It's quite similar but the word societal don't has really the same meaning.
No it's not
Systematic is related to the system or government
a society aint a organization of any kind
Social pressures and social standards which deicate the society's general beliefs are unrelated to systems sure the system can follow societal norms but they are not the norms themselves
Systemic means that the discrimination and oppression are rooted deep in the institutions, the organisations, the structures, the laws
Yea im aware of what systematic means which is why, im confused at you saying it's similar to societal
but to address the point, what you brought up before was societal not systematic so what laws and institutions are doing stuff that oppresses and discriminates
these are key points in your argument here, And your simply just not explaining what they mean
Right winger say racism is bad, but promote the great remplacment theory. Which is a racist theory.
You can say the same with crt cant you?
I think it's just stupid as it's just internally inconsistent
logically bringing over foreigners to deal with white people is stupid, if they wanted white people gone then there are much more effective ways of doing so then progressive and slow population manipulation
and even then aint the replacement argument more of a further right point ie not a normal talking point for most right wingers
I think every thing, Left wingers have as a idea.
there's a rough equivalent on the right yknow like for femminiesm, there's mras or mgtows
but point being crt is the same idea, it's stupid conspiracy theory nonsense which is easily debunkable
if there was a class up elites, Shaking their hands going mahaha let's engineer laws and the media to opress black people and create false conceptions of them
then we wouldt have literal law makers defending blm
and have the big corpos making articles like this
https://edition.cnn.com/specials/world/confronting-racism
Fact of the matter, all the big corpos arent big racist right wingers looking to stop your efforts.
even disney has made it clear that it's on the left
https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-51871026
Ofc you can like ignore reality and what these people actually say and do to purpurate these top down racist narrative but from what im able to find nothing really conforms that idea
most of the racism is done individually not systematically
I didn't understand that.
When you said anti racist
did you mean oppose racism
or does antiracist have a specific meaning as a term outside of the conventional usage
Abortion being legal doesn't mean it's safe. Abortion laws are threatenned in a lot of states, the same can be said in major countries. But it goes farther than just abortion, it's about creating equity, ending systematic sexism, ending feminicids etc.
Abortion being legal does not mean it's safe
It's never going to be perfectly safe, it's a surgical operation afterall of course you can make it more safe but it's still a surgery involving the removal of a fetus or baby if it's a late term from the womb
sometimes they cant suck it out so they have to get twicers in there and that can cause injury to the internals if done wrong so yea there are risks involved but im to mean how else would you presume that to work ie what would be the alterative?
but yea, There's always going to be a risk like just by the very nature of it being surgery
and yea people oppose alot
your not always going to get everyone to agree on everything
you have to think though alot of people see it as literal murder so yea your going to get alot of bad reactions and opposition obviously. and ofc you and me can say well what about if the mother cant financially afford the kid or that adoption agencies just cant handle all the kids which would be put there had abortion been illegal but those arguments dont matter as people who are anti abortion tend to have entirely emotional reasons and therefore cannot be reasoned out of it
Yea it's killing a baby, factually at least in the late stages of pregnancy but we also kill dogs if they are ill and need to put down, and most dogs are smarter then a late stage pregnancy baby
fetus is such an inaccurate term anyway, it's only applicable for the cell closter formed after the zygote's ending stages
after six weeks or whatever, you can see head formations and hands like it's clearly just a developing baby at that point
but the problem being with abortion, it's such a hot issue that ill piss anyone off regardless of how fair im trying to be or how factual im being, if im to say well you know there are circumstances where abortion might be required then right wingers get pissy and if im to say well a baby in the womb is still a baby by it's anatomy alone but then left wingers get pissy cause not saying it's a fetus
as if this fetus
Is clearly the same thing as a baby in the womb
Like im not denying reality so to pretend like abortion is just killing some inhuman blob
just as im not denying reality when saying women who have abortions are unhuman murderers
there is context and nuance to situations
stuff which cant be factored into a judgement when you see every single human who disagrees as evil
The far right is anti-science, anti-social, anti-reality but they are also pro-liberals so they need to convince the people that vote for them that they are actually doing the opposite of what they are really trying to do:
their whole argument for most of their takes regarding trans and gay people are a genetic fallacy ie science based
where the left argues on social or societal factors for such things like utility of language as a example
