doesn't have that luxury.
It would be a long drawn out battle with bloody casualties but I think the humans can mob the bear into exhaustion but I don't blame anybody for thinking the bear could win.
I will say that the bear has much better chances than the similar 1 gorilla Vs 100 humans matchup that I see on Twitter.
This is basically a matchup of endurance and attrition. If the humans can exhaust the bear to death then they win, if they can't then they are screwed.
Both species have good endurance for mammals if I recall correctly but 200 humans is simply a huge number for a single bear to deal with. The humans can try to rotate their numbers so some of them can recover stamina but the bear doesn't have that luxury.
It would be a long drawn out battle with bloody casualties but I think the humans can mob the bear into exhaustion but I don't blame anybody for thinking the bear could win.
I will say that the bear has much better chances than the similar 1 gorilla Vs 100 humans matchup that I see on Twitter.
The worst thing is, when they see a human they're curiously approaching you and in the next few seconds, it's ripping your abdomen apart and eating your guts. While looking like that:
Unlike other bears, polar bears are pure predatory and if they attack humans, they always see them as prey.
Unlike other bears, polar bears are pure predatory and if they attack humans, they always see them as prey.
The worst thing is, when they see a human they're curiously approaching you and in the next few seconds, it's ripping your abdomen apart and eating your guts. While looking like that:
Unlike other bears, polar bears are pure predatory and if they attack humans, they always see them as prey.
Unlike other bears, polar bears are pure predatory and if they attack humans, they always see them as prey.
I think about the only thing that a lone polar bear can't take on in its environment on land is an adult walrus.