I might be slow for realizing this just now, but the momotaro theory, as logical and realistic at it is, actually has a huge problem
Oda just loves the story and puts a lot of references
Take marineford for instance
Akainu means red dog
Kizaru means yellow monkey
Aokiji means blue pheasant
So wano having similarities to the tale might just be a reference to it like in marineford and nothing else
Oda might twist the story again the same way he did in marineford
So far 3 out of 4 of the main characters of the tale are having key roles
Luffy(the monkey) is fighting kaido, Yamato and momo ( the dog and momotaro) are gonna lift onigashima
But the pheasant might just be absent or not play a big role, and wano might end differently than the momotaro tale
So rejoice zkk and monster trio vs kaido fans
:cheers::cheers:
There's still hope
Oda just loves the story and puts a lot of references
Take marineford for instance
Akainu means red dog
Kizaru means yellow monkey
Aokiji means blue pheasant
So wano having similarities to the tale might just be a reference to it like in marineford and nothing else
Oda might twist the story again the same way he did in marineford
So far 3 out of 4 of the main characters of the tale are having key roles
Luffy(the monkey) is fighting kaido, Yamato and momo ( the dog and momotaro) are gonna lift onigashima
But the pheasant might just be absent or not play a big role, and wano might end differently than the momotaro tale
So rejoice zkk and monster trio vs kaido fans
:cheers::cheers:
There's still hope